| |
10-06-2010, 11:32 AM
| #1 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: nantucket
Posts: 58
|  rule 2.1.6 confusion
This is a question to officials in the rules department. PLEASE DO NOT POST YOUR OPINIONS Im looking for actual facts pertaining to the rules So i read this huge tread from the beginning of the year about a force articulation argument. Where it seamed like a lot of questions got answered. But im still not sure about cantilevered suspensions. Is it legal in 2.2 to have 1. a cantilevered suspension with a fixed end point....ex axle-link-cantilever-shock-chassis 2.a cantilevered suspension with a fixed end point....ex axle-shock-cantilever-link-chassis 3. a cantilevered suspension with a hydraulic or electric end point...ex axle-link-cantilever-shock-hydraulic ram-chassis 4. a cantilevered suspension with a hydraulic or electric end point...ex axle-shock-cantilever-link-hydraulic ram-chassis I guess my real question is has any one defined "FIXED" yet and are cantilevers part of this. Thank you for your time |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
10-06-2010, 11:36 AM
| #2 |
| On the lookout for Rocks   Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 3,711
|
We do have a Rules section that you can post in.....http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/wrcca-rules/ |
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 11:39 AM
| #3 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
Or, you could contact your local Rules Committee Representative....since you dont want any "opinions".... http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showgroups.php Last edited by JeremyH; 10-06-2010 at 11:42 AM. |
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 11:47 AM
| #4 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: nantucket
Posts: 58
|
cool thanks for pointing me to the correct forum.... constant If i had a local representative i would but i live 30 miles out at sea and as far as i know there isnt one anywhere around here....jermy I have reposted on the correct forum no need to move thread.....moderator |
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 11:49 AM
| #5 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
Any of them should be able to answer your question...........especially Fishmaxx.
|
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 12:00 PM
| #6 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: nantucket
Posts: 58
|
fishmaxx just shot me a reply on the rules forum...... answer will come out with 2011 rule changes.... thanks for the help curios to find out what the rule committee says the debate i read from earlier this year was fairly heated and long(11 pgs worth) |
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 12:01 PM
| #7 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
Yep, I remember. My super used to run a chassis that had a cantilever suspension.
|
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 12:03 PM
| #8 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: nantucket
Posts: 58
|
were you the tuber with a servo connected to the rear shocks???
|
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 12:09 PM
| #9 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
Nope....just a regular old cantilever suspension:  I have a feeling that the type of suspension I pictured above will be allowed, but the kind that you talk about will not.... |
|
| |
|
10-06-2010, 12:19 PM
| #10 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: nantucket
Posts: 58
|
looks sweet.... I think your right about what will be allowed(from my reading) at this point one would have to wonder what would be an expectable for "fixed" and why the active and forced suspension rules are even there in the rule book in first place... Yes i know this is now getting into opinion.... |
|
| |
 |
| |
Linear Mode
