• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

tattoo machine stuff...

Big Mike

I wanna be Dave
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,781
Location
Martinsburg WV
My brother recently asked me about converting his tattoo machines from the old-school clip style cords to RCA jacks. He showed me a catalog w/ a kit in it to do one machine that cost a staggering 40 bucks, and asked me what the deal was.

It took me 2.2 seconds to digest what he was showing me, and I told him the RCA jacks would place far less resistance on the circuit and most likely make the machines run more efficiently, and everything he was showing me could be had right down the street at Rat Shack for a lot less.

A quick trip and the same 40 bucks netted me enough parts and cords to convert and equip 4 machines. Solder up some pigtails w/ a connector on one end and an RCA jack on the other, shrink-wrap 'em, fab up some brackets real quick, and viola! the power transfer method steps out of the 19th century:

dsc01890c.jpg


dsc01886b.jpg


dsc01887.jpg


dsc01888.jpg


dsc01889u.jpg



After conversion all 3 of these machines are hammering harder and smoother than before, on 2 to 2 1/2 volts LESS input. I'm betting this will result in longer mainspring life and less frequent backspring tuning.

I don't lay the ink myself, I just work on the machines and do some artwork. From seeing these machines run and getting nothing but positive feedback from the artists who've run them, I recommend doing this conversion if you're into the art...
 
I always thought the "roach clip" thing was a stupid idea, that looks much better!! Good job man"thumbsup"
Now get over here I need some new ink!!:lol::lol::lol:
 
RCA has been around for a while now in tattooing. There are advantages and disadvantages to using them. They wear out quicker than a clip cord. I don't like them personally...
 
RCA has been around for a while now in tattooing. There are advantages and disadvantages to using them. They wear out quicker than a clip cord. I don't like them personally...

They wear out quicker? I've never heard these guys talk about any cords wearing out at all. What do you mean? Will the cord break at the plug internally from flexing around all the time?

My brother originally expressed an interest purely from a handling standpoint. He did'nt like how the clip would flop to one side or the other as he worked at different angles, he thought it affected the balance of the machine. He wanted to try this because he simply thought he would like how it handled better than a clip cord. I did it for him just because I enjoy making stuff like this.

I personally thought the machines "woke up" with this conversion. They just seem to run smoother. Maybe his clip cords are crappier than normal or something...
 
Last edited:
The wear out from the flex. They do get better contact with the RCA's though and run smoother/consistently. You can but the conversion from Pulse, Cam, ect.... for about $12 a machine. It's all personal choice by artist. In 20 years of doing this I have never had a clip cord fail.....
 
Ok, that makes sense. If it gets to be an issue I guess I could fab up some heavier cords. With spring ends like on a guitar cord plug or something similar.

The kit he showed me was like 38 bucks! I don't remember who's catalog it was, probably Eikon w/ a price like that. 12 sounds more like it.

20 years?? Wow. Got a website or anything? I'd like to see some of your work.

Thanks for the input...
 
Back
Top