Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Heritage Crawlers > HPI Wheely King
Loading

Notices

Thread: My WK Trail truck

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2007, 06:52 AM   #1
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default My WK Trail truck

I picked up a wheely king weeks ago. Put a 2S lipo in it and have been beating it up. Decided I wanted to stretch the wheelbase to stop the wheely action and turn it into a capable trail truck that would be decent on rocks, good in mud, good climber etc...

Made my own lower links and mounted a tamiya upper stack bracket on the top of the WK axle for the upper links. I was going to wait on making upper links until I got the lower links put together but I found out that the 112mm revo rods worked just about perfectly. I also mounted the bottom of the shock to the screw that holds the C-hub in. I'm going to still make my own upper links.





I cut about 1/4" off of stock maxx drive shafts. I'm not sure what happened here but I ended up buying half shafts with yokes and the yokes had a 5mm shaft diameter? I thought maxxes all used 6mm? Maybe they were for a different vehicle.... so I had to buy new yokes.



I'm going to run swamp dawgs and some type of beadlock wheels (if axials ever come out) but here it is with the WK wheels.



The mandatory flex shot.



I'll be running a rubicon body but I got this suburban body from sloppy so I set it on there. It looks decent to me. I might try some savage shocks to get the chassis up in the air some more. I think about 3/4" higher would be nice and the stock shocks are just way to short for that. That center section is going to drag like a mother since it doesn't have a skid plate. It's a trail truck after all so I'm not to worried about center of gravity. It would look a lot better with some more of that chassis hidden too.



NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-05-2007, 06:56 AM   #2
I wanna be Dave
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Martinsburg WV
Posts: 2,781
Default

Did you hack up some Easton arrow shafts for your lower links? Those should be strong alright. Looking good so far...
Big Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:01 AM   #3
06 Super National Champ
 
JasonInAugusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stark Industries Bar and Grill
Posts: 11,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickRummy
I cut about 1/4" off of stock maxx drive shafts. I'm not sure what happened here but I ended up buying half shafts with yokes and the yokes had a 5mm shaft diameter? I thought maxxes all used 6mm? Maybe they were for a different vehicle.... so I had to buy new yokes.

T-Maxx transmissions use 5mm yokes. (TRA4927)
E-Maxx transmissions and the Maxx diff inputs/outputs use 6mm yokes. (TRA4928 )
JasonInAugusta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:11 AM   #4
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mike
Did you hack up some Easton arrow shafts for your lower links? Those should be strong alright. Looking good so far...
Yup, here is the thread on them.

Rod end sizes and part numbers

JIA, that explains the mishap!
NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:27 AM   #5
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 154
Default

I posted in JIA's thread about this, but I'll put it here too... The WK shafts and Maxx shafts are exactly the same, you can mix and match parts from each. So, put your WK ends on the maxx shafts for example.
swhenrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:09 AM   #6
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rats nest Grafton ND
Posts: 381
Default

I was looking at your pinion angles a bit and they seem to be a bit on the severe side. Not sure but you might want to shorten up the upper links or lengthen the lower links to get the pinion angles more inline.
Rat1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:17 AM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

I agree with you %100 however, if I change the upper links to help with pinion angle my caster is going to get rediculous. Remember that the WK axles are setup to point the pinion up at the bottom of the tranny. I ran it aorund and I have no drive shaft binding. Clocking the C-hubs on the axle would be nice but I don't want to grind off the tabs on the axle housings to do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat1
I was looking at your pinion angles a bit and they seem to be a bit on the severe side. Not sure but you might want to shorten up the upper links or lengthen the lower links to get the pinion angles more inline.
NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:26 AM   #8
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rats nest Grafton ND
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickRummy
I agree with you %100 however, if I change the upper links to help with pinion angle my caster is going to get rediculous. Remember that the WK axles are setup to point the pinion up at the bottom of the tranny. I ran it aorund and I have no drive shaft binding. Clocking the C-hubs on the axle would be nice but I don't want to grind off the tabs on the axle housings to do that.
I do not have a WK yet and did not know about the caster. Oh well it was a shot anyway.

Maybe someone in the aftermarket will offer up some new Cs to make the caster problem better when clocking the axle?
Rat1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:48 AM   #9
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

It would be relatively easy to do. I'm wanting to get a set of C-hubs to try and dremel out the slots to clock them how I want. It's ok for now but would be nice to have that option.
NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 10:02 AM   #10
I wanna be Dave
 
dezfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Happiness is a warm AK.
Posts: 12,563
Default

The axles are fine. We have been trying to get clocked TLT axles for ages.

When you have away from the stock chassis, I think you will be pleased w/ the OEM setup!
dezfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 10:45 AM   #11
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

I agree Dez. The stock chassis has the outputs REALLY low. I plan on raising the truck about an inch when I get the new shocks which will make the drivelines about perfect. In a custom chassis I'm sure the OEM pinion angle would be nice.
NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 08:32 PM   #12
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: akron
Posts: 4,054
Default

nice need to get some camo on that burb body to match those links
sloppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 06:19 AM   #13
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

I have a set of savage shocks and swamp dawgs coming in next week hopefully. That will help get that belly up a bit and get me some tires that are actually worth something. Tow motor tires flex better than these things.

I'm also cutting up the arrow shafts to make the upper links today. I'll give you those pushrods back. I was going to go buy the inserts after work but we got 2-3 inches so we'll see how the roads afterwards.
NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 06:37 AM   #14
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

Cut down some aluminum to make some temporary extended body posts. As soon as the shocks get in I'll readjust the body so it doesn't have that goofy body lift look to it.



Then took it out for a little bashing around. It was to cold to stay out for more than 10 minutes.







Here is a short video.



Looks like I'll have to epoxy or glue those inserts into the arrows. They were a REALLY right fit but I still managed to pull one out. I just popped it back in and didn't have any more problems. I'll glue them in to play it safe.

NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:19 AM   #15
Quarry Creeper
 
Slow_Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dirty Jerzee
Posts: 356
Default

nick,
how long did you make the lower links?
Slow_Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:32 AM   #16
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 1,784
Default

Here is what I made mine to.

NickRummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 07:41 AM   #17
Quarry Creeper
 
Slow_Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dirty Jerzee
Posts: 356
Default

sweet. thanks
Slow_Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 12:33 PM   #18
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: akron
Posts: 4,054
Default

all right i need to get the pede back out and we can beat the snot out of these things you better get some ballons so we can try to drown them.
did you get those tires mounted?
sloppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 08:51 PM   #19
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: nc
Posts: 867
Default

is that the top speed stock.
cammok5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 01:05 AM   #20
Rock Crawler
 
JIA's Dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Midway
Posts: 836
Default

Nick, Glad to see the XX75 cutoffs going to good use. Since you are using the inserts which have 8-32 threads you could use 8-32 all-thread and go all the way thru the cutoffs with out the inserts and never have to worry about the inserts pulling out or the arrow bending factor. The right ball ends fit inside or flush up with some arrows.
JIA's Dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com