09-22-2008, 06:22 PM | #1 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
| The Zero 4.0
Well I decided to switch over to the Zero 4.0 and the wider skid (I was running the narrower skid for the OCM) I am very happy with the change .It opened a little more room in between the chassis plates for a larger battery and allowed me to stand my shocks up more than the 3.5 chassis allowed with the 4 inch shocks and still keep a good low ride height. I also moved the ESC to the rear axle with the help of a Kamikaze Kustoms rear electronics mount.And I switched out my rear aluminum lower links to a set of Kamikaze Kustoms machined high clearance delrin links with revo ends. Here is a list of all the parts I used for this build. Kamikaze Kustoms 4.0 chassis Kamikaze Kustoms high clearance lower links Kamikaze Kustoms dig tray Kamikaze Kustoms delrin rear axle stay Berg axles Panther tires Mayhem eng. berg offset delrin 7's CC Sidewinder ESC CC BEC JRH hand wound 45T motors with stock pinions Hitec 5955 servo Thunder Power 2000mah 3cell lipo A few pics |
Sponsored Links | |
09-22-2008, 06:32 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Happiness is a warm AK.
Posts: 12,563
|
Looks great Joe! I was also contemplating running a wider skid. The normal skid is a bit tight for some of the larger lipo packs needed when running a MOA setup. |
09-22-2008, 06:33 PM | #3 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: southaven
Posts: 1,934
|
looks good joe |
09-22-2008, 07:04 PM | #4 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Trussville, AL
Posts: 1,762
|
Looks great Joe. I am liking the advantage of being able to stand the shocks up a little more and avoid any binding issues that the 3.5 has (but it still works great)
|
09-22-2008, 07:05 PM | #5 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
| Quote:
There is not a ton of difference the original skid was about 45mm and the current skid is 50mm There was just enough difference to allow me to go from a TP 1320 3cell to a TP 2000mah 3cell. I was having issues with the smaller battery keeping up with the increased draw of the JRH motors over the Integy motors.The new 2000mah should keep up just fine and is a extremely good fit.It is about 48mm wide and the same length and height as the 1320. | |
09-22-2008, 07:09 PM | #6 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
| Quote:
Personally I hate the loop on top of most shocks. It is now were near as smooth as a captured ball end . | |
09-22-2008, 07:17 PM | #7 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Detroit
Posts: 3,583
|
I have a question as My front shocks are mounted similarly. When you turn dont the tires rib the springs? I do think I'll be swapping to the 4.0 as well and doing those Traxxas cap mods to get rid of the fuel tube mounts. |
09-22-2008, 07:31 PM | #8 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
| Quote:
Yes they do rub but not enough to hurt any thing. | |
09-22-2008, 07:47 PM | #9 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
|
I have been using the JP customs 90mm's and drilling out the top loop to accept the berg rod ends, been working great for me, with no binding.
|
09-22-2008, 07:55 PM | #10 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
| |
09-22-2008, 08:29 PM | #11 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: southaven
Posts: 1,934
|
ok what do you have on the motor? |
09-22-2008, 08:31 PM | #12 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
| |
09-22-2008, 08:35 PM | #13 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Elberfeld
Posts: 2,085
| Quote:
The truck looks good Joe. | |
09-22-2008, 08:40 PM | #14 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
|
Paint can tops
|
09-22-2008, 08:40 PM | #15 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Elberfeld
Posts: 2,085
| |
09-22-2008, 08:45 PM | #16 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
|
Originally I was running the shocks like that just to get them out as far as I could for stability but now I have found out it helps on clearance for the new rear links. The chassis is about 30-35 thousands taller than the 3.5 i do believe. But I set the truck lower by a 1/4 so not much at all. I was also able to set the body lower by a 1/4 since I did not have to clear the ESC any more. |
09-22-2008, 08:49 PM | #17 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Elberfeld
Posts: 2,085
|
Awesome! Thanks!! I'm anxiously awaiting my 3.5 to arrive so I can get everything switched over and try one of these plastic chassis's!! |
09-22-2008, 08:49 PM | #18 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: southaven
Posts: 1,934
| |
09-22-2008, 08:52 PM | #19 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Trussville, AL
Posts: 1,762
| Quote:
I have my links and shocks set up basically the same. I found that spacing the shocks helps with the smoothness on compression and all the reasons joe stated above | |
09-22-2008, 08:53 PM | #20 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: southaven
Posts: 1,934
| |
| |