RCCrawler Forums

RCCrawler Forums (http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/)
-   Axial SCX10 II (http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/axial-scx10-ii/)
-   -   Different take on Suspension (http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/axial-scx10-ii/576740-different-take-suspension.html)

Stollenritter 12-24-2016 05:32 AM

Different take on Suspension
 
6 Attachment(s)
In order to get room for a full interior / rear compartment I startet tinkering around with the suspension. First idea was to build a leaf spring setup, but I was afraid to loose to much travel and flex, so I am playing around now with a coil sprung setup with separate shocks.

Enough words, pics now:

Attachment 353043

Attachment 353044

Attachment 353045

Attachment 353046

Attachment 353047

Attachment 353048

Please feel free to share your opinions and ideas!

Mr_Ed 12-24-2016 06:35 AM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
It looks real cool and perfectly executed.
I don't quite understand though why you didn't just angle the shocks with the springs.

Stollenritter 12-24-2016 06:46 AM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Ed (Post 5610136)
It looks real cool and perfectly executed.
I don't quite understand though why you didn't just angle the shocks with the springs.

Thanks for the nice comment! ;-)

I was looking for a more scale look, so I took inspiration from my old Land Rover.
Indeed, angled coil-over shocks would perform better.

JTB488 12-24-2016 07:45 AM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Love the spring seats!

Badd 12-24-2016 08:00 AM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Interesting and well done, let us know how it preforms .

hotwheels000 12-24-2016 09:34 AM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Casings for spring seats is brilliant.

allanon1965 12-24-2016 11:16 AM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
looks good, but I would figure out how to capture the top coil of the spring as well, to keep it from becoming dislodged

skybolt 12-24-2016 02:11 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
.44 Mag case's for spring perches!!! I love it!

sbs10v8 12-24-2016 02:21 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Killer idea but i would think the springs would bow out in the middle instead of compressing up and down.

Stollenritter 12-24-2016 05:44 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JTB488 (Post 5610170)
Love the spring seats!

Thank you. It was fun making them ;-)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badd (Post 5610174)
Interesting and well done, let us know how it preforms .

Thank you, I will do so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotwheels000 (Post 5610246)
Casings for spring seats is brilliant.

Thank you. The springs just snap on them and be kept in place.

Quote:

Originally Posted by allanon1965 (Post 5610298)
looks good, but I would figure out how to capture the top coil of the spring as well, to keep it from becoming dislodged

Thank you. Yes, the upper end may pop out. Upper spring seat is a part of Axial AX80032, pressed in the aluminium bracket.

Quote:

Originally Posted by skybolt (Post 5610434)
.44 Mag case's for spring perches!!! I love it!

Thank you. Well spotted Sir! "thumbsup"

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbs10v8 (Post 5610438)
Killer idea but i would think the springs would bow out in the middle instead of compressing up and down.

Thank you. It is worse. When flexing, the spring will be s-bent due to misalignment of the spring seats.


Conclusions by now:

- changing springs to try different spring rates is very easy. The springs just snap on the lower spring seat / spring retainer :ror:

- the springs do not bow out while compressing straight

- the springs get s-bent horrible at full flex (travel and flex is a tad more than stock)

- spring rate is linear due to the vertical arrangement

- damping rate is degressive due to decreasing angle of linkage (which is negligible for a low speed vehicle)

I will post some flex-shots tomorrow. Thank you all for your nice comments! "thumbsup""thumbsup"

TacoCrawler 12-24-2016 07:23 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
You won't be able to keep long coil springs in line as they compress...
It's not like it hasn't been tried and proven a failure in the past.

And is likely why coil over struts came to be engineered
So that the longer coil springs could be utilized.

But some folk just gotta try their engineering skills and attempt to ignore history.
Seems like a whole lot of work with no promise of good results.

Why not simply design a canti-lever system ?

It does already exist for RC platforms...
but maybe you could make a better system ?

The Revo uses a canti-lever suspension and will eliminate the need for shock towers.

Dinky RC borrows that design and makes a kit to fit the SCX-10
ie: SCX10 Cantilever Kit – DinkyRC.com
Often used out back to retain a full bed depth without punching holes thru that for shock towers.


Maybe try yer idea using shorter coil springs ?

good luck

http://image.fourwheeler.com/f/37008...l_spring_setup

whitrzac 12-24-2016 07:57 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Because it's been done before...

whitrzac 12-24-2016 07:58 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Similar concept

http://www.ultimatetamiya.com/trucks...miya-cr-01.jpg

makya 12-24-2016 08:02 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TacoCrawler (Post 5610635)
You won't be able to keep long coil springs in line as they compress...
It's not like it hasn't been tried and proven a failure in the past.

And is likely why coil over struts came to be engineered
So that the longer coil springs could be utilized.

But some folk just gotta try their engineering skills and attempt to ignore history.
Seems like a whole lot of work with no promise of good results.

Why not simply design a canti-lever system ?

It does already exist for RC platforms...
but maybe you could make a better system ?

The Revo uses a canti-lever suspension and will eliminate the need for shock towers.

Dinky RC borrows that design and makes a kit to fit the SCX-10
ie: SCX10 Cantilever Kit – DinkyRC.com
Often used out back to retain a full bed depth without punching holes thru that for shock towers.


Maybe try yer idea using shorter coil springs ?

good luck

http://image.fourwheeler.com/f/37008...l_spring_setup


so, is ignoring history the same thing as not reading posts and talking trash about something that OP has already stated was a problem? :flipoff:

he just said that the spring compression was a problem, you posting up after that and saying the same thing is nothing more than mental masturbation at that point.

JTB488 12-24-2016 08:19 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
If the OP wants to play with the suspension on his rig, is having fun doing it and not telling everyone else to do it...what's the problem??? Isn't part of this hobby about experimenting and having fun??

OSRC 12-24-2016 08:47 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
I've been running standalone coils on my CR01 for years. Working like a charm. I do get some some S-bending at full compression, but it's never been a problem. I think your setup looks great! If it works for you, that's all that matters.

TacoCrawler 12-24-2016 08:50 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by makya (Post 5610665)
so, is ignoring history the same thing as not reading posts and talking trash about something that OP has already stated was a problem? :flipoff:

he just said that the spring compression was a problem, you posting up after that and saying the same thing is nothing more than mental masturbation at that point.

I read his postings dipstick

He said he was attempting a scale look !?

If a scale look doesn't reflect a real 1:1 rig
then I have no clue what is meant by stating that.

In 1:1 history... the longer coil lengths could not be made to work as wanted or hoped.
Complain to the engineers of the past whom couldn't make it work well...
they spent years trying to figure out how to keep the longer spring inline.
And used various methods in their attempt of doing that.
Finally realizing the better solution was to design something else that worked better.

Maybe you can fit a square peg in a round hole...
But history's engineers said screw that and found a different approach.

I did not criticize his attempts without offering other viable options.

Tho' if kissing butt and adding your motivational support means something to you... have at it.
Means little to me and IMO that isn't helpful in resolving anything.

People these days do not comprehend constructive criticism whatsoever...
and this modern society is doomed to repeat historical boogers... forever

so screw you and yer not to scale RC play toys :flipoff:

TacoCrawler 12-24-2016 08:54 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by whitrzac (Post 5610658)
Because it's been done before...

Quote:

Originally Posted by whitrzac (Post 5610660)

A picture means nothing... let's see it in action.

TacoCrawler 12-24-2016 08:56 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OSRC (Post 5610687)
I've been running standalone coils on my CR01 for years. Working like a charm. I do get some some S-bending at full compression, but it's never been a problem. I think your setup looks great! If it works for you, that's all that matters.

Video of that to prove your claim

makya 12-24-2016 09:05 PM

Re: Different take on Suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TacoCrawler (Post 5610690)
I read his postings dipstick

He said he was attempting a scale look !?

If a scale look doesn't reflect a real 1:1 rig
then I have no clue what is meant by stating that.

In 1:1 history... the longer coil lengths could not be made to work as wanted or hoped.
Complain to the engineers of the past whom couldn't make it work well...
they spent years trying to figure out how to keep the longer spring inline.
And used various methods in their attempt of doing that.
Finally realizing the better solution was to design something else that worked better.

Maybe you can fit a square peg in a round hole...
But history's engineers said screw that and found a different approach.

I did not criticize his attempts without offering other viable options.

Tho' if kissing butt and adding your motivational support means something to you... have at it.
Means little to me and IMO that isn't helpful in resolving anything.

People these days do not comprehend constructive criticism whatsoever...
and this modern society is doomed to repeat historical boogers... forever

so screw you and yer not to scale RC play toys :flipoff:

*yawn*

I like what he did, so what?

he acknowledged the shortcomings, no need to be insulting towards him after that.

he's taken constructive criticism and thanked people for the input.

You're just being a dick in here and trolling.


as far as you trying to call out OSRC, try looking for it, he's got dozens of threads on his rigs here and all over a bunch of other forums as well.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com