05-08-2006, 01:15 AM | #1 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Mt Blanc; France
Posts: 168
| My slowmotion F150
hello, this is the built of my second Tlt based "scale " crawler , semi-scale if you consider the frame isn't. I used a 5poles 400 type motor with an epicycloïdal reduction of 1by100, mounted on a hotbodies rs4nitro center bulkhead and two rear shock tower from a lightning rr, some parts of the tlt kit and i made the other parts from aluminium found at the warehouse: i have lees flex with the body and it touch the tire so i mount the body higher when rolling.also i must work on the chassis twist when there is nomore traction, and change the ratio of the final gear because it's tooooo slow but with this motor i can run more than one hour with a 800mAh battery having about three times the torque of a stock tlt i'll post two clips of it in the backyard in the video section very soon.... let me know what you think about it ;) and sorry if my english isn't perfect. |
Sponsored Links | |
05-08-2006, 01:39 AM | #2 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Hardin, KY
Posts: 976
|
Sweet!!!!!!
|
05-08-2006, 08:12 AM | #3 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 464
|
I like everthing but the stance. Either raise the front up some or lower the rear some and it'll look 10x better. Nice job on being creative though! |
05-08-2006, 09:22 AM | #4 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: MUSE, PA
Posts: 1,273
|
very cool, that seems to be an interesting way to go when building 2.2 trucks, using the 1/8th scale rear shock tower approach. and good thinking about the driveline, too. what's the wheelbase on that?? if you want to compete with that, just remember it can't be any longer than 12.5"... also, i would like to offer the suggestion of ditching the servo saver, and just running a heavy duty servo horn, instead. because at the low speeds travelled by crawlers, the servo saver is not really a factor, in fact, it's a bit of a drawback. mainly because when the servo turns, it is going to turn the servo savers spring, BEFORE it turns the wheels, where as when running a heavvy duty servo horn, you get direct and instant wheel action... just a suggestion, though... Last edited by STEEL_CITY_CRAWLER; 05-08-2006 at 09:29 AM. Reason: didn't want to double post... |
05-08-2006, 10:05 AM | #5 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Winston-Salem
Posts: 200
|
Very cool! I am definitely digging the Shock Tower Chassis trend here!
|
05-08-2006, 10:06 AM | #6 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Mt Blanc; France
Posts: 168
|
Thx, the wheelbase is 32cm about 12.20" but there is no comps for crawlers here in France maybe a national meeting this summer. and for price of the parts I spend: shock towers: 2*11€ center diff mount: 50€..outch home made parts : about 10€ polycarbonate plate: 0 so about 100us$ for the chassis and links I'd liked to make a double 3links setup but there was no more room between the the center diff output and the motor in the front, maybe making a A arm ... I have seen that the servo saver is not always a good thing but I have already broken two servos on my clod so I'll do without until I have metal gear ones Last edited by SilverRidge; 05-08-2006 at 12:15 PM. |
05-08-2006, 10:32 AM | #7 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Happiness is a warm AK.
Posts: 12,563
|
A very creative and different approach! Congrats on the build! I love seeing crawlers from around the world! |
05-08-2006, 01:00 PM | #8 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Mt Blanc; France
Posts: 168
| Quote:
| |
05-08-2006, 02:25 PM | #9 |
Newbie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: in the sticks
Posts: 7
|
Great use of parts there, and very sweet ride.
|
05-09-2006, 05:33 AM | #10 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Fryeburg
Posts: 20
|
That looks great, quite creative. I like the position of the motor so that it provides some weight leverage for the front.
|
05-09-2006, 06:27 AM | #11 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,009
|
Very creative build. I like the small chassis. Do you have trouble keeping the driveshafts in? I've never been able to keep dogbones in place; if you've beaten that obstacle, I'd love to hear how. You might want to put some limiters in those shocks to tame the articulation. 90 degrees is a bit much Take it down to 60-70 and you'll find it drives a lot more stable. What's the total weight with the 400 and small battery? Last edited by microgoat; 05-09-2006 at 06:30 AM. |
05-09-2006, 10:21 AM | #12 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Mt Blanc; France
Posts: 168
|
The total weight ready to run is 1960gr. with a 1/18th 1100 battery pack but I mostly use a 800mah 9.6 pack 20gr heavier. at 7.2v it's really too slow with this reduction gear. and I agree with your proposition, put some tube on the shock is surely the most simple way to limit articulation , now the body is the limiter and ...sometime it hangs on. I' ve noticed no problem with the dogbones on this one, the shaft can fall far lower than the shocks can go down in the front and in rear the parallelogram design avoid it, but on my other tlt( stock chassis with longer links) some time it falls... I think that the point where the links are attached to the chassis must be in line with the dogbone ball , the second solution is to make two different pivot points for lower and higher links so the axle input stay parallel to the center diff output and the distance variations are minimised but it's not efficient for a 4links. Last edited by SilverRidge; 05-09-2006 at 10:23 AM. |
05-09-2006, 11:53 AM | #13 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: N. Arkansas
Posts: 143
|
Nice truck man, real nice. How pathetic is it that people from other countries speak better english than people living in the US?(not a rip on you btw) |
08-26-2007, 10:17 AM | #14 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Mt Blanc; France
Posts: 168
|
little update: the vids can be found here: http://www.dailymotion.com/users/rel.../silverridge/1 |
08-26-2007, 03:37 PM | #15 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: ****, SL,UT
Posts: 1,610
|
wow!!! man that thing is slow nice job btw |
08-26-2007, 08:58 PM | #16 | |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bangkok,Thailand
Posts: 65
| Quote:
| |
08-31-2007, 03:03 AM | #17 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Germany
Posts: 63
|
Very cool build with nitro parts. |
08-31-2007, 03:38 AM | #18 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: monongahela
Posts: 66
|
nice pics truck looks good |
08-31-2007, 06:43 AM | #19 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
|
The idea is original, probably it was funny to build it and you can enjoy driving it, but that tranny is definitely not good for competitions. People debate if Stampede tranny is better than the Stealth or the Losi ones, I believe nothing can be more compact and so low in center of gravity as the R2. During these days I was 'dreaming' an original tranny made with other trucks ' parts but I realized that it couldn't be compared with the R2, so I abandoned the project. Bye Fernando Alfonso F1 driver champion 2005 - 2006 and 2007 Last edited by setecastronomy; 08-31-2007 at 06:44 AM. Reason: mispelled name |
08-31-2007, 08:35 PM | #20 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Leaving black marks on Hwy 200
Posts: 129
|
Looks like it turned out good. Kind of different body as well.
|
| |