Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Miscellaneous > Chit Chat
Loading

Notices

Thread: Hybrid Four Link Independent Supsension

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2007, 08:07 PM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 442
Default Hybrid Four Link Independent Supsension

So maybe I've been using too much superglue again, but I came up with another thought ad wanted to see what you guys think. What about build a hybrid crawler that had working independent suspension and a four link, and I'm not talking about indy front four link rear. What you would do is take the diffs and arms and stuff from a Maxx, attach four links to the diff housing, attach shocks from the a-arms to the diff housing like normal and shocks from the links to the chassis. That way the arms can flex independently and the entire thing can move up and down like a four link. Thoughts?
Rudukai13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-18-2007, 08:11 PM   #2
REST IN ALOHA CHIP
 
YoUnG_vErSiOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: *
Posts: 3,549
Default

Torque Twist!
YoUnG_vErSiOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 08:17 PM   #3
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 442
Default

Huh? Care to elaborate?
Rudukai13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 08:28 PM   #4
REST IN ALOHA CHIP
 
YoUnG_vErSiOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: *
Posts: 3,549
Default

not really. just think about it, if one of the most common problems w/straight front axle is torque twist using a typical 4 link imagine if you added two more fulcrums(pivot points) sure it would give more flex, but flex goes hand in hand with torque twist. if you try it you'll know whether or not this is true.
YoUnG_vErSiOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 08:29 PM   #5
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CoMo...Kickin it with Holmes Hobbies
Posts: 805
Default

ok yes it would work just like a maxx crawler...as for torque twist it would be no different than a normal super shafty crawler would exterience...but the only thing is is that the indy suspension would never actually compress...all the force would carry to the four-link suspesion...or at least most of it...i did this when i originally set up my maxx crawler...all you really get is more weight on the axles from the shocks...so its doable....good luck...
ROSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 08:30 PM   #6
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,032
Default

unnecessary, it would yield waaaaaayyy too much articulation. it would be uncontrollable.
dieselfuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 06:02 AM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MUSE, PA
Posts: 1,273
Default

i saw this done on a custom monster truck in a magazine once. it looked like it was EXTREMELY top heavy.
STEEL_CITY_CRAWLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 07:43 AM   #8
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 3,377
Default

Your better off locking the arms in the down position and making high clearence axles. Torque twist may not increase but would show quite a bit more with the added fulcrums as young version said.
Maybe if you put stops limiting pumpkin articulation so at a point it forces the a-arms to move. Also, you could rig up some kind of forced articulation system to deal with forcing an opposite tire down.
Thorsteenster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 04:53 PM   #9
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 338
Default

I think the reason most, if not all rock crawlers (scale and 1:1) use solid axles is because when an IFS moves up and down, your ground clearance decreases, which would tend to make you get caught up on rocks more. Indy susp is more for fast moving rigs where you want to minimize sprung weight so the suspension doesn't have to work as hard over big bumps and jumps.

The only problem I'd see with locking the axles in the down position and making a high clearance axle would be the drive line angle during articulation. I'm sure with r/c it wouldn't be THAT big a deal, but when the axle would articulate, the pumpkin would move far to one side, causing the drive line angle to increase more than with a standard straigh axle. In a standard stright axle, the drive line is centered on the axle so the change in angle is minimized.

I think the best thing for "drive over" ground clearance and still have gobs of articuation would be to go with lowered knuckles kinda like a unimog.
jbrandt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 07:20 PM   #10
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: rite here all along
Posts: 1,888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbrandt View Post
I think the reason most, if not all rock crawlers (scale and 1:1) use solid axles is because when an IFS moves up and down, your ground clearance decreases, which would tend to make you get caught up on rocks more. Indy susp is more for fast moving rigs where you want to minimize sprung weight so the suspension doesn't have to work as hard over big bumps and jumps.

The only problem I'd see with locking the axles in the down position and making a high clearance axle would be the drive line angle during articulation. I'm sure with r/c it wouldn't be THAT big a deal, but when the axle would articulate, the pumpkin would move far to one side, causing the drive line angle to increase more than with a standard straigh axle. In a standard stright axle, the drive line is centered on the axle so the change in angle is minimized.

I think the best thing for "drive over" ground clearance and still have gobs of articuation would be to go with lowered knuckles kinda like a unimog.

you are kidding right, a locked out indy susp would have a perfectly centered drive line and a real world straight axle is way off set to one side
halfcab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 09:38 PM   #11
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Out of my mind!!
Posts: 139
Default

I am unsure about its efficacy, but it seems interesting. I would say to install stiffer springs on the a-arms (original location) to make the 4-link part work also.
john alardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com