• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Trade for RC Cars?

No, not entirely, and I didn't imply that they were.
I know. However, anyone that watches even the slightest amount of TV has seen commercials where some local lawyer has started a class action lawsuit against a pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturing company because their device isnt perfect. These companies arent looking to get sued and lose their asses....
 
Not really. What is her ailment?
i didnt ask what the exact form of cancer it is but she hasnt been able to eat for a few monthes and i think is pretty much in palative now, the theory for the therapy is ithat some cancers or in general a form of fungus or simular in that the cells die if the ph is high
here is something i pulled off the net i,m not vouching for it but its a general idea simular to what we are talking about at work with the boss regarding his friend
Killing Cancer Cells with High pH Therapy
 
Tiny little print on the side of a joint..."Like, this shit might harm you somehow man....".....maybe with a picture of Tommy Chong. :lol:

Sure, just like every pill you take has a warning label printed directly on it. ;-)

I know. However, anyone that watches even the slightest amount of TV has seen commercials where some local lawyer has started a class action lawsuit against a pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturing company because their device isnt perfect. These companies arent looking to get sued and lose their asses....

That's because pharmaceutical companies don't disclose all of the adverse side effects, because either they don't know, aren't telling, or are denying it.

Have you noticed these past few years that tv and newsprint ads are a lot more forthcoming about the potential risks than they used to be?
 
i didnt ask what the exact form of cancer it is but she hasnt been able to eat for a few monthes and i think is pretty much in palative now, the theory for the therapy is ithat some cancers or in general a form of fungus or simular in that the cells die if the ph is high
here is something i pulled off the net i,m not vouching for it but its a general idea simular to what we are talking about at work with the boss regarding his friend
Killing Cancer Cells with High pH Therapy
Interesting, I had not seen that before. The last part of the article caught my eye.....most of my radiobiology books discuss the Oxygen Enhancement Ratio and how to treat the tumor accordingly.
 
Sure, just like every pill you take has a warning label printed directly on it. ;-)



That's because pharmaceutical companies don't disclose all of the adverse side effects, because either they don't know, aren't telling, or are denying it.

Have you noticed these past few years that tv and newsprint ads are a lot more forthcoming about the potential risks than they used to be?
Haha....have you ever received a medical treatment? Do you remember the consent forms that you signed? They cover everything from "you might get a pimple" to "you might die a horrible and painful death". That is for one reason....every human is different and will react differently to therapy.

BTW, I agree with you that pharmaceutical companies should put their products through more testing and that our government should hold them to higher standards. However, then we'd have the conspiracy theorists in here saying that they are holding products back on us......oh wait.....
 
Interesting, I had not seen that before. The last part of the article caught my eye.....most of my radiobiology books discuss the Oxygen Enhancement Ratio and how to treat the tumor accordingly.
ya i was just looking at another wp on the topic and it also related the oxygen thing and how it relates to the bodys ph this page is mostly about foods or diet more akaline = better oxygenation
http://www.chimachine4u.com/AA.htmlsome
hmm different info out there some for and some think no merit
 
Haha....have you ever received a medical treatment? Do you remember the consent forms that you signed? They cover everything from "you might get a pimple" to "you might die a horrible and painful death". That is for one reason....every human is different and will react differently to therapy.

BTW, I agree with you that pharmaceutical companies should put their products through more testing and that our government should hold them to higher standards. However, then we'd have the conspiracy theorists in here saying that they are holding products back on us......oh wait.....

I've had a few trips to the hospital and done the paperwork. But there is a difference between a bad/unforeseen reaction and carelessness.

Yes they should, and I would rather they hold back stuff to further refine it than hurry it to market and see what happens...
 
If had a few trips to the hospital and done the paperwork.
I'm not talking about a broken bone....I am talking about a lifesaving procedure in which there is a good chance that you might die. The two are quite different and neither the doctors nor their treatments, just like anything in life, are perfect.

Yes they should, and I would rather they hold back stuff to further refine it than hurry it to market and see what happens...
This reminds me of a saying my dad used to tell his customers (he owned an AC repair business) when I was a boy..."you have three choices with my service, fast, good, cheap.....you only get to pick two"
"thumbsup"
 
I derail a simple thread commenting that the whole Medical Pot issue is funded and pushed by a bunch of stoners that have no interest in the true medical uses, but just want to get high without worrying about getting busted, and look where we are now :lmao:
 
BTW anyone watching the Curiosity thats on right now (science channel)? They are doing real time tests on how drugs including pot affect people in real world situations and how it affects their bodies? Pretty timely
 
I derail a simple thread commenting that the whole Medical Pot issue is funded and pushed by a bunch of stoners that have no interest in the true medical uses, but just want to get high without worrying about getting busted, and look where we are now :lmao:
Dont let your head get too big.....we've had this discussion before plenty of times without you...
 
I've worked for a Medical Supply/Pharmaceutical company for the past 8 years, and I can promise you one thing in regards to testing for adverse reactions...

there's no realistic way to test long enough to cover ALL possible outcomes. It would be too costly, take too long, and by the time the particular drug was given FDA approval, it would cost $1000 a pill. I will admit, there is a rush of sorts to get products to the market, but I can promise you that the FDA requirements are long and strict and they increase in difficulty each year. To get a 510k (FDA approval for medical device sales) in 2011 was exponentially more difficult than in 2001.

A good rule of thumb is to acknowledge and accept that anytime you ingest something, especially a man-made pharmaceutical, there is an inherent risk involved. An open-ended inherent risk. Even with something as simple as ibuprofen. Take Advil continuously on a long enough timeline and you'll likely go into kidney failure due to elevated creatinine levels.

It's a roll of the dice you could say. Wish it was different, but for now, it's the best we've got. "thumbsup"
 
For some reason this add caught my eye:

rc collection

So Scott, how much weed did you trade him for all that RC stuff??? Hope you didn't leave San Diego to become a dealer.
I've always remembered a quote from someone saying "watch out RC costs more than drugs" - I'm starting to believe this, because I can find hardcore drugs and assault rifles easier than a set of 300's for my berg. LOL Hope Washington is treating you well.
 
So Scott, how much weed did you trade him for all that RC stuff??? Hope you didn't leave San Diego to become a dealer.
I've always remembered a quote from someone saying "watch out RC costs more than drugs" - I'm starting to believe this, because I can find hardcore drugs and assault rifles easier than a set of 300's for my berg. LOL Hope Washington is treating you well.

LOL, I know what you are saying, if I wanted to be a dope dealer I could have just moved to O.B. WA is ok, crawling is kinda thin where I am, gotta go east of Seattle, its like of like driving to an OC or SoCal comp. How are you guys doing down there?

WOW, I really can't believe how this thread has blown up! I just thought it was funny, someone looking to trade their RCs for dope. Of course I have no idea what his real medical status is, if he is a stoner or someone who really needs it. But, there are easier ways to get dope than to sell your toys, he could just go where I grew up, the land of the Giant Redwood and wild sensimilla... Growing up, the stuff was all around, but somehow I escaped my teenage years without ever smoking it, likely because I can't stand the smell...

Right now, I guess there are two things keeping me off dope:
1- I like being employed "thumbsup"

2- I don't want to get rid of my RCs to get it "thumbsup"
 
Last edited:
The Shafer report

Does anyone remember this report and the coverup that followed, thank you Mr. Nixon;

The "Shafer Commission" made an incredibly thorough examination of all facets of cannabis use and prohibition. They received testimony from police, judges, doctors, politicians, students, lawyers, clinicians and many others, producing thousands of pages of transcripts. They also commissioned dozens of surveys, studies and projects, and travelled to many other nations to examine their cultural and social mores in relation to cannabis.
Despite their initial anti-pot leanings, the commission ultimately bowed to the weight of the evidence, and issued a remarkably tolerant and accurate report. The commission report, titled Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding, found that marijuana use caused "no significant physical, biochemical, or mental abnormalities," and that "most users, young and old, demonstrate an average or above-average degree of social functioning, academic achievement, and job performance."
The report also found that marijuana did not cause violent behavior, did not lead to heroin or other drugs, and concluded that "neither the marihuana user nor the drug itself can be said to constitute a danger to public safety." The commission found that the evidence on marijuana "does not justify a social policy designed to seek out and firmly punish those who use it."
The report recommended that "Federal and state laws be changed to no longer make it a crime to possess marijuana for private use. State laws should make the public use of marijuana a criminal offense punishable by a $100 fine. Under federal law, marijuana smoked in public would merely be subject to seizure."
These findings were not what Nixon had wanted to hear. The tapes reveal that Nixon had put immense pressure on Shafer to have the commission's findings back Nixon's drug war, telling him "keep your commission in line."
"You're enough of a pro," Nixon told a nervous Shafer, "to know that for you to come out with something that would run counter to what the Congress feels and what the country feels and what we're planning to do, would make your Commission just look bad as hell."
When he learned that the commission was going to recommend decriminalization despite his efforts, Nixon told his advisor Bob Haldeman how they would counteract the commission report. "I want a goddamn strong statement about marijuana," growled Nixon. "I mean one on marijuana that just tears the ass out of them."
Ultimately, Nixon ignored the Shafer commission, punishing Shafer by dead-ending his career and blocking him from further promotion. Nixon followed through on his threat to wage a real drug war; marijuana arrests skyrocketed during his tenure, jumping by over 130,000 between 1972 and 1973, totalling over 420,000 arrests



The rest of this article can be read at this link;
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/2500.html
 
Last edited:
Back
Top