Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > Tires and Wheels
Loading

Notices

Thread: AirSoft VS Poly Pellets

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2006, 08:37 PM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 208
Default AirSoft VS Poly Pellets

Bought some .12 AirSoft (AS) BB's @ $15 including tax
Bought some Poly Pellets (PP) @ $6.50 incuding tax
$8.50 less for 2 lbs./32 oz. of the Poly Pellets (PP)

PP heavier by volume than AS

Work great, in fact amazing, A & B'd between 2 identical rigs and the added weight was astounding...filled tire 1/2 full on front, 1/4 on rear

Available at crafts stores such as; Micheal's, Hobby Lobby, Jo Anne's Fabrics, etc.

Cost $8.50 less than equal "volume" of AS........

NO BRAINER

Pix below shows size comparison of the PP next to the AS.....

as well as the logo and packaging that PP comes in.

Hope this is of some interest to others, Kerry
Attached Images
  
kerrywittig is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-17-2006, 09:00 PM   #2
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: One Legend.
Posts: 2,134
Default

that would be what people are using as scale ice in their scale coolers!

Should work cool, but I like airsoft because of the more volume per weight personally. I use them to take the place of foam as well as provide weight.
Unholy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 09:27 PM   #3
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,721
Default

Do you perhaps have some numbers on how much heavier the poly pellets are by volume?
Mad Scientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 11:27 PM   #4
I wanna be Dave
 
dezfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Happiness is a warm AK.
Posts: 12,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unholy
that would be what people are using as scale ice in their scale coolers!

Should work cool, but I like airsoft because of the more volume per weight personally. I use them to take the place of foam as well as provide weight.
I agree, the weight of the PP to get the same volume as the AS would be detrimental to performance.

Cool find though!
dezfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2006, 04:21 AM   #5
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 208
Default

I guess I'm looking at this differently than some of you out there. I would think that you would want the weight to be as low as possible to the ground!! Like my signature states I am NEW to the RC world, so still lots to learn. In my 1:1 rigs I run water or lead shot (up to 150 lbs. in the front) in order to keep the weight low and planted on the ground, at the contact patch of the tire. In fact I probably should try both in a side by side comparison to truly see and feel the difference of how the vehicle performs using PP vs. AS by weight. I must say I was astounded at the difference in the abilities that the rig posessed with the PP installed, same obstacle, same lines, same vehicle, same tires.....and with the added PP the rig performed as if it was on a paved highway versus a pile of rocks. Also with the PP being in the bottom of the tires rather than filling the tires in essence raising the "center-point of the weight in the tires, the ability to traverse an off camber/side hill section was improved immensely in my opinion. I'm not trying to say that the methods and materials that many of you are using is wrong, you may be looking for a whole different cause and effect. Myself I need weight out over the front of the vehicle as well as getting weight to be down low and very shall we say "concentrated" at the very lowest point of the tire where it makes contact with the ground/rock.

I will find someone with a small scale (or will purchase one, probably a good "tool" to have when doing these builds, heck you never know when times could become rough economically and I may need to revert to selling crack in order to support my new found RC addiction, and a good accurate scale would be a nessessity to weigh the goods!.....LOL) and find out what the actual weight to volume is and post it here.

The PP would be excellent to use as ice in a scale ice chest.........this hobby and the scale detail is amazing.....I would never have thought of using the PP as ice........excellent.

Kerry
kerrywittig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2006, 02:28 PM   #6
Rock Crawler
 
S-Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Burrillville, RI
Posts: 778
Default

People use lead weight for what you are talking about... However the PP idea is good because lead can get all mucky when wet... People use the airsoft pellets to fille the majority of the tire, thereby giving the tire weight and some rigidity.. If you fill a 2.2 moab only 1/4 full of pellets the tire will flatten and fold at almost any climb if you have no foams... the point of the airsoft is to get rid of the foams and have a more consistant contact patch...


I hope that helps.
S-Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2006, 04:18 PM   #7
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 208
Default

Ok hear are the numbers................

200 milleleters AirSoft weighs 126.9 grams

200 milleliters of Poly Pellets is 123.8 grams

So figuring that my volume of each is definetly not an exact measurement ............they are equal in weight and volume.

Differences...PP costs about 57% less and are of a smaller diameter.

Here are the pix............
Attached Images
  
kerrywittig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2006, 05:03 PM   #8
I wanna be Dave
 
TLTCrawlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 2,489
Default

The problem I see is them leaking through spots, if the glue breaks in a spot!
TLTCrawlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 10:17 AM   #9
Rock Crawler
 
The Muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: san diego
Posts: 607
Default this will fix that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClodCrawlin
The problem I see is them leaking through spots, if the glue breaks in a spot!
Beadlocks
The Muscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 10:52 AM   #10
I wanna be Dave
 
dezfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Happiness is a warm AK.
Posts: 12,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerrywittig
Ok hear are the numbers................

200 milleleters AirSoft weighs 126.9 grams

200 milleliters of Poly Pellets is 123.8 grams

So figuring that my volume of each is definetly not an exact measurement ............they are equal in weight and volume.

Differences...PP costs about 57% less and are of a smaller diameter.

Here are the pix............
If that's the case, then PP is a fantastic find!
dezfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 01:21 PM   #11
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 795
Default

Im running airsoft .20 gram bb's in my tires. They are plenty heavy and ive climbed some knarly stuff(vid will be up tonight). They are at most a 1/4 tire full and flat spot after sitting for the shortest amount of time. I ran them all day on two different rigs and they performed amazing!


Check out some of the pics to get an idea at how much they conform:





As you can see thought they do give enough support:

jamesbernatchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com