|
View Poll Results: Which non-dig class should we run in 2012? | |||
1.9 pro | 1 | 7.69% | |
2.2 sportsman | 5 | 38.46% | |
both | 7 | 53.85% | |
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-19-2011, 03:01 PM | #1 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
| 1.9 pro or 2.2 sportsman in 2012?
What would you guys like to see? Due to the size of our club I was thinking that it would be a good idea to focus on one or the other. We might even see some new people pop-up. All throughout the 2011 season we had 2-3 1.9 drivers and 2-3 2.2 sporty drivers per comp. Maybe those numbers will double if we cut one out? Just and idea. Which is it? Post up what and why you voted. I'm going for 2.2 sporty. I like that that I could use the same wheels tires and foams that I use on my comp 2.2. The aftermarket is also much more extensive for 2.2s. discuss. |
Sponsored Links | |
10-19-2011, 03:15 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Castle Rock, WA
Posts: 8,785
|
You left out the "None" or "No new additions" option in your poll. But you might want it to be "2.2 shafty" or "2.2 Sportsman". Sportsman and shafty are two different classes IMO. Just cause the truck has driveshafts doesn't mean the driver is a new to the sport or the truck is entry level. Cause you know competitive guys like to build super trick 2.2 drive shaft driven trucks and do almost the same as MOA's in the "sportsman" class. I'm just sayin'. |
10-19-2011, 03:23 PM | #3 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: roland,ar
Posts: 5,981
|
50/50... |
10-19-2011, 03:25 PM | #4 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
| Quote:
| |
10-19-2011, 03:26 PM | #5 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
| |
10-19-2011, 03:32 PM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: southaven
Posts: 1,934
|
2.2 sportsman, it is NO dig and that makes it a drivers class.
|
10-19-2011, 03:35 PM | #7 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Castle Rock, WA
Posts: 8,785
| Quote:
Cause you know (and you know you know), Good drivers with nice 2.2 shaft driven trucks will still dominate that "sporty" or "shaft" class, hince still leaving newer drivers in the back of the pack. | |
10-19-2011, 03:40 PM | #8 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
| Quote:
That's how things were when I started running the pro class, even before moas were dominating the scene. A beginner has to start somewhere. Just my thoughts. Did you take 1st place at your 1st comp? | |
10-19-2011, 03:43 PM | #9 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Castle Rock, WA
Posts: 8,785
| Quote:
Guess I am just a little confused about the definition of "sportsman" So, I'll pick 2.2 sportsman then. | |
10-19-2011, 03:51 PM | #10 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
| Quote:
| |
10-19-2011, 04:31 PM | #11 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: poteau
Posts: 996
|
i would think the 2.2 sporty class would be better. altho i still don't qualify. the ability to kinda swap parts from a comp rig to a sportsman would be nice. sure wish the wraith was comp legal. guess i'll just stick running with the scalers.
|
10-19-2011, 05:26 PM | #12 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
| Quote:
2.3 - Class 2 – Class 2.2: ▪ 2.3.1 - Vehicle wheelbase is limited to a maximum of 12.5 inches. ▪ 2.3.2 - Vehicle track width is limited to a maximum of 12.5 inches. This is determined by measuring the bottom of the outer most edge of the front and rear tires while the vehicle is sitting on level ground. ▪ 2.3.3 - Vehicle is limited to 2.2 inch wheels/rims or smaller at the bead surface. Wheels may be modified provided that the tire bead surface does not exceed 2.2 inches in diameter. With a tire mounted no exterior component of the wheel including but not limited to the bead lock ring shall exceed 2.55". Tires may be modified from other sized tires using only a pliable rubber but must not exceed a total uncompressed outer diameter of 6 inches. ▪ 2.3.4 - Vehicles are limited to 2-wheel steering only. ▪ 2.3.5 - 2.2 Crawler class bodiless 8" overall length, 3" overall width, and 3.75" overall height. ▪ 2.3.6 - Bodied vehicles must be 3” minimum height on sides. No less than 12.5” total length and full original width, and no less than 5” in center. | |
10-19-2011, 06:41 PM | #13 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Lowell, Arkansas
Posts: 1,307
|
I'd like to see both 1.9 and "pro shafty" run at club comps whenever there's 3 or more entries. Of course pro shafty would be easier to run at comps since the courses would be the exactly same as pro 2.2. IMO, a true "sportsman" class should be "run whatcha brung" class to attract the new guys, let them run whatever they may have. That's what we do up here at NWARC when some new guys show up. I know I'd hate to have to run against Ashton and Shane in "sportsman"......... |
10-19-2011, 06:53 PM | #14 |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
|
Get rid of that name sportsman. 1.9 or 2.2 Shafty/2.2S pro The word sportsman should be replaced with novice. The word novice sounds more comfortable to a new guy. We let them run what ever they got on the same courses as us. we give the 60 point out , let them use the 20pt bypass rule and give them more time. We had novices finish courses that we didn't, because they had the extra time and points. |
10-19-2011, 07:20 PM | #15 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: poteau
Posts: 996
|
being new to this i would love to see a "run what ya brung" class. rules being 2 wheel steering, and 2.2 (or less) tires. i bought the wraith because i wasn't planning on competing and really didn't think much of that was going on around here. i mostly trial ride and play around on the rocks. with a class geared more toward the novice, and not requiring us to modify our beginner vehicles to compete, i think you would get more people showing up. i would love to try comping, but i'm not going to shorten my wraith to do it. i like it the way it is. maybe i just need to buy a rig and set it up for comps. but until i could try it and see if i like it, i'm not going to fork out the dough. |
10-19-2011, 07:52 PM | #16 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: roland,ar
Posts: 5,981
| |
10-19-2011, 07:52 PM | #17 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: roland,ar
Posts: 5,981
| |
10-19-2011, 10:00 PM | #18 |
Newbie Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Van Buren
Posts: 2
|
I've got a Losi 2.2
|
10-20-2011, 08:32 AM | #19 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: southaven
Posts: 1,934
|
Ok how's this 2.2 shafty No dig class. Anyone can run call it whatever you want, if only 3 people show up then its not worth the drive for me.
|
10-20-2011, 11:06 AM | #20 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: roland,ar
Posts: 5,981
| |
| |