Lets be straight up honest then, the reason a lot of people don't buy the Droid is Motorola makes it. Their previous phones have had issues and most were software (RAZR, KRAZR, Q)...back when updates weren't easy to get on some carriers.
Granted and true moto has had lots of problems in the past, software mostly. But remember, moto does not make the software for the droid, google does. And we all know that google makes awsome software.
It's still the only phone capable of talking on the phone while using other apps.
That's a big negative there, bb storm, storm 2, tour, curve, curve 2, pearl flip, moto droid, droid eris, samsung omnia, ht ozone, touch pro 2 and imagio will all multitask. Yes, the iphone will surf the net while on a phone call. But let's be honest, first how often can you do that, and second how often does anyone do that?
Why would I need to? I can email or connect to the PC to move files.
You have no idea how important it is until you can
I replaced my boss's...it's not easily removable but its not hard to do "when needed". Why do you need to remove a battery unless to replace it?
True, but it also voids your warranty to do so. A lot of people carry two batteries with them because they are often not in a place where they can charge up. Not to mention its so nice to be able to just pop it out and slip a new one in instead of replacing the whole
phone, as at&t and apple will both tell you that you need to do when the battery fails.
Typical coming from a VZW worker...your view is jaded. My 3G is faster than my friends BB on VZW and faster than my sisters Droid (this is just in my local area, obviously). I use the wifi often, but the 3G isn't terrible.
Sure, at&t is fast. No argument here. But the fact is how often can you use it. Sure its quick when you can. But dialup is faster than your iphone the rest of the time.
Visual Voice mail lawsuit on many phones now, including the Droid. I don't see how this effects a phone. Unless they lose...Apple is not worried.
Apple is involved in several lawsuits over the iphone. They are being sued for false advertisements, slow internet speeds, phones not working, shutting down and bricking. They are being sued by the developers due to unfair approval process, and favoritism to certain devs, and probably the worst they are being sued by the owners of the devices for several things (all class action suits) for things ranging from malfunctioning devices, unfair business practices and even the camera that does not take a true 3 mega pixel picture.
This is untrue. Anyone with a MAC can build apps. Sure Apple has an approval process, but as I mentioned it is to help the iPhone customers have good apps. They do not let in buggy apps...Google's Android does; ask some people about the older G1 apps when it first came out.
Again, googles market is driven by its users. If we don't like it and rate it poorley it will be removed. If its a great app it will stay. In adition, all apps are frequently updated for new os's and to fix any bugs in the app. Sure some apps suck giant donkey balls. What's your point, that all 2600 whoopie cushion apps on the app store are great... apple has tons of sucky apps as well.
6 this year...
Lol, well, there you go. How many times has your phone crashed even with a new update, and be honest. My droid has never crashed, sure some have buts that's due to running several hundred apps at a time. And with the new update, the droid is even better.
My iPhone is connected to my work email through exchange, my home email through POP3 but syncs through my outlook for calendars and contacts which it adds and updates as I do.
Cool, that's good. It does pop3. Great. It still can't push. And the droid does
There is an app for that in the iPhone. Lots of them, single site ones to multi post ones.
Add here's some notes worthy:
MobileCrunch on the browser comparison using a actual test:
On the popular web-standards test known as Acid3, the iPhone scores a 100/100 while the Droid caps out at 93/100. The iPhone browser is also considerably faster, with page loads completing anywhere from 15-30% more quickly with both handsets on WiFi.
Yes, I read that too... now, man up and post the rest of that article. The guy that wrote it was an iphone guy. He says in his article that he is biased. And those are his scores not the actual scores. He gave the iphone the win because of its screen. We all know that's b.s. because the droid displays pages better than the iphone, and it has more colors to do it with. And those are facts that noone can dispute.
According to an Android site Androidandme.com:
Google does not support installing apps to the SD card (and likely never will), so developers are limited in what they can create. Have you seen all the awesome iPhone and iPod Touch games? Hardly any of them would fit on an Android phone. (Only 256mb for all your apps?).
There is not one phone in the world that can run apps from the sd card. I can install them from it tho. As far as the space constraint thing. I have over 200 apps on my droid and I have seen into the thousands. How many do you really have on your iphone. Research has shown that most people install around 80 and of those, they only use around 10. However, know this google and moto are working closely to be able to run apps from the sd card. I have seen a dev unit doing it. As soon as the kinks are worked out it will be a problem of the past.
And finally...if the iPhone is so bad, so horrible, so scary...why does Verizon still want it so bad?