Shafty pro class

[rock hard]

There are 2 arguments going on here. If we want to grow the sport some sort of limted spec class will help. There ARE guys right now custom making parts for a class that does not even exist on the national event level yet.

Not everyone is going to be happy. Forget that one. If people want to run a shafty class then lets have at it. Same rules as 2.2 pro. Then we get to use more stuff we have laying around. Body, no body, as long as it would pass in 2.2 pro, its good. Same wheelbase, same width. Only one change to the rules.

One Motor, One servo. Its that simple.



It could be called 2.2.1

I would agree with this statement,sounds like a win-win for everyone.

 

[Duuuuuuuude]

There are 2 arguments going on here. If we want to grow the sport some sort of limted spec class will help. There ARE guys right now custom making parts for a class that does not even exist on the national event level yet.

Not everyone is going to be happy. Forget that one. If people want to run a shafty class then lets have at it. Same rules as 2.2 pro. Then we get to use more stuff we have laying around. Body, no body, as long as it would pass in 2.2 pro, its good. Same wheelbase, same width. Only one change to the rules.

One Motor, One servo. Its that simple.




It could be called 2.2.1

"thumbsup"

 

[bob1961]

Personally I don't see the difference between a sportsman class and a shafty pro class. Sportsman (at least in our area) is open to everyone. Besides that our sportsman turn out at events are pretty low and is Shafty only. I can't see anyone making a distinction between the two "shafty" classes.

shafty pro is allowed to use dig as sportsman is not.......bob

....