Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > Newbie General
Loading

Notices

Thread: TXT crawler electronics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2008, 12:16 PM   #1
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
Default TXT crawler electronics

What Im looking at running in my TXT Crawler on MoabXLs:

The Goat Brushless Crawler Motor and ESC System Combo
Traxxus TQ3 w/rear steer
2 x Hitec HS-5955 Titanium Servos (front and rear)
Split 7 cell Elite Batteries 4500mah


Is the BEC good enough to get the most out of those servos?... I would love to see 333oz turning power

Is that enough power?

Other items:
I have txt axles with MIP CVDs
R2HD tranny

Soon will have alum knuckles



Any additional thoughts very welcome

Thanks
Jeepernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-26-2008, 09:00 AM   #2
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
Default

I know I didnt ask any questions that couldnt have been answered,
Jeepernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 09:17 AM   #3
PapaGriz Yo
 
Grizzly4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
Default

Two 5955 servos is asking alot of the internal BEC. It may work, but it's prolly not going to work very well once the tires are in a bind.
I'd go straight for a voltage regulator or CCBEC if I were building it.
Grizzly4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 09:26 AM   #4
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
Default

K kinda of what I was thinking, and the CCBECs arent going to break my bank so.


I was just thinking because the rear steer only really gets used when you need it that would save the BEC power, but I guess if you are turning front and rear at the same time then it would be a problem.


so what is better to run, voltage regulator or CCBEC ?

I dont know really anything about the voltage regulator (*starts searching*)

Thanks
Jeepernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 09:54 AM   #5
PapaGriz Yo
 
Grizzly4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeepernick View Post
K kinda of what I was thinking, and the CCBECs arent going to break my bank so.


I was just thinking because the rear steer only really gets used when you need it that would save the BEC power, but I guess if you are turning front and rear at the same time then it would be a problem.


so what is better to run, voltage regulator or CCBEC ?

I dont know really anything about the voltage regulator (*starts searching*)

Thanks
If you were running a 7.2V main pack, the MPI ACC234 voltage regulator would be good for 16.7A of servo power if you set it to 6V. With your 8.4V battery the MPI will be good for 8.3A if you set it to 6V, and 10.5A if you set it to 6.5V. This may be a little less than the CCBEC on paper, but if you mount it to the alumunim chassis for better heat dissapation you can push it pretty hard. Several guys mention running two big servos off of it in this thread. Link.

Of course, the CCBEC is a very stout unit as well and is rated for 10A and has been proven by JRH to handle alot of stress.

I just mentioned the Voltage Regulator to bring up other options. I currently run the MPI in my 2.2 rock racer with a 5955 servo up front and a 645 in the rear. I also have a CCBEC in my 2.2 comp crawler running a 5998TG. They both work great.

Last edited by Grizzly4x4; 02-26-2008 at 09:56 AM.
Grizzly4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 10:18 AM   #6
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
Default

Thanks for the info Griz

I think I will run the CCBEC and if that doesnt cut it then try something else

But thanks again for opening up other options
Jeepernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 03:41 PM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 5280
Posts: 999
Default

I have been running 5 2/3A cell Rx packs to power servos. 1x Rx pack per Hitec 5995 servo, tons of power and speed. With my new set-up I am going with a CCBEC as I dont have the room for the Rx packs.

The 333oz of torque is at 6V, so you will need a BEC set to 6V to see that kind of power.
bustedcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 03:49 PM   #8
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
Default

so for less weight it would be better just to run the CCBEC over the Rx pack and it will still power the 6v needed ?

how are you running a Rx pack per servo? dont the Rx packs just connect to the res. , there is only one connection

sorry im so noob
Jeepernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 03:55 PM   #9
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Louis (High Ridge)
Posts: 1,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeepernick View Post
I was just thinking because the rear steer only really gets used when you need it that would save the BEC power, but I guess if you are turning front and rear at the same time then it would be a problem.
even if you aren't steering the rear, there is also a theoretical 333 ozin of torque available trying to keep the rear wheels straight, so you will be using power even if you are not directly controlling it.
hairba11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 05:19 PM   #10
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hairba11 View Post
even if you aren't steering the rear, there is also a theoretical 333 ozin of torque available trying to keep the rear wheels straight, so you will be using power even if you are not directly controlling it.

True.... LOL I dont know what I was thinking when I typed that

I laugh at meself
Jeepernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com