• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

2013 Rules

Guys, I'm ok with not wanting to change the wheel rule to 2.8, that's fine! My problem now is how incredibly close minded and finger pointed some of you guys are! I went on here with a simple question that needed a simple and respectable response. I was immediately attacked. This is not how it should be, anyone should be able to ask something or request something in here and receive a dignified and respectable response, not a response that basicly says piss off and go away. I hope in the future people on the committee and others can have a little more respect for everyone that's a part of this forum."thumbsup"

You got to have thick skin, and be patient in this section if
you you have an idea that goes against the grain.
nobody said your bad for the hobby cuz of your idea, or
unfit to judge, or said they may not even let you compete
at their comp.

Quit your bitchin, they let you down about as gentle as they could, and
and more respectfull than I sometimes received.
 
Last edited:
Dude! I'm done. I'm off my soap box! I've gotten all I needed to hear on the topic. I don't plan on bringing any other topics in this thread anymore. Your beating a dead horse along with everyone else that posted after I said I was done. Go discuss the interesting -4 point gate idea that has been brought up. I personally think it's a great idea!"thumbsup"
 
Dude! I'm done. I'm off my soap box! I've gotten all I needed to hear on the topic. I don't plan on bringing any other topics in this thread anymore. Your beating a dead horse along with everyone else that posted after I said I was done. Go discuss the interesting -4 point gate idea that has been brought up. I personally think it's a great idea!"thumbsup"

Don't get so discouraged, it is the new ideas, and new interpretation that
Has allowed the hobby to evolve.

I don't know what happened to it, but used to you could be back
To the original rules, and read the discussions and see how it
Transformed to what we have now.

Used to a reverse was. Dq as I recall.

Lots of heated discussions on a laundry list of topics.
Sometimes it's fun to ask a stupid question just to see
who hasn't eatin dinner yet.
 
I have an Idea for the 2014 season. I would like to have the choice to use a bodiless chassis for the next 2.2s season. Please respond with a yea or nah. I don't feel like sorting through 10 pages of blah, blah, controversy, burp, fart, and I still don't care.
 
Last edited:
This came up. Rig couldn't clear gate so attempted to 2-wheel progress it. Front made it thru, rear hit the ball so we called no progress. Without entirely leaving the gate he reversed and went thru a second time this time staying inside the ball. Some wanted to give him just a reverse penalty (plus original 10), others said still no progress because the fronts cleared on one attempt and the rears on a second attempt, due to the short 6" reverse. What say U?
 
It's the same as trying to get through a gate that you can't get all 4 tires through and you only get one tire inside because your rear falls off to the side so you have to drive back around and try again to get at least two tires inside.


Gate penalty...reverse penalty...PROGRESS "thumbsup"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top