|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-02-2006, 09:17 PM | #1 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Alfred
Posts: 18
| How to build a function follows form crawler?
I have been surfing here looking for ideas to build a crawler. This is what i have come up with. I NEED to run a HPI bronco body. i have loved them for years and my dad ownes one, wouldnt appreciate me wheeling it though. This has to look scale (except the track width), using 2.2 tires and wheels. I really like CSR's "rockmonkey" as seen here. "RockMonkey" gets a makeover There was also a scale 2.2 clod i found, but alas the thread has lost itself. Until this point i realized i havent asked a question yet. To build the most capable 2.2 crawler what base would i use (TLT,TXT, Clod) or others? Which would be easyest?, Least expencive? If anyone owns or has built one please feel free to post a pic or two and a spec/part list. Thanks all This forum is a wealth of knowledge that the rest of the rc community is missing out on. Last edited by outfitter540; 04-03-2006 at 07:31 AM. |
Sponsored Links | |
04-02-2006, 09:36 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,009
|
The body's by HPI, not Pro-line. If you want it to look scale, use TLT axles. Then use a Pede or Stealth tranny, etc etc etc, all the good stuff can be found in the 2.2 forum, but if you stick with it and spend way too much money, after a year or so, your fourth crawler can look like this:
|
04-02-2006, 09:46 PM | #3 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Alfred
Posts: 18
|
Good call on the body - brain fart lol. I know a lot of people use the TLT axles, there is one part i dont like about the scale, The width. I would need to run wideners and they dont seem like good practice. i dont know as to their durability.
|
04-03-2006, 07:09 AM | #4 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 181
| Quote:
| |
04-03-2006, 07:29 AM | #5 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Alfred
Posts: 18
|
You are right on the scale part, i totaly agree. the problem is that i also want it to crawl well. i would like to keep a somewhat scale wb (11.5-12.5), but not track width. for the look i am going for it will hopefully be a suzuki samuri with full size axels underneath. lol. I was thinking that txt axles would eliminate the wideners, or even clod axles. I think that a custom chassis would be the way to go. The problem is that i am a mechanical engineering student with too many ideas and to little money, lol. I have a vast wealth of tools avalable to me to use. (rapid prototyper, mills, lathes) I just have to get my plans down.
|
04-03-2006, 09:07 AM | #6 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Thats a Good question
Posts: 552
| Quote:
| |
04-03-2006, 10:42 AM | #7 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nebiru, OuterSpace
Posts: 500
| ... Quote:
I like the look of that body--- i'm going to try it on my PTI 2.2 rig for a scale look. and i think it looks just right with the wheels where you have them in comparison to body width--- BUT-- how do you crawl with that thing and keep the wheels from catching up in the body? there's no room for articulation from what i can see? | |
04-03-2006, 11:34 AM | #8 |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
|
Clod or TXT axles will be way stronger than TLT axles so if you are looking for reliability then I would suggest them. Since you said you are looking for the "sami' w/ full width axles" look I would again recommend clod or TXT axles. Here is my old 2.2 Clod crawler: Scale 2.2 Clod crawler Here is a look at the width of the axles with different tires/wheels: The Duke 2.2: Semi-scale Clod Crawler I would say use clod or TXT axles and just decide if you want driveshafts or not. Here is a killer rig done by kingcobra that uses twin force axles, that would be another option for good strength. I think the two tubes are different lengths and kingcobra used short tubes on both sides to build his but maybe you coud use long tubes on both sides for a wider stance. goodbye landrover, hello jeep... |
04-03-2006, 02:27 PM | #9 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Alfred
Posts: 18
|
those xact trucks are the ones im going for. are the chassis custom on those?
|
04-03-2006, 04:26 PM | #10 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Posts: 1,202
| TLT axles are a good choice for something that you want to crawl but still want to look scale. I started mine as a basic crawler, not really competitive, but crawlable. And I tried to keep it looking close to scale, I wanted to look good. I started with a TSC-10 chassis and now have an SW2 on order. I'm still messing with it, hence the name "Never Done". I'm in the process of making it more of a comp crawler and still want to be able to put the Bronco body on it for the "looks" factor. Here are a couple pics: (more can be seen with the "click me" in my sig.) |
04-03-2006, 04:57 PM | #11 | |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
| Quote:
Specs on the old 2.2 clod: The Rock-Clod Gallery: A place to post u'r clod in action! specs on The Duke 2.2: The Duke 2.2: Semi-scale Clod Crawler I'm pretty sure kingcobra's was custom too. You'd have to read through his thread to be sure though. Depending on how you build them any of the axles can look scale but I have seen several TLT axles break shafts and strip gears but I have NEVER boken anything on my 2.2 clod (I'm sure the TXT axles would be just as strong). The TLT axles have a little more ground clearance (less than 1/8") and are lighter but I still like the strength of the bigger axles. Plus you can run All-T's on the big axles for more clearance. The All-T's are not as sticky as the Proline tires but they are not bad for a trail rig. I really love mine. Here you can see my 2.2 comp clod with different tires, the All-T's look much better. Last edited by Grizzly4x4; 04-03-2006 at 06:41 PM. | |
04-03-2006, 05:18 PM | #12 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Texas, San Angelo
Posts: 87
|
I agree with Grizz. Here is my Clod 2.2 http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/7418/rb15ds.jpg http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/3695/rb26tr.jpg http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/3823/rb31bu.jpg http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/92/rb43uq.jpg http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/8945/rb50rt.jpg http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/458/rb60us.jpg Last edited by Texrok; 04-04-2006 at 11:16 AM. |
04-03-2006, 06:22 PM | #13 | |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
| Quote:
| |
04-03-2006, 07:18 PM | #14 |
Newbie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Cut -N- Shoot, Texas
Posts: 36
| 2.2 Clods are awesome. But I'm about to start a TLT shafty. Here's pics of my 2.2 Clod....... Naked With body |
04-03-2006, 07:34 PM | #15 |
Im Brandon Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Colfax, CA
Posts: 8,156
|
Ahh what the hell, another scale bronco |
04-03-2006, 07:54 PM | #16 |
Newbie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Cut -N- Shoot, Texas
Posts: 36
|
(Nluvwithxlr8ing) I love the TSL cut on those tires. Looks good.
|
04-03-2006, 08:00 PM | #17 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,009
| Quote:
Articulation is like horsepower. Talk about it all you want, but what it comes down to is, how much can you really use? (Think carefully before you answer. There were a lot of Camaros stuck in the snow last winter.) | |
04-04-2006, 12:15 AM | #18 | |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
| Quote:
Last edited by Grizzly4x4; 04-04-2006 at 01:07 AM. | |
04-04-2006, 07:10 AM | #19 |
Newbie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Cut -N- Shoot, Texas
Posts: 36
|
I use about 520 hp. |
04-04-2006, 09:41 AM | #20 | |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
| Quote:
| |
| |