We had a "demonstration" up here a couple of days ago, they were expecting it to be violent, turned out to be peaceful, thankfully. From the pictures I saw, I think a big keeper of the piece were private citizens lining the demonstration route carrying AR-15s.
Weapons of the weak and fearful...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah gathering in a large group to toss rocks, bricks, and molotov cocktails at people, cars, or buildings is brave. Protecting businesses or people with an AR15 is cowardly :roll:
Rioting is plain wrong
Maybe I’m just biased against the mil-spec weapons because of the clear history of the dangers associated with. I fully support the ban of all assault weapons, religion, etc. Historically, where do they lead?
"Riots are often the desperate response of people who feel they have no other recourse. We can reduce rioting by providing better access to justice for everyone."
https://time.com/3951282/riot-violence-use-american-history/
I agree with your sentiment. Rioting is plain wrong, and I’m all for arresting and prosecuting the offenders accordingly.
Peacefully protesting on the other hand is essential in a free society. The implication of people lining the streets with military style weapons is: “if you riot and loot, we will shoot you”, which is illegal, and also prosecutable, and carries a potentially much stiffer penalty than theft, vandalism, destruction of property, etc.
Maybe I’m just biased against the mil-spec weapons because of the clear history of the dangers associated with. I fully support the ban of all assault weapons, religion, etc. Historically, where do they lead?
I agree with your sentiment. Rioting is plain wrong, and I’m all for arresting and prosecuting the offenders accordingly.
Peacefully protesting on the other hand is essential in a free society. The implication of people lining the streets with military style weapons is: “if you riot and loot, we will shoot you”, which is illegal, and also prosecutable, and carries a potentially much stiffer penalty than theft, vandalism, destruction of property, etc.
Maybe I’m just biased against the mil-spec weapons because of the clear history of the dangers associated with. I fully support the ban of all assault weapons, religion, etc. Historically, where do they lead?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So… why not outcry, demonstrating, or looting over this guy?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/us/david-dorn-st-louis-police-shot-trnd/index.html
Does his life not matter because he wasn't killed by police?
Most, even those who have been positively identified on camera will not be, there are just too many, and they know that.
First, most of the people carrying the ARs were in solidarity with the protestors. Second, these armed people were doing nothing to prevent the protest, and, again, many were actively supporting it.
Third, YES, if you riot and loot, YOU SHOULD GET SHOT. Period. Never minding the fact that most of this violence is being promoted and orchestrated by that fascist coalition known as Antifa.
And yes, I fully understand that "Antifa" stands for "anti-fascism", but this 'organization' pushes its message by silencing its opposition through fear, intimidation, and violence, which are the core instruments of fascism. This group calling itself "anti-fascism" is like the NRA changing its name to "The Anti-Gun League".
Personally, I agree with your sentiment about these types of weapons. They can be converted, easily, into weapons that have a high fire rate with high capacity, even through they are not actually fully automatic. But, where does it stop? Where do you draw the line of weapons, today they take the ARs and AKs, tomorrow they are taking the revolvers , .308s and shot guns? I am a firm believer that the day after our 2A rights go away, our 1A rights follow.
So… why not outcry, demonstrating, or looting over this guy?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/us/david-dorn-st-louis-police-shot-trnd/index.html
Does his life not matter because he wasn't killed by police?
Woo boy. This place can pop off with these right here.
My two cents. I don’t trust the government enough to sacrifice any gun rights. I do think there’s a middle ground to reduce the risk and danger involved, but the people need firearms. If a government is not afraid of its people or their ability to fight back then it has little reason to serve the people and not themselves.
As far as religion, I think the world would be better off without it. But it’s not going anywhere.
My three cents on everything else. Protests are necessary. Rioting and looting sucks. Not everything is as it seems right now.