• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

2017 Scale Rules

Maybe the easiest way out (IF you are still gonna allow it) is to make everything that tucks behind a wheel legal. Like "cannot be visible when tire is viewed straight on" then who cares how it attaches

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Working on a project. Just came up against a rule that I had never considered a problem. Have to run a metal rail chassis in c1 next year. Would running the tub to support the ifs be an issue?
040b91c32a20bb4fa132e19a70a5f346.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It's legal for now, but sort of flies in the face of the rule. I think it's likely there might be some changes.

Regarding Post 423, we don't currently have any plans to update the scale driver size. We only added the minimum height this year.


tks for answers.

for legal or not legal... I hope in restrictive change for class 1 "thumbsup"

for minimun height... I hope for a future correction, but it will be very nice pay like full driver, the driver over minimun height with less legs/feet from now (2018 )."thumbsup"
 
Working on a project. Just came up against a rule that I had never considered a problem. Have to run a metal rail chassis in c1 next year. Would running the tub to support the ifs be an issue?
040b91c32a20bb4fa132e19a70a5f346.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that's fine as you have a full rail chassis, It's not that different than a skid plate.
 
Hallo I would like to ask how much scale points I would get with this interior ...

https://www.prolineracing.com/bodies/classic-interior-clear/

Here's the rule:

"A full interior must include these separate 3D pieces: seat, dash, steering wheel and complete floor. The
interior must be deep enough for a scale figure from the knees up."

I think it's good to go assuming it's deep enough for a legal figure. It's a good looking interior for sure.

Based on a previous ruling it is possibly legal. Dependent upon how a figure fits.
 
Any chance we're going to see to 2018 SORRCA rules early this year?

Build season is starting, would be nice to get a jump on things! ;-)
 
Any chance we're going to see to 2018 SORRCA rules early this year?

Build season is starting, would be nice to get a jump on things! ;-)

You need to ask that on facebook so that everyone thats not even on the committee can get hysterically upset at you for even asking
 
You need to ask that on facebook so that everyone thats not even on the committee can get hysterically upset at you for even asking

Oh, you mean the:
"I don't comp or build SORRCA rigs because scale points suck and if it were'nt for the bullshit points, I'd win every comp, so I just G6 instead" guys?

Yeah, they cry alot! :lmao:
 
Bomber RR10 related question and the rule regarding electronics coverage.

'All vehicles must have the motor, transmission, and electronics covered and hidden when viewed from the top and sides'

Would this require a relocation of the Bomber's axle mounted servo? And, would a Bomber require wheel wells up front?

TIA
 
Bomber RR10 related question and the rule regarding electronics coverage.

'All vehicles must have the motor, transmission, and electronics covered and hidden when viewed from the top and sides'

Would this require a relocation of the Bomber's axle mounted servo? And, would a Bomber require wheel wells up front?

TIA

Servo in the axle is fine. Wheel well covers are not mandatory but would make it look better and you would get a point for them.
 
Hi guys.

a question..

the toyota bj40:

Toyota%20Landcruiser%20FJ40.jpg


for class 2.

the front to the doors is pinched by default

the rule say:
"the inside of the front tires cannot extend outside of the width of the cab at the doors"

but where have I to take the measure?
the width of the cab at the front of door is lower that the width of the cab at the rear of door.

In the middle?

tks
 
Not a committee member but it makes sense to use the back side because that's how wide it is for the bed and fenders. Now if you got rid of the front fenders that might change things.
 
And to be absolutely clear. The widest part of the doors. The fenders or the bed have nothing to do with this.
 
Back
Top