Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > General Crawlers
Loading

Notices

Thread: 60/40 or 50/50

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-08-2007, 02:15 AM   #1
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Clovis
Posts: 158
Default 60/40 or 50/50

Well what does everyone prefer a 60/40 setup or a50/50?

Also does anyone know where to buy a small sheet of delrin thats about 1/4in thick online?
pbfrk4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-08-2007, 02:32 AM   #2
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfrk4life
Well what does everyone prefer a 60/40 setup or a50/50?

Also does anyone know where to buy a small sheet of delrin thats about 1/4in thick online?
i prefer a 60/40 set up.
head to the supermarket and go down the kitchen section and check out the chopping boards. should be something in that thickness for only a few bucks.
davway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 02:40 AM   #3
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Clovis
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davway
i prefer a 60/40 set up.
head to the supermarket and go down the kitchen section and check out the chopping boards. should be something in that thickness for only a few bucks.
thats a really good idea, thanks!
pbfrk4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 02:35 PM   #4
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfrk4life
Well what does everyone prefer a 60/40 setup or a50/50?

Also does anyone know where to buy a small sheet of delrin thats about 1/4in thick online?
Try mcmaster.com, that place rocks...
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 02:42 PM   #5
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

How would you figure out the length of the links, or what ratio of length would you use for 60/40.....? thanks
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 02:48 PM   #6
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 3,377
Default

well, go 50/50, then add 10% to half and take 10% from half. thats why i orefer 50/50, easier to figure, plus if somthing breaks its the same piece front or back.
Thorsteenster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 07:52 PM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thorsteenster
well, go 50/50, then add 10% to half and take 10% from half. thats why i orefer 50/50, easier to figure, plus if somthing breaks its the same piece front or back.
Thanks, I was kinda wondering about how I would reduce the length for the 40% part.

CLARIFY....60/40 means 60% longer links up front and the chasis is forward more than center right?

thanks.
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 08:41 PM   #8
I wanna be Dave
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Martinsburg WV
Posts: 2,781
Default

60/40 would be longer REAR links - yes, so the chassis is more forward than centered on the wheelbase.
Last time I made up some links I made the rears 1/2" longer than the fronts. It's probably closer to 55/45 than 60/40, and looking at it you can barely tell.
I think it performed better than 50/50, though - I left it that way.
5150, have you seen the yardstick mock-up method? Get 2 wooden yardsticks from the fabric store, drill holes through them at the length of wheelbase you want, then stand them on edge side-by-side and bolt them to your axles with the wheel nuts. Then you can sit your chassis in the center, blocked up to the height you want, and get some accurate link measurements.

Last edited by Big Mike; 03-16-2007 at 08:46 PM.
Big Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 12:45 PM   #9
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

Big Mike,

yea i did just the other day. That is an incredible amount of help. That is what i have been asking for, for months. So the yars sticks are vertical and the numbers are facing outwards and drill hole say at 12.5 on the yard stick and stick stub shaft throught the hole and bolt on...

Is that pretty much it?

Thanks a lot for the help!
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 01:00 PM   #10
I wanna be Dave
 
FrankyRizzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 7,172
Default

60/40 link setup with the tranny centered between the axles front to rear. Great climbing but still somewhat balanced up top.
FrankyRizzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 11:54 PM   #11
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankyRizzo
60/40 link setup with the tranny centered between the axles front to rear. Great climbing but still somewhat balanced up top.
Can you please explain more about this. I dont quite understand?

I do know that 60/40 means 60% weight in REAR and longer link in REAR.......Right?

"Can anybody add to this................?"
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 12:09 AM   #12
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5150bronco
Thanks, I was kinda wondering about how I would reduce the length for the 40% part.

CLARIFY....60/40 means 60% longer links up front and the chasis is forward more than center right?

thanks.
I got it....60% of weight up front with shorter links......Thanks!
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 11:40 AM   #13
I wanna be Dave
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Martinsburg WV
Posts: 2,781
Default

Quote:
So the yard sticks are vertical and the numbers are facing outwards and drill hole say at 12.5 on the yard stick and stick stub shaft throught the hole and bolt on...
Exactly. Then your axles stay in the position you want w/o having to be careful to not knock them around trying to take measurements.
Quote:
I do know that 60/40 means 60% weight in REAR and longer link in REAR.......Right?
It's got nothing to do with weight placement (well it does indirectly)
It's a ratio of the length of front links vs. rear links. 60% of the total length in front, 40% in rear = 60/40 chassis.
Big Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 12:06 PM   #14
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

Thanks Big Mike......!

5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 08:22 PM   #15
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sw pa
Posts: 29
Smile

Thanks Fot The Info That Really Helps Clear Things Up For Me To..
joen007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 02:09 AM   #16
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,697
Default

I thought I would share a tid bit on info.....

I have the J2-TT from reign and I just made all new links and created a 60/40 setup for the chassis.......

If anyone has questions just ask, supposedly it is a first for the most part...

5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 05:33 PM   #17
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sw pa
Posts: 29
Default

i like the 60/40 thats what i might use on my super
joen007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 06:16 PM   #18
Oppan Gangnam Style
 
chino63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Shingle Springs
Posts: 5,164
Default

I prefer to run my comp rig at 50/50. I have tried 60/40 in the past and noticed little difference. From a performance standpoint, I personally don't see any benefit either way. As long as you set up and dial in your rig for that particular configuration you're good to go. I like 50/50 because I only have to carry one length of spare links.
chino63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com