11-16-2009, 03:19 PM | #1 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Tulsa
Posts: 154
| Shocks
The axial scx10 shocks are 100mm right? if i were to install 1.55 wheel and tire setup and run rc4wd 80mm springs, would i have to do any other mods to accommodate the new set up?
|
Sponsored Links | |
11-17-2009, 11:36 AM | #2 |
I joined the Band! Join Date: May 2009 Location: anaheim
Posts: 155
|
I think the stockers are 90mm
|
11-17-2009, 11:59 AM | #3 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Tulsa
Posts: 154
|
hmm, so maybe so the 80s should be good, but not much lower... I basically just want a more scale look but still with the crawler theme. Ive got the f350 tamiya top, and i think it needs a less aggressive stance
|
11-17-2009, 12:02 PM | #4 |
I joined the Band! Join Date: May 2009 Location: anaheim
Posts: 155
|
from what I hear the 1.55's are the rim size but the tires are still 1.9
|
11-17-2009, 12:12 PM | #5 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Tulsa
Posts: 154
|
hmm, theres a pic somewhere on here with 1.55s on a stock tr and they look a hair smaller, ill have to find that thread again
|
11-17-2009, 12:20 PM | #6 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Tulsa
Posts: 154
|
maybe its the noshine look of the 1.55s that made them look smaller to me before, but now they do seem pretty close to 1.9 RC4WD 1.5 Tire Choice for my SCX10 TR |
11-17-2009, 12:41 PM | #7 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Moncton, NB, Canada
Posts: 1,962
|
They look a hair smaller because they are, the Rock Stompers and Mud Slingers in 1.55" size have an outside diameter of 4.13", whereas the Proline Flat Irons have an OD of 4.2".
|
11-17-2009, 05:00 PM | #8 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Tulsa
Posts: 154
|
hmm, well i dont think that is enough of a difference for me to spend so much money on then lol
|
11-18-2009, 08:04 PM | #9 |
Newbie Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: newbedford
Posts: 36
|
1.5 and 1.9 are close in size but 1.5 look more real
|
| |