Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Competitions and Events > WRCCA > WRCCA Rules
Loading

Notices

Thread: Bodieless Panel Requirements

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2008, 10:35 AM   #1
Oliver Custom Knives
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bloomfield NM , not something stupid
Posts: 1,047
Default Bodieless Panel Requirements

It says in the bodieless requirements : 2.1.3.1 Bodiless vehicles must have solid hood panel , solid roof panel , and a minium of 2 solid side panels.
Does this rule appply to 1.9 class as well ?

Thanks
Dwane
DwaneO is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-22-2008, 08:50 AM   #2
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 7,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DwaneO View Post
It says in the bodieless requirements : 2.1.3.1 Bodiless vehicles must have solid hood panel , solid roof panel , and a minium of 2 solid side panels.
Does this rule appply to 1.9 class as well ?

Thanks
Dwane

YES

2.1.3.1 refers to all bodieless vehicles regardless of class (Super, 2.2, and 1.9)


2.1.3.1 - Bodiless vehicles must have solid hood panel, solid roof panel and a minimum of 2
solid side-panels. Hood, roof and side panels must be separate pieces of solid material
installed onto the bodiless vehicle frame. All body panels are to be separate pieces from the
complete structural frame. Body panels must be solidly installed in a manner that is
representative of a 1:1 vehicle. It is required that at least one point of the side-panel must
reach to a span of 1” tall or more & at least one other point of the side-panel must reach to a
span of 2.5” long or more. In the case of a Unibody vehicle (See sec. 2.1.3.2 for Unibody
definition). The Unibody is considered to have all body panels needed without having to add
separate body panels as long as the hood, roof & side panel areas meet all the general panel &
side-panel size requirements above.
Fishmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 08:55 AM   #3
varcor.org
 
swell searcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 757
Posts: 1,073
Default

On my upcoming bodiless chassis, I was planning a single piece for the hood and roof since I wanted to incorporate a "windshield" between the roof and hood lines. So this would be illegal, right?
swell searcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 09:09 AM   #4
Oliver Custom Knives
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bloomfield NM , not something stupid
Posts: 1,047
Default

OK , so this rig would not be legal because it only has one side panel , is that correct.
Thanks for the help too
DwaneO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 09:13 AM   #5
Rock Crawler
 
JIA's Dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Midway
Posts: 836
Default

If you have one on the other side you would have 2 side panels!!! DUH
JIA's Dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 09:15 AM   #6
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 7,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JIA's Dad View Post
If you have one on the other side you would have 2 side panels!!! DUH
Exactly...LOL
Fishmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 09:19 AM   #7
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 7,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swell searcher View Post
On my upcoming bodiless chassis, I was planning a single piece for the hood and roof since I wanted to incorporate a "windshield" between the roof and hood lines. So this would be illegal, right?
Technically YES, but I personally would let it go since you are not violating the spirit of the rule

A stratically place break in the material may be the best solution
Fishmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 10:47 AM   #8
varcor.org
 
swell searcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 757
Posts: 1,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishmaxx View Post
Technically YES, but I personally would let it go since you are not violating the spirit of the rule

A stratically place break in the material may be the best solution
cool fish... i like following the "spirit" of the rules...
swell searcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2008, 10:08 AM   #9
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 7,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swell searcher View Post
cool fish... i like following the "spirit" of the rules...
By "spirit" I mean the rule was written to keep tubers looking some what realistic, and by adding more realism (windshield) to your truck you are penalized, and that was not the intention of the rule
Fishmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 09:29 AM   #10
Rock Crawler
 
ripper7777777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Humble
Posts: 800
Default

So the Grape Ape is Comp Legal?

I guess it's important to stay on top of the rules...LOL


Quote:
NOTE: These bodiless
rules are in a 1 year trial period to see how people respond to it and after that time these rules &
requirements may be revised.

So any word on any possible changes to the bodiless rules for 09'
ripper7777777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com