Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > Electronics
Loading

Notices

Thread: 2/3 nimh,regular nimh cells Im confused

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2009, 07:18 PM   #1
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Riverview
Posts: 60
Default 2/3 nimh,regular nimh cells Im confused

Im gonna get flamed in this section But,,Can someone explain this to me?
2/3 cells,,Im reading you charge them at a low amp rate .5-1.5 amps and
I am reading they are a bit smaller than sub c's,,less weight ?
and 1500mah capacity?
Tell me why people are using them over regular Nimh cells that
I can charge at 3 to 5 amps? and have a 3000 - 4700mah rating?
and seem tough as nails to me ?
Osco is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-07-2009, 07:27 PM   #2
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Rochelle
Posts: 363
Default

One simple reason is that they are smaller and take up less room. I made my self AA nimh 2700 hump packs for my truck and they work great. If you make you own packs it will save you. I payed 40$ for my three packs that would have cost 45$ per pack at cheap battery packs 135$
d-fly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 04:05 AM   #3
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 427
Default

in a nut shell- charge rate is selected by the mah rating of the cell.
allgm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 08:34 AM   #4
Official Cook of the ECC
 
Scattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hawthorne, Florida
Posts: 2,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osco View Post
Im gonna get flamed in this section But,,Can someone explain this to me?
2/3 cells,,Im reading you charge them at a low amp rate .5-1.5 amps and
I am reading they are a bit smaller than sub c's,,less weight ?
and 1500mah capacity?
Tell me why people are using them over regular Nimh cells that
I can charge at 3 to 5 amps? and have a 3000 - 4700mah rating?
and seem tough as nails to me ?

Because those big ass cells won't fit on a proper comp crawler. 2/3 cells are much easier to fit. Plus we crawlers don't need hours of runtime from a crawler pack. Also, they are just too damn heavy.

Add all these things up and it is easy to see why we use the smaller cells.

Now if you don't comp and just want some long runtimes you can do it if you can fit the sub C's on there.
Scattman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:50 PM   #5
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Riverview
Posts: 60
Default

Thanks Guys ,, Your makin me smarter,,,
Hey Its a hobby I just might make me a pack fo em for fun:XD
Osco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com