| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: CSU, CO
Posts: 290
| If the space where the gear engaged was smaller there would be less slop right? If so what if new gears wear made with an opening just slightly bigger than the fork. Does anyone think that would work? Also if it would do you think Acetal (Delrin) would work for gears. On Onlinemetals.com you can get a foot of 1” round for $5.73 plus shipping. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: CSU, CO
Posts: 290
| If you click on the Acetal (Delrin) above you can see the properties. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Colt Python/SR9c ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: out in the shop, reloading ammo!
Posts: 8,677
| to me, the reason that section on the gear is so wide( wider than the fork) is so it can change gears easier. with it being just a bit larger than the fork, it would take more precision to go into gear instead of it just popping in. i wish there was a real answer for it, cause i just locked my trans in 1st gear( super glue) and it helps out alot but i would still like to hit 2nd gear sometimes when needed. but try working on it and let us know what happens |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: BAY AREA
Posts: 545
| yea I dont like the slop. i just noticed that with the e-maxx tranny I got. Hope we can figure something out, cuz I too want to have a 2 speed. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Santa Clara
Posts: 1,461
| I have dealt with Acetal at work and to me it would seem too brital to use for gears. It seems to crack real easy. -Sam |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 177
| Here is a post with details of how I solved this problem: http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/PHP_Mo...pic.php?t=7892 Also has a write-up on the Rockroach project (which as of last weekend has been taken off the back-burner It is a dedicated crawler so second gear isn't needed. Reducing the size of the slot with epoxy or similar might work OK if for low speed applicaitons. |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| TCS Team Manager ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 6,254
| Quote:
It would be cool to follow your progress | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Colt Python/SR9c ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: out in the shop, reloading ammo!
Posts: 8,677
| Quote:
it's about time someone lit the fire under your butt JK to get the roach project going | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 177
| LOL, well I have built up 5 MudCow clones in the meantime so I haven't been sitting on my hands (so to speak...) No probs, I will start a thread on here about the Roach project. Cheers, JK |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Iberia, Louisiana
Posts: 10
| Hey Neo I was thinking the same thing as you were with the idea of closing the hole on the gear that the fork slides into. I'm sure this would decrease the slack because when you take the back half of the tranny of and run it you can see the fork is fairly small compared to the slot. I was going to try filling in the slot with jb weld or epoxy then cutting a camfer on the slot and the fork so they slide together faster, just waiting on another maxx tranny. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |