|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-29-2009, 05:39 PM | #1 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: EAST TN WHERE SHINE IS FREE
Posts: 242
| looking to redo my berg torsion chassis ??
Ok guys ive searched around a aot the last few days. Im wanting a new chassis for my berg .My current chassis is a dmg dcr Im looking to get away from the tuber and possibly get a JP Havok ,KK ST or T, or just stay sprung with a KK 3.5 , cdw chassis. what is the advatage of a torsion chassis? Im mostly looing for tech on chassis designs like front vs rear torsion and full torsion , ect
|
Sponsored Links | |
06-29-2009, 05:49 PM | #2 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 848
|
For the zero T Don't have to worry about shocks leaking. The stand offs are thinner than shocks. You can always cut the chassis down, add shocks and put in some braces. |
06-29-2009, 06:10 PM | #3 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: EAST TN WHERE SHINE IS FREE
Posts: 242
|
but what are the pros and cons of a zero t? is it just to get away from shocks or do they work better by applying more force to a certain wheel?
|
06-29-2009, 06:18 PM | #4 |
WOOPOOW!! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,218
|
I love my T buddy. Really doesnt have a con from my viewpoint, but im sure more people would go against that because they have broken them. My truck hasnt even come close to breaking yet and ive twisted it up in between 2 rocks and its been strong. |
06-29-2009, 07:43 PM | #5 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: T1E Country
Posts: 692
|
I have under 4 hours on my Zero-T and am very happy with it so far. I've had it twisted up pretty good and it just comes right back. I like running a little bit lighter weight rig so w/o shocks, springs, cups, etc.,I am already a little bit ahead of the game from the get go. Too much of a newb with it just yet to give you accurate pro's & con's. Ask me after Cup..... |
06-29-2009, 07:53 PM | #6 |
WOOPOOW!! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,218
| |
06-29-2009, 07:57 PM | #7 |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
|
The only one I've seen run is JP's Havok and it looked pretty good. I've heard a lot of good things about KK's STand T , but I'm a spring kind of guy . Boing
|
06-29-2009, 08:18 PM | #8 |
TEAM MODERATOR Join Date: May 2004 Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10,855
| I'll see your boing and raise you 4 shock shafts. I'm not trying to dog on the torsions,some guys swear by them. They do work well in some cases. Some torsions have better tune-ability than others. IMO,the added lightweightness you get from a torsion chassis is a moot point. Typically,guys that run a torsion run more weight in the wheels/on the axle to make the torsion do it's thing. There goes the "lighter rig" theory Less stuff to fool with,I can see that. Not having to worry about leaky shocks is a plus I guess. I've seen some torsions that are very unpredictable and will flop around like a fish uncontrollably. I'm not saying one or any of them is better or worse than the other in that regard. Just something I noticed watching several torsion rigs run. I'll stick with my butter smooth shocks,leaks or not. |
06-29-2009, 08:30 PM | #9 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: EAST TN WHERE SHINE IS FREE
Posts: 242
|
keep the info coming guys I dont want to start a pissing match Im just looking for some good tech on this topic
|
06-29-2009, 08:46 PM | #10 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: May 2009 Location: just north of BFE in SC
Posts: 979
|
I am running the JP HAVOC and it was nice but there was too many times when climbing a steep incline and the climb flexed left and right. Therefore the torsion in the front wouldn't flex b/c all the weight was on the rear. So I just shaved a little off the chassis and added 3.5 springs now its perfect for ME. (thats the key word though. . . me) and another guy from the comp was running KK ST and which is the opposite of mine and he had the same problem and added springs. So all in all prob depends on your local comp courses as to what works for you. It would be nice if you could just watch one at your local comp and see how it does GOOD LUCK
|
06-29-2009, 08:55 PM | #11 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: EAST TN WHERE SHINE IS FREE
Posts: 242
|
i kind look at like leaf springs vs coil overs in 1/1 its just kinda what works with what you got. I would imagine that a torsion rig would side hill better but not climb as good is that right ?
|
06-30-2009, 05:09 PM | #12 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: May 2009 Location: just north of BFE in SC
Posts: 979
|
I think you're on the right track. I have always thought the same thing about torsion vs spring. On the other hand you never see any of the top drivers with torsion. Not saying there isn't. . . so let us know what you decide to get. If you go torsion you can always convert it to spring. |
06-30-2009, 07:35 PM | #13 |
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
|
I am surprised no mentioned this but I would look into the DNA Mantis for the berg. You get the best of both worlds. Sprung or droop in the front with torsion in the rear. You also get an amazing amount of belly clearance that no other chassis listed can offer. Here's a link to the mantis: http://stores.homestead.com/hstrial-AStrinko1/-strse-Chassis-cln-2.2-comp-cln-MOA-(Berg%2C-Bully%2C-Hot-Racing%2C-etc.)/Categories.bok |
06-30-2009, 08:20 PM | #14 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: south caki laki again
Posts: 1,695
|
kk st hands down favorite for me, I have had about everything under the sun for a berg, the geometry for the st is a little hard to get figured out. A lot of people are using straight rods and they should look at the geometry lessons they learned in school and what they are trying to achieve, once you get it set up its really hard to beat. Now keep in mind I cant drive a thirsty horse to water!!
|
06-30-2009, 09:27 PM | #15 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: May 2009 Location: just north of BFE in SC
Posts: 979
| Quote:
| |
07-01-2009, 11:54 AM | #16 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: T1E Country
Posts: 692
|
Wow, with all the comedian's round here I'd have figured to have heard................. " Torsion is nice But I'd rather Be Sprung " |
07-01-2009, 03:29 PM | #17 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: kerrville
Posts: 265
|
main difference between sprung vs. tortion is how you have to drive it to apply the traction. that being said, tortion is much more stable on flat angled surfaces. (kinda like a drooper but without the unloading). in areas where their is alot of opposing surfaces (high articulation and only one end twisting or each end twisting opposite) a sprung rig will work much better. IF your curious about it get a Zero "T" ....remember everything that KK makes is interchangable so you can always get just a set of 3.5 side plates to go back sprung. WHat i have set up with my "T" is 4 inch losi crawler shocks set up for droop, fully collapsed they are the correct link length and you can just put a ziptie or string to lock them down for full tortion action. then when you have a course where the ability to flex a bit more is desired you can just undo them.....plus they will drop out to the point that you have the same breakover ability as running 4 1/2 inches of belly clearance. |
07-02-2009, 08:44 PM | #18 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: EAST TN WHERE SHINE IS FREE
Posts: 242
|
well after a few weeks of studying i went with a cdw lt2 chassis i dont think torsion is for me :-( maby after a more people run it and i feel like its more proven |
| |