umm no they dont
slugs are a relitivly low muzzle velocity and heavy, they loose velocity very quickly compared to a rifle shot. they tend to be used more in dense bush where the shot distance is less then 100feet a rifle shot is far more accurate and leathal at a much further range
Well, Nice deer to start with! Even though its a little small, it will be much better eating than a 200lb old buck!
I shot a deer just like that this year just to put in the freezer! Congrats on your first deer!
Anyways, about the slug thing. I'm not much for Shotgun hunting, I'm a bowhunter primarily but I can attest to the fact that slugs do a hell of a job on a deer and they can be shot from quite a distance if the shotgun is sighted in properly.
Most slugs that people will see are of the rifled variety. The lead slug itself is approximately the same size as the bore of the barrel. The new SABOT type slugs are MUCH MUCH more accurate and can be fired much longer distances. I witnessed my friend shoot a deer one year at 200YDS!! with a slug and drop it right in its tracks! I have my slug gun sighted in for 100yds! Its nothing to shoot them that far, Yes the slugs tend to drop quite a bit after 100 yds but at 150 yds, my slugs only drop 6".
Slugs tend to have ALOT more knockdown power than a rifle at closer ranges eg. less than 100yds. Because of the size and weight behind the slug. Yes, a rifle will have alot more knockdown power at 200-300yds because of muzzle velocity.
Shotguns are primarily used through the midwest because of the large amount of hunting done on open fields. The high powered rifles can shoot up to 1 mile easily through unobstructed areas, the shotgun slugs will likely only go 300 yds before hitting the ground. The shotguns are deemed "SAFER" I guess.
Personally growing up in Northern Wisconsin, I used High Powered Rifles and I prefer it to shotguns, but we have do deal with what we have in Indiana.