Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > General Crawlers
Loading

Notices

Thread: cantilever suspension

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2007, 04:21 PM   #1
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: nor-cal
Posts: 1,048
Default cantilever suspension

what is the pros and cons to this style of suspension set-up??
Wicked_Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-08-2007, 04:25 PM   #2
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

Easy to design a rising rate suspension.

More parts (complexity) that are mounted up high, raising the Center of Gravity. Though it depends on the design I suppose.
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 04:30 PM   #3
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: nor-cal
Posts: 1,048
Default

but, does it work better or worse, then a regular sprung set-up
Wicked_Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 04:30 PM   #4
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VARCOR
Posts: 1,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_crawler View Post
but, does it work better or worse, then a regular sprung set-up
How many comp rigs do you see here running canti setups??
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 04:33 PM   #5
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: nor-cal
Posts: 1,048
Default

not many, its going on a semi scale/ mess around rig, im building a bender sw3 for comps
Wicked_Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 08:13 PM   #6
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NEWPORT NEWS
Posts: 48
Default

Don't a few 1:1 desert racers use cantilever suspensions for long travel? Might be fun to build a rock racer using a cantilever setup..
BESRK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 10:38 PM   #7
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mesa
Posts: 602
Default

Personally I think it makes the basic crawler more complex than it needs to be but in the same breath, I've thought about trying it. I would steer away from it on a comp rig ( which you already said it's NOT for ) just to keep it simple. Less parts, less chance for stuff to break.

You could run a shorter shock and get the same travel. There wouldn't be any real weight savings. The added parts would make up for the smaller and somewhat lighter shock. It would give you more tuning options for shocks.

If engineered right, I would think you could get the shock lower but I doubt it would lower the CG much because of the extra parts. But you can relocate the shock and keep a body mounted lower. Like running a deep bed on a truck and keeping it more scale.
Mriswith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 10:51 PM   #8
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb View Post
How many comp rigs do you see here running canti setups??
Heavy and Rxcrawler are running Heavy's Area 51 Chassis, it uses a cantilever suspension, they are pretty high in the SERCRC rankings.
Kamikaze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 01:52 AM   #9
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ...Here & There
Posts: 1,590
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamikaze View Post
Heavy and Rxcrawler are running Heavy's Area 51 Chassis, it uses a cantilever suspension, they are pretty high in the SERCRC rankings.
As far as I know;
Heavy runs alot stiffer springs on his, than Rxcrawler does...

Here's a vid of the O.G. AREA 51 from "Rock City", a comp local in Alabama:
** F bomb ALERT at :04:01 **
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...76844277470828

Last edited by raytard; 06-09-2007 at 02:02 AM.
raytard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com