02-25-2008, 12:16 PM | #1 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
| TXT crawler electronics
What Im looking at running in my TXT Crawler on MoabXLs: The Goat Brushless Crawler Motor and ESC System Combo Traxxus TQ3 w/rear steer 2 x Hitec HS-5955 Titanium Servos (front and rear) Split 7 cell Elite Batteries 4500mah Is the BEC good enough to get the most out of those servos?... I would love to see 333oz turning power Is that enough power? Other items: I have txt axles with MIP CVDs R2HD tranny Soon will have alum knuckles Any additional thoughts very welcome Thanks |
Sponsored Links | |
02-26-2008, 09:00 AM | #2 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
|
I know I didnt ask any questions that couldnt have been answered, |
02-26-2008, 09:17 AM | #3 |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
|
Two 5955 servos is asking alot of the internal BEC. It may work, but it's prolly not going to work very well once the tires are in a bind. I'd go straight for a voltage regulator or CCBEC if I were building it. |
02-26-2008, 09:26 AM | #4 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
|
K kinda of what I was thinking, and the CCBECs arent going to break my bank so. I was just thinking because the rear steer only really gets used when you need it that would save the BEC power, but I guess if you are turning front and rear at the same time then it would be a problem. so what is better to run, voltage regulator or CCBEC ? I dont know really anything about the voltage regulator (*starts searching*) Thanks |
02-26-2008, 09:54 AM | #5 | |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
| Quote:
Of course, the CCBEC is a very stout unit as well and is rated for 10A and has been proven by JRH to handle alot of stress. I just mentioned the Voltage Regulator to bring up other options. I currently run the MPI in my 2.2 rock racer with a 5955 servo up front and a 645 in the rear. I also have a CCBEC in my 2.2 comp crawler running a 5998TG. They both work great. Last edited by Grizzly4x4; 02-26-2008 at 09:56 AM. | |
02-26-2008, 10:18 AM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
|
Thanks for the info Griz I think I will run the CCBEC and if that doesnt cut it then try something else But thanks again for opening up other options |
02-26-2008, 03:41 PM | #7 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: 5280
Posts: 999
|
I have been running 5 2/3A cell Rx packs to power servos. 1x Rx pack per Hitec 5995 servo, tons of power and speed. With my new set-up I am going with a CCBEC as I dont have the room for the Rx packs. The 333oz of torque is at 6V, so you will need a BEC set to 6V to see that kind of power. |
02-26-2008, 03:49 PM | #8 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
|
so for less weight it would be better just to run the CCBEC over the Rx pack and it will still power the 6v needed ? how are you running a Rx pack per servo? dont the Rx packs just connect to the res. , there is only one connection sorry im so noob |
02-26-2008, 03:55 PM | #9 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: St. Louis (High Ridge)
Posts: 1,279
| even if you aren't steering the rear, there is also a theoretical 333 ozin of torque available trying to keep the rear wheels straight, so you will be using power even if you are not directly controlling it.
|
02-26-2008, 05:19 PM | #10 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: $t. Helen$, OR
Posts: 1,082
| Quote:
True.... LOL I dont know what I was thinking when I typed that I laugh at meself | |
| |