09-07-2008, 04:38 AM | #1 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 151
| Berg track width.
I realise that pretty much every berg build here has included offset wheels so the extra 1/2" must make a BIG difference in your comps. Is it just getting through the gates that's easier with a narrower track or does it also help in other ways. The reason I ask is because I only realised today that you guys have 16" min gates in 2.2 and 20" for super however in Australia it seems that the min gate width for All classes is 20". (I wish the guy who makes the rules in Australia would just run with exactly what the USRCCA uses) So if you only had to get through 20" gates would you still narrow your bergs? |
Sponsored Links | |
09-11-2008, 03:11 PM | #2 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: May 2006 Location: York Area
Posts: 258
| With a 20" gate width I wouldn't worry about narrowing the overall width. |
09-11-2008, 03:27 PM | #3 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: BFE, NV
Posts: 2,324
|
Tires close together help keep the axles off the rocks meaning less hang-ups especially when using aluminum axles. Most Bergs have a really low COG so a little narrower shouldnt hurt the stability too much.
|
09-11-2008, 06:13 PM | #4 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 151
| Quote:
| |
09-11-2008, 06:59 PM | #5 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: BV
Posts: 1,170
|
The better transverse breakover angle is a good reason to run narrow offset wheels, but also consider how much more leverage your servo will have on the tire with narrow offset wheels. Your servo doesn't have to work as hard, making it last longer and work better. The difference isn't actually all that huge, but if you want to win, little things can push you over the edge |
09-11-2008, 07:04 PM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: VARCOR
Posts: 1,826
|
With 20" gates, I vote for full width. The wider wheels would allow for more stability overall, and also more mounting locations for batts and servo as opposed to narrow wheels. Options for various mounts get real limited once you stick narrow wheels on. |
09-11-2008, 07:34 PM | #7 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2005 Location: CITY of CHAMPIONS!!
Posts: 2,086
|
i would probably run full width for more side hill and off camber stability.
|
09-11-2008, 07:44 PM | #8 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Henderson/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,032
|
to me its not about getting through gates. its the fact that if the rig is too wide the differentials will hang up more often.
|
09-11-2008, 07:57 PM | #9 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2005 Location: CITY of CHAMPIONS!!
Posts: 2,086
| true, but if the gates are wide enough you have more options on how to go through the gate not just barley fit, making it easier to navigate without getting hung up.
|
09-11-2008, 09:05 PM | #10 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: BFE, NV
Posts: 2,324
| |
09-11-2008, 09:15 PM | #11 | ||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Henderson/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,032
| Quote:
Quote:
ding ding ding!! the gates are only a small part of a course. sometimes (most of the time) getting through them is no problem, its getting to them that is the hard part. | ||
09-11-2008, 11:11 PM | #12 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 151
|
Ok, I think I have the answers I was looking for. Very early in the berg builds everyone started fitting narrows (mayhem started making specific wheels etc) and I read that this was all due to "wider isn't always better for a comp rig" I never understood why as it seemed ocm thought they were doing a favour making the axles wider, in the end only to be narrowed again by offset wheels. HR berg axles have put tried trumping berg on there earlier mistake with a narrower version berg copy. I didn't consider the transverse break over clearance at all, I was just thinking about side hill stability vs gate clearance. There is also the steering arm clearance with panthers issue and gear mounting room although even on my stick i don't have anything mounted on my front axle plates (i did have 2/3a's there but i'm yet to see if it was any advantage over a lipo between the front links and BB. Thanks for the info ppl, it's great. |
09-14-2008, 06:10 PM | #13 |
Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: united kingdom
Posts: 7
| proline 8 shooters
hey all, if anybody is looking at getting a set or have already got a set of Proline 8 shooters to alter the track width make sure you check that your wheel nuts are locking on the wheel and not the hex drive. mine stuck throught the wheel just enough to stop the nut locking on the wheel. we're all in the sh*t, it's only the depth that varies!!!! |
09-14-2008, 07:10 PM | #14 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 152
|
OC, Do we have a (one) guy here who makes the rules?? :-P I also believe when the idea of even going anywhere near the USRCCA rules was mentioned a large number of people got their knickers in a knot. I for one have been trying to change the gate width rule for 3 years now, I think 20" is way to wide, unfortunately I keep getting voted out (by the imaginable guys). Maybe you should raise this issue somewhere else for a more localised discussion on the topic. I can assure you right now you will have my vote for a 16" gate, I would even like to see it go down a little more. As you said, width will help with stability however I personally like a narrow comp rig, I feel the pros out way the cons. In fact I am having trouble coming to terms with the need to fit widners to the axial axles needed to clear the shocks with the new steering set up :-( But as mentioned, half the battle can be getting to the gate anyway. |
09-14-2008, 10:05 PM | #15 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 151
| Quote:
I'd be very happy if we followed the USRCCA rules to the letter, you'd have no complaints from me At least I know what rules i'll be driving to at the nat's this year, after that i'll worry about it when the time comes. | |
| |