| |
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-27-2011, 06:03 PM
| #1 |
| Newbie Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: sacramento
Posts: 37
|  gang greens dovetailed bronco POOR BOY CRAWLER
So i took the foams out of the tires put 30 pennies in the front tires and 15 in the rear moved the rear shock tower closer to the center of truck lower stance without losing articulation moved electronics to the back ... kinda looks like a gas tank lol oh and i have put the longer stock trailing arms on the rear with the 3 link and the front has axial metal links ..bent lowewr arms obviously and its 4 linked up front got rid of the duct tape too                           |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
01-27-2011, 08:43 PM
| #2 |
| Newbie Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: St. Clairsville
Posts: 41
|
looks good! i like the low stance!
|
|
| |
|
01-27-2011, 08:49 PM
| #3 |
| Newbie Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: sacramento
Posts: 37
| thanx
thats what i was goin for without having a droop set up ... not they are bad or sumthin but i personally dont like em on a scale rig oh and the tires barely rub at full articulation/flex it works sweet i want to get some 2.2 roc lox but idk if they would look good or be way to big what do u think |
|
| |
|
01-28-2011, 12:41 AM
| #4 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Lodi
Posts: 345
|
I think the 2.2 Rok Loks would look a bit too big because of the lower stance... I guess the only way to find out is to do it. Post pics if you do, id like to see how it looks!
|
|
| |
|
01-28-2011, 01:12 PM
| #5 |
| I joined the Band! Join Date: May 2009 Location: lake county ,florida
Posts: 1,237
|
looks great without tape
|
|
| |
|
01-30-2011, 10:39 PM
| #6 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: May 2010 Location: Phx
Posts: 193
|
That's a great looking bronco!!! But I'm sucker for a ford, let alone a dovetailed bronco.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Linear Mode
