09-04-2006, 01:21 PM | #1 |
I'm a stupid C U N T! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In the Garage!
Posts: 4,307
| dual rate springs??
So i have been tossin around the idea of running dual rate springs, I was wondering If anyone had any suggestions on propper setup. Should the stiffer spring be on top or bottom, whats the advatange/disadvantage of doing this. Also how would you go about choosing what spring rate to go with
|
Sponsored Links | |
09-04-2006, 01:25 PM | #2 |
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
|
The coil on the top is your "ride" spring. The lower coil is meant mainly for when the top coil is out of compression and to keep the shock from bottoming out. So..usually the soft "tender" spring is on the top.
|
09-04-2006, 01:42 PM | #3 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,721
|
Dual rate springs are generally intended for faster driving. When you are blazing across a bumpy surface, the soft springs take care if the little bumps and such, and then the larger springs handle any big ruts or jumps. They may help regulate your flex a little, though. The soft set will allow easy flex to a certian degree, and then the stiffer springs will allow it to continue, but provide more resistance to prevent over-articulation. Maybe? |
09-04-2006, 01:50 PM | #4 | |
I'm a stupid C U N T! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In the Garage!
Posts: 4,307
| Quote:
| |
09-04-2006, 02:34 PM | #5 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: MEDFORD
Posts: 440
|
i would go with the softer springs on top that is what i am doing with a set of tlt shocks for a scaler im building.
|
09-04-2006, 02:46 PM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Vancouver Island B.C.
Posts: 999
|
I have been running a dual rate spring on the left rear of my SW2 tlt for a couple months. Originally i did it to help fight the little torque twist i had, and i think it helped to some degree. I just didnt want to run a stiff coil for the whole range of travel, so i figured this would be a reasonable compromise. I run my shocks upside down, and the soft spring is on top. I made a slider out of 2 maxx spring seats (the stepped things) and am running about 1" of a stock max red spring on the bottom. I like the way the truck handles so im leaving it, and it was definitely an improvement compared to running the solid red spring.
|
09-04-2006, 02:46 PM | #7 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,721
| Quote:
| |
09-04-2006, 02:49 PM | #8 |
I'm a stupid C U N T! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In the Garage!
Posts: 4,307
|
what i was planning was a hellfire shock w/2 jato springs equal length
|
09-04-2006, 05:41 PM | #9 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: May 2006 Location: Anaheim
Posts: 139
|
In theory it should not matter which spring goes where, most people put the shorter spring on the top and the longer spring on the bottom. Typically the stronger spring is shorter as you don't want to limit travel to much or increase spring rate to much. Another idea is run silicon tubing on your shock shafts to limit compression travel slightly, you can tune the length of the tubing to get different 2nd or 3rd spring rate and dampening rates. |
09-05-2006, 10:50 AM | #10 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,721
| Quote:
Soaking up little bumps and imperfections in the road is what the soft springs do, and you don't really need much to do that. But for big jumps and landings, you want the longer, stiffer springs to handle the full travel of the shock. I could be wrong, though. | |
09-05-2006, 12:46 PM | #11 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: May 2006 Location: Anaheim
Posts: 139
|
The Maxx springs I had were hard on top short, and soft on the bottom long. It also depends on what spring rates and travel you are looking for. |
09-05-2006, 04:17 PM | #12 | |
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
| Quote:
I have the Pro-Lines on my build, and I bought the soft rate coil kit also..and they seem to be very nice. The closest to what a real coil-over would react like I think. | |
| |