• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

twin turbo super Cuda Vs Enzo Ferrair

I already know I'm gonna get kicked square in the balls for this...

But ill take the enzo...


I'm a ferrari nut, and that enzo is bitchin
 
I dunno what to think other than that Cuda must be making some ridiculous power. And by ridiculous, I mean SERIOUSLY FREAKING RIDICULOUS POWER!!!!!!!

Like, probably more than they say.

LMC does super nice work. I bet the price tag on the Cuda is close to that of the Enzo.

Now let's see them throw the same treatment into a Daytona or Superbird. :mrgreen:

Hell yeah, and take it to Bonneville where it can really run "thumbsup"

I don't think they were hitting 200mph back then? 160-170's maybe?

160-170 for the "normal" cars. The aero nose was a big help. The wing on the back was so tall because they had to be able to get the trunk open on the street cars.

NASCAR was actually cool and somewhat relevant back then.

I already know I'm gonna get kicked square in the balls for this...

But ill take the enzo...

And do what with it? At least the Cuda has a trunk.
 
Pshhhhh.... cruise at 45 on the interstate like everyone else that owns an exotic does... what good is it to have the most capable car ever concieved if you can't cruise at 45 in a 70 while getting passed by yugo's and geo metro's
 
Back
Top