montana.matt
RCC Addict
5ther must be a bottle of what wovereene is sipping on right now..... no idea what a 8ther is:lol:what the hell is a 5ther and an 8ther?
5ther must be a bottle of what wovereene is sipping on right now..... no idea what a 8ther is:lol:what the hell is a 5ther and an 8ther?
tell me about it, i think somewhere in these posts people started thinkn that i said 2.2 crawlers sucked.....i simply asked the question what people had against the summit and than it got interesting with attitudes...
traxxas summit iS everything a crawler is....and then some
You're not listening, we don't have anything against the Summit, except the fact you call it a CRAWLER, which it isn't. Now if you had said it's a great basher, we would have agreed.tell me about it, i think somewhere in these posts people started thinkn that i said 2.2 crawlers sucked.....i simply asked the question what people had against the summit and than it got interesting with attitudes...
5ther must be a bottle of what wovereene is sipping on right now..... no idea what a 8ther is:lol:
ididsay my summit could do he course of a 2.2 and none of this really changes that....... rules, laws, all designed to make a goal so technical....if there are obsticles, there is no reason other than shear girth at the starting line that a summit would not perform well...tell me about it, i think somewhere in these posts people started thinkn that i said 2.2 crawlers sucked.....i simply asked the question what people had against the summit and than it got interesting with attitudes...
You're not listening, we don't have anything against the Summit, except the fact you call it a CRAWLER, which it isn't. Now if you had said it's a great basher, we would have agreed.
Maybe GREAT basher and MEDIOCRE crawler (at best):mrgreen:You're not listening, we don't have anything against the Summit, except the fact you call it a CRAWLER, which it isn't. Now if you had said it's a great basher, we would have agreed.
There are plenty of reasons it would not perform well, design is one of them, and the tires suck.if there are obsticles, there is no reason other than shear girth at the starting line that a summit would not perform well...
dang i didnt think of that. yup typical noob moveThis thread is probably the most hilarious method of getting your post count up I've ever seen. Too bad it'll probably get moved to chit chat!
!
you would actallybuild a course for a summit to compete against a2.2..
That's pushing itMEDIOCRE crawler (at best):mrgreen:
always gets personal when things get interesting..... what kind of iQ gets personal..I think it has something more to do with his IQ or GPA.
Just curious, how old are you?
:lol:That's pushing it![]()
hmm.....cant say agree with that, the tires on the thing have a good smear...... siping does help and there are softer compounds but i was actually surprised by the stock...There are plenty of reasons it would not perform well, design is one of them, and the tires suck.
old enough to have built 1:1 rigs and go on several "CRAWLING" events..... i know what the hell crawling is....???
Are you friends with rccrawlerboy?
If you really think the tires are good and "sticky", I'm truly sorry.hmm.....cant say agree with that, the tires on the thing have a good smear...... siping does help and there are softer compounds but i was actually surprised by the stock...