|
View Poll Results: Superclass: droop or sprung shock set up? | |||
Droop | 3 | 42.86% | |
Sprung | 4 | 57.14% | |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-08-2008, 01:41 AM | #1 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Canyon Country
Posts: 95
| Droop or sprung? which way to go?
I am in the process of building a tube chassis for a clod based crawler and I am confused about a droop set up...so far I have the axles locked clods, rooster crawler, dual novak 55 turn, Hs-5995TG front, Hs5645MG rear servos, modded TQ3, narrowed axial 8 hole wheels with moab xl's, derlin links, I want a 17" wheel base with 3" GC. now rethinking the sprung shock set up that I was going to do what advantages and disadvantages compared to a sprung set up does it have? what is the reasoning for a internal spring? any other comments are welcome! be nice!! noob here! not sure which set up I will like more... this is my first crawler, I have been into r/c for years but this is all very different than what I have been used too...1/8 truggy 1/10 electric thanks! |
Sponsored Links | |
04-08-2008, 12:46 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Canada, eh.
Posts: 2,919
|
Really depends on your local conditions. For myself, I've found that full droop doesn't work great and am now experimenting with sprung rear/drooped front. Really something you need to play around with. Biggest advantage of droop is maintaining a low cog. Internal spring helps keep the shock compressed and avoids having the wheel just free fall when it goes off a ledge (i.e., a slower drop rate). Search for droop and you'll find load and loads of discussion on it, but again, what works for one person won't necessarily work for yourself. |
| |