• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Anyone make their own drag brake?

monkeyracer

I wanna be Dave
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
2,588
Location
Golden
I searched, but could not find.

Has anyone done this? It seems like it would be possible, but if someone has already tried it would be nice to see.

I was testing my current stock axial setup on the Multimeter, and here's what I found:

Voltage:
Neutral = 0.0V
Full throttle = 8.2V (lipo)
Brake = 0.0V
Full reverse = -8.2V

Impedence:
Neutral = (Meter maxed)
Full throttle = (no change, I think)
Brake = 0.0 ohm
Reverse = .781 or so ohm

So I was thinking that if the brake basically connects the motor wires together at 0v, 0ohms, it should work. The problem is I tried to connect the motor wires to each other, and it still allowed the motor to turn. Not sure why, because when I use the brake function, it actually does prevent the motor from turning.

I was thinking if it did work, I would be able to get a small normally closed relay, and connect the motor wires together through the 87 and 30 poles, and wire the 85 and 86 poles to the power wire on the motor. It would be a cheap alternative to buying a new esc for now.

The theory is when power is applied to the motor (forward or reverse) it will open the relay, and power will just flow as it normally does, when power is removed, the relay closes and connects the motor wires.

Will this work? Anyone tried it?
 
will radio shack part number 275-005 work?
It's a SPDT relay that should have a pull-in voltage within 2S lipo ranges, and enough current handling for a 55T crawler motor.
so which wires go where?
there's a common pole, no pole, nc pole, and two poles for the coil... I think it would be positive motor wire on the NC pole, negative motor wire on the common pole, parallel with the motor, and positive from ESC to motor in series with the coil pole, right?
searching 'dud dig' brought up every dig thread, even when narrowed to electronics section.
 
I could be way off but if the Relay operates at 7-8 volts would it not energize the coil and only send power to the motor at WOT?
 
I could be way off but if the Relay operates at 7-8 volts would it not energize the coil and only send power to the motor at WOT?


you might be right, i had a 12v NO Automotive relay lying around that would pull in at about 7v, so I thought the 7-9v would pull in at like 4v or 5v, it seems to be more like 9v though, so that will be beyond WOT.

I might go exchange it for 275-240... 5v/1A, hopefully it can handle up to 8.4v and however many amps the crawler motor will draw at WOT in a bind. If radio shack doesn't have what I need, I might have to order something, but it would be nice to have it now.

the dud dig requires the third channel to operate a switch, I want a relay to control the switching.
 
Last edited:
Ok, will this work (if I get a relay that activates at the right voltage)

HomemadeDrag.png


Anything wrong in the above diagram?

Supposedly, when the throttle is applied, it will power the coil, which disconnects the NC and Common poles (and connects the NO and Common Poles) to allow all electricity to flow to the motors, when throttle is let off (neutral) position, the coil switches back to connect the NC and Common poles, which connects the positive and negative wires of the motor.

The only thing I am wondering is that since the same wires that power the motor are disconnected when the relay is in rest, will it even complete a circuit to be able to energize the coil when throttle is applied, or if it will, will it really connect the motor wires at rest?
 
According to your pic the moment you apply throttle if the coil does not energize you will be shorting out the ESC +- through the Common and NC posts.

And yes, at rest the motor wires will be connected. But so will the ESC wires.
 
Last edited:
According to your pic the moment you apply throttle if the coil does not energize you will be shorting out the ESC +- through the Common and NC posts.

And yes, at rest the motor wires will be connected. But so will the ESC wires.

Ok, so is there a way to do this? or will I just need to try the 5V relay?
Through testing the truck doesn't even start to move unless at least 5V is applied to the motor, so will it be ok? Is there a better way to wire it?

Is there such a thing as a 1V Pull-In/Drop-Out relay that can handle the amperage I would be putting into it? This way it activates earlier?

I'd hate to fry my ESC in trying this, so all help is appreciated.
 
Not sure exactly what you are trying to achieve with this "mod" - if you are just trying to add "dead-short" drag brakes, they don't work at low speed.

If you are going to try this, I'd suggest using a DPDT relay to keep the power and brake circuits separate. Connect one common and it's corresponding NC terminal to the motor. Connect the other common to the ESC +ve motor output, the corresponding NO terminal to the motor +ve terminal.
This way, if the relay fails, you aren't left with a dead short on the motor at the same time as the ESC is applying power to the motor - that could kill the ESC.

To get over the "pull in" problem, you could try using a small relay connected to the ESC output and use that to pull in the main relay.
Wire the first relay's coil to the ESC output. Run a wire from the battery -ve to the first relay's common terminal , then from the NO to the second relay's coil, then to battery +ve.

Be aware that ESCs generally work by switching the power to the motor on and off at a high frequency, not by varying the voltage. The harder you pull the trigger, the longer the "on" period is compared to the "off" period (duty cycle). A relay might have problems coping with this.

I also thought that drag brakes just allowed a brushless setup to simulate the natural braking of a brushed motor?
If you want more drag brakes from a brushed motor, couldn't you just fit stronger brush springs (or a motor with stronger magnets) for more mechanical resistance to rotation?
 
Not sure exactly what you are trying to achieve with this "mod" - if you are just trying to add "dead-short" drag brakes, they don't work at low speed.

I'm looking for an inexpensive alternative to buying a "crawler" ESC that has drag brake (Tekin FX-R, Rooster, Goat, etc) because there have been situations where the crawler rolled downhill where a drag brake esc would have applied a brake to prevent the wheels from rolling.
I assumed any of the above ESCs in one way or another dead short the motor to obtain this. If I am wrong, I would love to know how they do it. My stock Axial ESC does have a brake feature, but it only works when I switch from throttle to reverse, and I'd have to hold it each time. I'd want essentially a "dead-mans-brake" something that applies this same braking technique unattended.

If you are going to try this, I'd suggest using a DPDT relay to keep the power and brake circuits separate. Connect one common and it's corresponding NC terminal to the motor. Connect the other common to the ESC +ve motor output, the corresponding NO terminal to the motor +ve terminal.
This way, if the relay fails, you aren't left with a dead short on the motor at the same time as the ESC is applying power to the motor - that could kill the ESC.

I definitely want to prevent a fried ESC, because then I will be forced to just go and buy a new one if it does fry. I don't see how the above wiring would work. There are only two wires at play here; ESC (-) and ESC (+) My problem was getting the relay to activate when throttle is removed to dead short the motor, and when throttle is applied it releases the dead short to allow everything to function as normal.

To get over the "pull in" problem, you could try using a small relay connected to the ESC output and use that to pull in the main relay.
Wire the first relay's coil to the ESC output. Run a wire from the battery -ve to the first relay's common terminal , then from the NO to the second relay's coil, then to battery +ve.
Pull in is actually very important, the problem I am having with the 9V relay that I got (275-005) is that it's pull in is too high. It activates beyond the range of throttle input. I tried a 12V automotive SPST NO relay, and it's pull in was lower, somewhere near 7V (don't have an exact figure) and it would activate when throttle is applied, and drop-out when throttle is removed. The problem was it was a NO rather than a NC relay.

Throttle input seemed to be between 5V and 8.4V (with a 2S lipo) at least when the crawler would even begin to move. So I need a relay that would activate within this range.
Example; radio shack PN 275-249, this relay has a Pick-up (pull in) voltage of 9.6V and a dropout of 0.6V. So this would be too high to have pull in to energize the coil. The dropout is nice, it won't release the relay until there's practically zero V or zero throttle input.
It's hard finding out the Pull-In (pick-up) ratings of relay since this is not as important for it's normal operation.

Be aware that ESCs generally work by switching the power to the motor on and off at a high frequency, not by varying the voltage. The harder you pull the trigger, the longer the "on" period is compared to the "off" period (duty cycle). A relay might have problems coping with this.

From my initial testing it seemed that at low throttle there was about 5.2 or so volts being applied to the motor, and at WOT whatever amount of V was in the batteries, 8.4 to 8.2 to 7.9 as the battery drained. So it would seem to me that the ESC varies the Voltage to the motor to modulate speed. Am I wrong?

I also thought that drag brakes just allowed a brushless setup to simulate the natural braking of a brushed motor?
If you want more drag brakes from a brushed motor, couldn't you just fit stronger brush springs (or a motor with stronger magnets) for more mechanical resistance to rotation?

Again, I've got an Axial 55t motor, sealed case, so changing anything about the motor is not optional.

A drag brake - according to the Novak Rooster Crawler "features"
Novak said:
High-power Drag Brakes provide monster holding power that’s especially useful when embarking on a downhill descent

I want to prevent unwanted motion on hills with a drag brake, but rather than spend about $100 or more to get a new ESC, I thought it was possible to get drag brake working for about $5 with relays.

It's strange that with as many veteran crawlers here, no one seems to understand my intentions, or what a drag brake is for in crawling.
Imagine this: Drive your crawler down a 45 degree slope, let off the throttle. What happens? If it continues rolling (like mine will) it doesn't have drag brake, if it stops, it has drag brake and will help prevent penalty points in a competition.
I had exactly this scenario. I hit a gate because the crawler kept moving on a descent, had I not hit this gate, I would have received a 0 score for the course, but because I don't have drag brake, I got a 10 for the course.

I would have thought someone else figured this out before, because there hasn't always been drake brake capable crawler escs. What did you all do in the "golden" days of crawling when it was "built not bought"?
 
From my initial testing it seemed that at low throttle there was about 5.2 or so volts being applied to the motor, and at WOT whatever amount of V was in the batteries, 8.4 to 8.2 to 7.9 as the battery drained. So it would seem to me that the ESC varies the Voltage to the motor to modulate speed. Am I wrong?


I would have thought someone else figured this out before, because there hasn't always been drake brake capable crawler escs. What did you all do in the "golden" days of crawling when it was "built not bought"?

Have you tested the output without a motor. My FXR reads from less than 1V to over 8v when testing without a motor hooked up.

Your motor is also part of the problem with week springs and magnets. You could try gearing down. Get the smallest pinion and largest spur you can fit. Learn to control the throttle. You can also dile in some reverse trim to apply the brakes gently for down hill driving.
 
What did you all do in the "golden" days of crawling when it was "built not bought"?

Planned ahead, meaning don't plan to stop on the downhill, use the brakes all the way down the hill, then stop. The Novak Super Rooster was great for that with it's Smart Braking.

Then came dragging the rear tires locked up when we all got our digs on the trucks.

And when the brushless bandwagon came through those ESCs had an adjustable drag brake so everyone jumped on board. Then the brushed ESCs figured it out and here we are.

Personally I don't like a drag brake that is so strong it can hold me on a hill. I like to use mine as a light braking and slowly coast down hills. Maybe that's just my style I developed from not having a drag brake back in the day.

I think I just learned something.

8)
 
Have you tested the output without a motor. My FXR reads from less than 1V to over 8v when testing without a motor hooked up.

Your motor is also part of the problem with week springs and magnets. You could try gearing down. Get the smallest pinion and largest spur you can fit. Learn to control the throttle. You can also dile in some reverse trim to apply the brakes gently for down hill driving.

Reverse trim is what I used to use, but if I am pointed up a hill, reverse trim actually pulls it back down, and guess what, a reverse penalty is awarded.

I'm going to try one of the other relays. I think this can work, I just have to try it.
 
you will probably spend more money on blown relays and solder, shrink wrap if you are doing it correctly than a new esc will cost:roll:, save your nickles and buy a used one they are not really all THAT much money, it is cool that you are trying to re invent the wheel, but not necessarily needed
 
If you want a brake that'll hold you on a hill, a dead short won't do it. You need an active circuit that actually powers the motor. Easy to build into a sensored brushless system, no idea how they do it with a brushed or sensorless system.



A dead short is very effective at mid to high motor speeds, gets worse as the motor slows down, and will do absolutely nothing at zero rpm. This method is used for slotcar racing - let go of the trigger and you short out the track rails.
Before you spend more time or cash with relays, test it out by making a jumper cable to join the 2 motor terminals together with the ESC disconnected. You won't notice any difference until your crawler is rolling fast.

Your only real options are:

Use the throttle to apply power to prevent roll back

Get a motor with more mechanical drag

Get a new ESC with the features that you need.


When you test an ESC's output with a meter, it may look like you are getting 1 or 2v, buts that's because the meter is measuring the average voltage over time. The voltage is switching much too fast for a normal DVM to measure correctly.
In reality, it's switching the full battery voltage something like 2000 times per second. It's the ratio of 8.4v periods to 0v periods that determines the speed of the motor.

Seems wrong, and I took some convincing about this. They do it this way because it's far more efficient than dropping the voltage. Longer running time and much cooler than using a voltage regulator. A traditional voltage regulator capable of supplying 20-100 amps would be huge compared to a modern switching ESC.
 
Brushed can have active hold brakes too. My new ESC has a feature with it, along with normal drag brakes.


So I am guessing you only have a two channel radio to work with? Maybe PunkRC has a solution for you?
 
I think I am going to give up on this. as clockworks said, it's probably going to be too hard to do. I'm just gonna save my pennies and learn to deal with the lack of drag brake for now.@jrh - I've got a modded TQ3 for the dig, but no spare channels.I'm just gonna save up and get a Tekin FX-R, probably a 55T combo.Thanks for the help with this.
 
I've got an AX-10.

3 Channel TX/RX, TQ3 modded so that the 3rd channel is three positions with end point adjustments to prevent burning out the dig servo. Here's my TQ3 post, and my crawler build.

Channel 1 - Steering servo
Channel 2 - Throttle (ESC)
Channel 3 - Dig Servo

I've got a homemade dig attached to the rear side of the axial transmission, and a standard servo to shift it, so when I flick the red switch, it shift between 4WD and Dig. When I flick the silver toggle switch, it shifts into Freewheel. I am trading my Traxxas 4-tec for an Eritex Dig though, so I will have a better quality dig.

The DUD dig is for MOA rigs, I've got a shafty. I was wanting to make a drag brake to do the same as the expensive ESCs. Out crawling today it's apparent that reverse trim is not even close to enough to solve my problem, if I'm heading uphill, and don't want to slide back, I'll have to keep my hand on the throttle just enough to keep it planted without allowing it to roll back.
 
Back
Top