|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-25-2007, 06:43 PM | #1 |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
| MWRCA Scale 2.2 spec class
Whats up guys, Cole82 and I have been discussing creating a 2.2 scale class for the winter season. We need to lay a foundation of truck guidelines down to make the comp fair for everyone. These comps will be different then our comps in the past. We have plans for mud bogging, hill climbing and timed higher speed obstical events. Obviously, locations for hill climbs and such are much more plentiful in our area then rocky comp spots. We are hoping to free up some of the pesky constant rules and restraints in rock crawling and keep it pretty simple and enjoyable almost like GTG events. However, the rigs need to start even in capabilitys in order for this class to be fairly competitive. Therefore, I feel the rigs that will compete need to have some of the same basic spec's. So I need to bounce some guidelines off you guys to get a feel for what we are looking to run. These are not the guidelines, but rather guidelines in discussion that need to finalized. If your not in our club feel free to voice your opinion anyways. After this is done we can create polls to vote on topics that need a final word. This is what I'm thinking: Basics 2.2 rims or smaller Tire height capped at 6 inches Chassis and body limits Chassis must be a ladder style and extend over the axles on both ends. Must run a complete body, bumpers, fenders, doors & tailgates must be intact. Some fender trimming is allowed but 95% must be retained. Flat beds are allowed as long as the flat bed matches the width of the truck. Wheelbase must fit within the fender wells of the body you are using. Tubed sections of a body are allowed. Such as roof cages, tube doors, tube bumpers. Shaft drive axles (no clod type) Real 1:1 suspension based designs No torsions, no sticks. Power Plant No more then 8.4 volts. No axle mounted battery packs. Electronics should be some what hidden. No Dig allowed. No 4 wheel steer allowed. Points on arrival These points will be awarded on arrival for: Scale Points, Maximum -15 total. -4 pts Hard Body -2 pts Roof Rack -2 pts Functional Spare tire -2 pts Interior -2 pts functional winch -2 pts Working Lights -2 pts Full Exo-Cage/Truggy -1 pt Rock sliders Every rig that is to be run must be voted in before it is allowed to compete via online poll. Scoring A winch may be used up to three times during a course without penalty. -5 pts for being leaf sprung. Reverses allowed (back up as many times as you want doesn't matter) One free recovery per vehicle Courses will be run in teams of 2 or more, one free recovery per vehicle then after that it will be a touch penalty. “Bumping” or “helping” up/over an obstacle is allowed as long as you don’t touch any vehicles. Last edited by Mnster; 12-27-2007 at 12:29 AM. |
Sponsored Links | |
11-25-2007, 06:57 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
|
I like using 2.2 tires on 1.9 rims so I think we should cap the tire hieght instead of rim size. We could also limit the tires to realistic width to height ratio. I agree with the interior idea, but think all should make atleast an atempt to hide the electronics and wha not. The frame should be as long as the body. Also should look realistic. No 1" tall frame rails round or square that big. I do like the idea of voteing on what truck will compete as well. |
11-25-2007, 07:16 PM | #3 |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
|
Made some adjustments. |
11-25-2007, 07:33 PM | #4 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
|
I don't like the power cap though. I don't have any lathe motors left, but if others vote for it I will go buy one. I think it looks pretty good. Others should please chime in on this subject. EDIT: maybe a wheelbase has to fit the body. Last edited by Cole82; 11-25-2007 at 07:53 PM. |
11-25-2007, 08:29 PM | #5 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Iowa
Posts: 83
|
So would a PTI goliath fit the bill for a base rig with the additions of driver and lights etc. Do they have to have open diffs or can they be locked? I may be in if I can use this rig with some minor mods. I don't know if I can build another rig in time for another comp season. I just got my super done and running!!! When are you thinking of having the first comp? MaxxRuner |
11-26-2007, 12:39 AM | #6 |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
|
Hilift kit would be better or a axial with a scale chassis.
|
11-27-2007, 05:14 PM | #7 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
|
Ben your comment got me thinking. You said my jeep was just a gopher with a fancy body. Isn't that all any of them are. All we add are body accessories. We aren't doing real tranny or real transfor case.
|
11-27-2007, 06:04 PM | #8 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 69
|
I'm so down with this! oh, and I'm almost ready to crawl again |
11-27-2007, 06:06 PM | #9 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
|
How is your home coarse going?
|
11-27-2007, 07:43 PM | #10 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Iowa
Posts: 83
|
Cole that kind of goes along with my question about using my PTI for a scale truck base as I think it would be a good for a scale with some leaf springs and stock size shocks. I agrree that all we do is body mods and accessories to make it look scale , everythin gunder the body is still R/C. Just my .02. But I'm still the new guy tryong to figure this game out!! MaxxRunner |
11-27-2007, 08:14 PM | #11 |
Web Wheeling Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 3,004
|
I really hate the idea of bonus points for every damn add on you can fit to your truck. When I wheel, I leave as much crap back at camp or home as I can, I only bring what is needed. The tow strap and shackles are stowed in a case, in the cab. Hilift is hidden along with the spare, all tools are packed away and secured in a tool bag. Sleeping bags, fire wood, tent, all is left at camp. Also the leaf spring bonus.... Jeeps these days are linked from the factory, my WK jeep is scale in terms of not having leaf springs. I would just have a pass no pass scale tech rule, judged from those who are competing in the class. If 3 people vote no, and 2 vote yes for a rig, it can't compete. |
11-27-2007, 09:48 PM | #12 | ||||
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
| Quote:
The best way to take care of this problem would be to hold different classes. for example a Mall wheeler and a Comp wheeler class. But, with roughly only 3-4 competitiors I really don't see that happening. Maybe, I'm digging into this to deep. Let me know. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
We've tried to hold scaler events in the past. But, it never works out because the rigs are so incompatible. What is scale to me is as real as I can get it, capability takes a second place. While to others scaler is defined as a truck that has a lexan body that lines up with the wheels. While I'm hauling all that extra scale weight through mud or whatever. Someone else is as light as a feather breezing through everything. Hence why I thought of the spec class... At the sametime though I don't want to limit any one. Keep posting these idea's, as much as I want to keep it simple I also want to keep it fair even and competitive. You guys are bringing up good points, I don't mean to shoot them down. But, I also want you to see my side of the reasoning. Maybe we should vote on who is to be the scaler rules foreman if there are any takers. I'd like to see the rules from a different point of view. Last edited by Mnster; 11-27-2007 at 10:08 PM. | ||||
11-27-2007, 10:00 PM | #13 | |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
| Quote:
The diff gear is plastic and weak, same one from the electric TC3 sedans. A set of axial or tamiya axles can be built up, PTI's cannot. Last edited by Mnster; 11-27-2007 at 10:02 PM. | |
11-28-2007, 10:57 AM | #14 |
Web Wheeling Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 3,004
|
Ben, if you want to reward people for scale details, tone down the list. Maybe bonus points for a spare would be as follows, 1 point for a non functional, undersized spare, 2 points for a undersized functional spare, 4 points for a nonfunctional full size spare (skinny or fat) and 5 points for a full size (skinny or fat again) functional spare. 2 points for a jerry can, another 2 for a jack, 3 points for a interior, 2 more with a driver. |
11-28-2007, 02:21 PM | #15 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 69
| |
11-28-2007, 02:48 PM | #16 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Tax Nation
Posts: 2,289
|
have you thought about locations for the events?? scale comps could be held allot more places than full on crawling. Of course Im going to offer up my place...I dont mind if you want to build mud pits and permant bridges etc plus I have some areas available that are great for scale but no challenge for crawlers.... I would realy like to see brushless allowed....its allot easier to hide a small outrunner than a 55t and when your talking cost, a Holmes Hobbies budget pack is only $100 and you have to figure a decent brushed setup will run you close to that if not more. How about a class for those that dont meet the "scale" criteria...where people that have made the drive and dont meet the rules could still compete. Maybe make it a no points class. |
11-28-2007, 07:05 PM | #17 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
|
No Ben I didn't think you were degrading the rubi. I know exactly what you are talking about. I built the truck like I would build a fullsize rubi with unlimited budget. Great input guys! Maybe we should just lighten up and run our trucks. No body wants it to turn into nat's judging and ruleing. |
11-28-2007, 11:08 PM | #18 | |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
| Quote:
I agree on this, we should hold a comp or do something. See how it works. I can explain it here on the forums how I think it will go. But, without knowing for sure who knows what happens. Really it's just 4 of us anyways. Edit: If you think our rules are overboard take a look. http://utrcrc.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=52 See though, Coles rig wouldn't fit in those rules. That is more of what I am looking for, strict guidelines on rig construction. Everyone has sort of the same classification of rig thus the comps are even and competitive. About 75% of those rules are taken care of by the competitors in order to run. I really like the scoring rules pretty laid back. Bumper stuff is a little sketchy but still cool in a way. I think everyones rig but Coles would fit the classifications but thats normal. I'd like to use a set of rules based off that just more toned down. Or maybe just run them as the they are. You know they work. Last edited by Mnster; 11-29-2007 at 04:10 AM. | |
11-29-2007, 09:33 AM | #19 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2007 Location: Taylors Falls just hanging with the MNRCRC crew.
Posts: 7,843
|
Hey Guys I know I don't have a dog in the fight, but I would certainly hope that in the future pure scale competitions would be held. I realize thats hard to do at this point in most groups because we are more competition orientated. But eventually it would be nice to see very strict scale rules apply. I like rewarding springs vs links springs have a disadvantage and detail the more detail the better this should be about scale. We already have outlets for pure competition in 2.2 and Supers. I think the scale faction of our hobby is by nature more of a GTG for fun and laid back competition with more emphasis on scale appearance than all out rock crawling performance. Twisted of the Colorado group has just posted their scale winter series schedule and rules I think they have a very good job on their formate. Don't shoot me felt like adding my two cents.
|
11-29-2007, 11:04 PM | #20 | |||||
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Those competitors could bash with us after the comp. Or we could simply let them run and not count their points. | |||||
| |