| |
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-16-2006, 08:50 AM
| #1 |
| Quarry Creeper  Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 463
|  Another "Scale-ish" Makeover For My 2.2 Clod... Basically I had a wide stance before with M2k's and a C-10 body that I though looked a little scale. It looked like this-  I switched to Pede rears (narrower), 2.2 Red Rocks, Maxx shocks, along with a Rubi body. I think it looks 100% better and more "scale-ish" than before...      Whatcha think.... Last edited by RANOVRU; 05-16-2006 at 09:07 AM. |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
05-16-2006, 08:56 AM
| #2 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Asia
Posts: 279
| i dont see anything wrong with any of them ... frankly, im partial to the C10 and F100. |
|
| |
|
05-16-2006, 11:26 AM
| #3 |
| Rock Crawler  Join Date: May 2004 Location: Calgary
Posts: 843
| Nice! Those Imex tires look great with the Rubi body. Good Job RANOVRU. |
|
| |
|
05-16-2006, 12:10 PM
| #4 |
| Quarry Creeper  Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ft. collins
Posts: 414
| Looks great! I'm thinking of building a 2.2 clod for a new FJ40 body I have laying around. I run full size red rocks on my super and they work great. Nice build. What chasis is that? |
|
| |
|
05-16-2006, 12:34 PM
| #5 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: England
Posts: 68
| Yup, rear pedes are the only rims for 2.2 scale clods, all the others look too wide. I have the exact same wheel body combo almost finshed. |
|
| |
|
05-16-2006, 12:35 PM
| #6 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,081
| Looks nice, great job. |
|
| |
|
05-16-2006, 01:51 PM
| #7 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 463
| Thanks fella's. The chasis is a cut down TXT. Yea I really like how the Pede rears narrow the width. The tires are actually under chasis some now. |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
