StomperCrawler
RCC Addict
This is to help the designers figure out what to focus on. Maybe after this we'll have a "What's second-most important" poll... or if Rich wants he can do it simultaneously.
I think it's possible to fix most of this ourselves, (i.e. bumpstops inside the shock bodies to shorten them) although it would be great if the Ascender 2.0 arrived without any issues; maybe v3.0? LOLZ I guess I'm saying that if we can fix it ourselves without too much trouble or expense, maybe we should focus our votes on things that are more difficult/time-consuming/expensive to fix; just a suggestion.
BTW, the reason I voted for torque twist is because it's tough for end-users to fix without negatively affecting the rig's performance. For example, if we preload one or two shock(s) to reduce it, the rig becomes unbalanced for handling rocks and doing sidehilling.
Update: What's a thread without a glam shot?!?
I think it's possible to fix most of this ourselves, (i.e. bumpstops inside the shock bodies to shorten them) although it would be great if the Ascender 2.0 arrived without any issues; maybe v3.0? LOLZ I guess I'm saying that if we can fix it ourselves without too much trouble or expense, maybe we should focus our votes on things that are more difficult/time-consuming/expensive to fix; just a suggestion.

BTW, the reason I voted for torque twist is because it's tough for end-users to fix without negatively affecting the rig's performance. For example, if we preload one or two shock(s) to reduce it, the rig becomes unbalanced for handling rocks and doing sidehilling.
Update: What's a thread without a glam shot?!?

Last edited: