• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

20 yrs you say?

I hope so. Already licensing, too. Good. Hope it happens.
 
microgoat made me a chassis he named the nanotube. For TLT axles, and it suspended a Stampede transmission from the top, and the lower links mounted to the lower suspension pivots built into the transmission. He was living in the future.
 
468px-12-stark-shows-stane-the-arc-reactor.jpg~original
 
I found this. Seems pretty practical until fuel is available.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/shkFDPI6kGE?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/5RehT-Do9bs?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:
Well, I do have one charger that will push 32 amps into a 3s pack. And it is a prototype that I'm testing for another company. Good guess BigSki :lol:
 
I'll just hook up my 45 amp power supply to the positive and negative and count to 120.
 

That article is over a year old.

The Oregon company is bankrupt.
ClearEdge Power: 'No reasonable option' except pursuing bankruptcy, closing Connecticut operations | OregonLive.com
Bunk fundraising BS
People are pocketing enormous amounts of money chasing unproven technology for fools.


As long as millions of dollars are thrown at it anything is a "viable" concept.
Oregon seems to love to throw money away.
"Just tell us your idea, and we'll vote for it..."

<IFRAME height=315 src="//www.youtube.com/embed/sZBPoRwog00" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

Yahoo is Bloom Energy’s latest customer | SiliconBeat

The levelized cost of Bloom’s fuel cells, per the consultants hired by
the Delaware Public Service Commission to evaluate the Delaware Bloom
feed-in tariff, is $215.00 per megawatt hour. Want more information?
The fuel cells are only 47% efficient based on almost two years of
operational data in Delaware. Because of this, they emit far more CO2
and VOC than competing combustion technologies – at 4 times the price!
$215/MW equals 21.5 cents/kw including the cost of the natural gas.
Maybe Yahoo has a source of FREE landfill methane gas to lower the cost? Conventional gas/turbines can generate electricity for as little as 5 cents/kw wholsale.
 
Last edited:
" Using tiny titanium dioxide nanotubes rather than graphite also speeds how quickly electrons and ions flow in and out of the battery, by ditching an energy-slowing additive needed in today’s batteries."

Breakthrough batteries last 20 years, charge 70 percent in two minutes | Macworld

Wonder if these may trickle into other industries...

Article is over a year old and this is one of the comments I loved from yesterday.

"Write about it when it's on store shelves, then you'll get me excited."
 
I just realized that titanium dioxide batteries have been on the market already, some fellows in the ebike world who are connected with the inventor have been using them for three years. They have about the same energy density as nimh, so you will have about 1/4 the runtime of a normal lipo weight for weight. The voltage profile is 1.5v to 1.8v per cell depending on anode and cathode mix.

In short, they were tested and discarded as too heavy for the runtime and cost as compared to lipo and liFe chemistries. If this was put into your phone you would have to recharge 3 to 4 times as often, so it better be able to recharge fast!
 
Back
Top