| |
05-19-2009, 06:48 PM
| #1 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Canon City
Posts: 182
|  SICK Custom Beadlocks!
Just got a set from motoworx and love these things 2mm offset more then the stock MRC offset so you gain more then what you would the 1mm hexes So that saved me $20. Myself and motoworx racing are working together to sell them on the site if you guys are interested they do a great job! http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showt...93#post1802893 Stock Wheels rings hardware = 0.95 oz Cross wheels with rings and hardware 5.95 oz       Last edited by JFAB; 05-20-2009 at 11:17 AM. |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
05-19-2009, 07:27 PM
| #2 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: CO
Posts: 549
|  Those things are plain sexy!
|
|
| |
|
05-19-2009, 07:30 PM
| #3 |
| Hateraide   Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Mission BC
Posts: 1,538
|
those do look pretty sweet no need to weight those for the little guys eh  |
|
| |
|
05-20-2009, 12:04 AM
| #4 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 214
|
what is the weight on these and aren't you worried the rear might weigh to much? i love the looks of them regardless!!
|
|
| |
|
05-20-2009, 06:48 AM
| #5 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Cottontown
Posts: 880
|
I think they're BITCHEN! As for the weight being too much. Because the front and rear wheel still weigh the same amount as each other it shouldn't be a problem. Adding weight to them is still gonna be the ticket to getting a good setup. If the stock wheel weigh 6oz a piece and you add 3 oz. to the front and 1.5oz in the rear your gonna get 9oz in front and 7.5 in the rear. If his new custom wheels weigh 10oz a piece then adding the same 3oz front and 1.5oz rear will get him 13oz and 11.5oz. So, you end up with the same ballance. |
|
| |
|
05-20-2009, 11:17 AM
| #6 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Canon City
Posts: 182
|
Just put them on the scale: Stock Wheels rings hardware = 0.95 oz Cross wheels with rings and hardware 5.95 oz |
|
| |
|
05-20-2009, 01:53 PM
| #7 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 382
|
that design looks tight...
|
|
| |
|
05-20-2009, 02:06 PM
| #8 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: searching
Posts: 384
|
mr some nice mrc rims  |
|
| |
|
05-21-2009, 10:58 AM
| #9 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,496
| Quote:
They look cool, but they can upset the balance by being too heavy. | |
|
| |
|
05-22-2009, 12:24 AM
| #10 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Gunpowder, MD
Posts: 131
|
Looks Great!! |
|
| |
|
05-22-2009, 10:02 PM
| #11 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: barstow
Posts: 1,303
|
those are great looking rims personally not a fan of the iron cross but i would buy these wheels
|
|
| |
|
05-22-2009, 10:34 PM
| #12 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Canon City
Posts: 182
|
If you go to the link you can see the ufo design also.
|
|
| |
|
05-22-2009, 11:09 PM
| #13 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: barstow
Posts: 1,303
|
seen the ufo's the iron cross is way better
|
|
| |
|
05-23-2009, 09:29 PM
| #14 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Clemente, CA.
Posts: 531
|
To heavy for my preference, would go great with some narrowed tlts , they do look good
|
|
| |
 |
| |
Linear Mode
