Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Superclass Crawlers > Tamiya Clod Buster
Loading

Notices

Thread: Digger 2

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2005, 06:33 AM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the shop terrorising the cat with the heli.
Posts: 386
Talking Digger 2

When I went to SFR 3 yesterday I asked rx if he had retired digger and he said that he had so now the next step is to build Digger 2. I am thinking of borrowing a single tube design and making a few changes to it. On digger the problems were the width due to the gear reductions, it was as wide as it was long, and I kept breaking cases and axle tubes and cases. So lets lets look at the problems with the original and lay Digger 2 out a step at the time.

problem 1 Learn to drive the damn thing. I think this will be on going.

problem 2 Width Digger 2 will have lathe motors and 9t pinions no reductions

problem 3 Tranny carnage. New cases will have JPS sluminum axle tubes and turn knuckles. Also aluminum gears. The aluminum cases will come after I recover from the injuries I suffer when the wife finds out i'm spending a few bucks on a new crawler.

Problem 4 Bulky 1/4 scale servos. These were awsome but sometimes got hung uup on steep climbs. These will be replaced with JR 8611 digital servos. These are rated at 220 oz torque at 4.8 volts. On 6 volts these will have the same torque of the 1/4 scale and I wont have to run a seperate battery pack to power them and they have great holding power.

I will still use the piggy back shocks. I liked the original ones, nice and smooth. On the batteries I want to try a diffrent route this time. Instead of a standard 6 cell battery I want to use a 4 cell 4400 mill ion battery. This is 4 oz lighter than a standard 6 cell pack and I have seen them run 10 of the 8611 servos for over 2 hours straight without having to be recharged. The drawbacks are the price which is $54 each, and having to run a voltage reducer. The ion packs put out 11.1 volts and the recharge time which is over 2 hours. All in all this will cut roughly 10 oz off the overall weight. Any extra weight will be added to the tires.
There will be three sets of tires this time instead of one. Still looking around at what everyone is usuing now.
And of course the truck will have a low profile with better ground clearance.
aubie is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-13-2005, 09:12 AM   #2
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: south central
Posts: 47
Default

Sounds like a good plan. And I think problem #1 is universal for most people
superdenk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 09:12 AM   #3
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,399
Default

Sounds sweet aubie! About the comment of your wife kickin your butt though!

Lathe motors do VERY well on more voltage, I would say give em the full 11.1V, they are rated to 12V
SR5Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 10:14 AM   #4
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the shop terrorising the cat with the heli.
Posts: 386
Default

Will the super rooster and the reciever handle it though.

Just got the word today. Once the new workshop is finished I have a new small lathe, milling machine and mig welder coming. I see some nice custom parts and tube frames in the near future.

Last edited by aubie; 03-13-2005 at 10:30 AM.
aubie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 10:42 AM   #5
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,399
Default

SR can do 12V I think? And the BEC will manage the extra voltage.
SR5Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 11:28 AM   #6
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

Yeap, SR is rated as 6-10 cells.

Link to Specs
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 11:29 AM   #7
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EeePee
Yeap, SR is rated as 6-10 cells.

Link to Specs
Yeah, I'm not even sure why I said think
SR5Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 11:37 AM   #8
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

"I think" is the universal, cover your ass incase you're wrong, terminology.

At least I think it is.
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 12:27 PM   #9
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EeePee
"I think" is the universal, cover your ass incase you're wrong, terminology.

At least I think it is.
SR5Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 01:33 PM   #10
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the shop terrorising the cat with the heli.
Posts: 386
Default

Rofl. I have missed this place.
aubie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 01:39 PM   #11
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Auburn University
Posts: 75
Default

i dont think the aluminum axle tubes are needed. There are plenty of people running plastic stock tube and not having a problem. I think the money could be better spent somewhere on the rig.
4x4XJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 02:08 PM   #12
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the shop terrorising the cat with the heli.
Posts: 386
Default

4x4 I am changing the axle tubes due to past experience. I have a tendancy to overstress parts due to not backing off the throttle so were going with the aluminum tubes.
aubie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com