9/11 Theories

[Duuuuuuuude]

WTF? Is this a joke? I've never heard anything about this...

http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/court-indicts-bush-on-high-treason-charge/



edit: nevermind, its a joke. :lol:

 

[cbr6fs]

That's the thing.

They were already knocking on the door of Iraq and had that alibi sorted with the bullshite WMD stuff.

There was absolutely no interest what-so-ever in Afghanistan beforehand, and nothing really has come out of it since.
So to take THAT big a risk for something with no real gain just doesn't match up in my mind.


I take your point that the person refuelling may not know.
But it wouldn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out a AA plane landing, taxing, being refuelled then taking off again at a military base then seeing the WTC crash on the news.

They'd also need to get their hands on a AA lived plane.

It's just too complex, too many people involved, too many witnesses, too big a risk and all to get something they don't even care about (public support).

As for war crimes,
Trust me the ICC based at the Hague care not one single jot about the Patriot Act

Thing is though, even if it didn't go that far, the top guys would be devastated to leave a legacy and history like that.

 

[vonclod]

That's the thing.

They were already knocking on the door of Iraq and had that alibi sorted with the bullshite WMD stuff.

There was absolutely no interest what-so-ever in Afghanistan beforehand, and nothing really has come out of it since.
So to take THAT big a risk for something with no real gain just doesn't match up in my mind.


I take your point that the person refuelling may not know.
But it wouldn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out a AA plane landing, taxing, being refuelled then taking off again at a military base then seeing the WTC crash on the news.

They'd also need to get their hands on a AA lived plane.

It's just too complex, too many people involved, too many witnesses, too big a risk and all to get something they don't even care about (public support).

As for war crimes,
Trust me the ICC based at the Hague care not one single jot about the Patriot Act

Thing is though, even if it didn't go that far, the top guys would be devastated to leave a legacy and history like that.

maybee some things were gained or accomplished..consider that by 9/11 happening however it really happened alot of new agencies were created the patriot act which takes away some of your freedom was put into place and so on..govt became bigger and more controling and friends in the military industry all got rich aswell..maybee just a way to exert more control over everything domestic..maybee the "powers that be" are afraid of the people
checked out cia family jewels too..crazy sh#t but not surprising..confirmation of alot of things, and im sure the shenanigans havent stopped

 

[Duuuuuuuude]

It's just too complex, too many people involved, too many witnesses, too big a risk and all to get something they don't even care about (public support).

Ever kiss somebodies ass until you got what you wanted from them, then told them to fawk off? It would be like that.

maybee some things were gained or accomplished..consider that by 9/11 happening however it really happened alot of new agencies were created the patriot act which takes away some of your freedom was put into place and so on..govt became bigger and more controling and friends in the military industry all got rich aswell..maybee just a way to exert more control over everything domestic..maybee the "powers that be" are afraid of the people
checked out cia family jewels too..crazy sh#t but not surprising..confirmation of alot of things, and im sure the shenanigans havent stopped

Yup. Were you aware that the Patriot Act extended into British Columbia? :mrgreen:

Yeah I can't imagine that just because they came clean about what the CIA did 40 years ago that they've been perfect little angels ever since.

 

[dezfan]

edit: never mind, its a joke. :lol:

More like a Liberal wet dream.:ror:

 

[vonclod]

Yup. Were you aware that the Patriot Act extended into British Columbia? :mrgreen:

wow..i did not know that, damn..looking at some of this stuff, some i was aware of and some is news to me, our current govt is definatly more bush/republican style than any previouse:roll: but they werent in power at that time though

 

[Duuuuuuuude]

More like a Liberal wet dream.:ror:

:ror:

Gotta admit, it freaked me out when I first read it.


So throughout this whole thread, thats all you've got to say?

 

[entropy]

More like a Liberal wet dream.:ror:

Must be a small load!:shock:

 

[chip cross]

Wonder what this cost ? http://www.yahoo.com/_ylt=Ag6JhSgrr...-could-squash-9-11-201204097.html?cache=clear

 

[Duuuuuuuude]

Wounder what this cost ? http://www.yahoo.com/_ylt=Ag6JhSgrr...-could-squash-9-11-201204097.html?cache=clear

Depends on how accurate it is. Seeing as how they wisked away a good portion of the steel structure there would be a certain degree of error.

Either way, its easy to work backwards and come to the conclusion you want, especially when not all of the information is available.

 

[Greatscott]

Ehh..... Something isn't right. Look at all of the dates on the responses...

 

[chip cross]

Ehh..... Something isn't right. Look at all of the dates on the responses...

Last response was two minutes ago?

 

[Greatscott]

Unless I am missing something...

The article was published on July 4, 2009, the first response was Nov 12, 2008...?

...and why is the only article I can find on it, it seems like something like this would be BIG news on all of the networks. I've watched local, CNN, and Fox today, not a peep out of any of them...

 

[chip cross]

Not sure, it was on the homepage at Yahoo and says it was <cite id="yui_3_3_0_1_1316756142824413" class="byline vcard">By Natalie Wolchover | LiveScience.com – <abbr id="yui_3_3_0_1_1316756142824412" title="2011-09-22T20:40:04Z">8 hrs ago


</abbr></cite>

 

[chip cross]

First post was from just a few hours ago.

 

[ohh EPiC FAiL]

i'm partially convinced it was an inside job, but it seems like a lot of the conspiracy theories look way too far into it making it seem unbelievable

 

[jammin311]

Ok here another one for you peeps.


If this was a inside job then why would a Al-qaida magazine send Iran a crude Jihadi equivalent of a cease and desist letter. Again my co-worker had no response to this and he is a self apointed 911 excpert so he says.


http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=239862

 

[Duuuuuuuude]

Ok here another one for you peeps.


If this was a inside job then why would a Al-qaida magazine send Iran a crude Jihadi equivalent of a cease and desist letter. Again my co-worker had no response to this and he is a self apointed 911 excpert so he says.


http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=239862

Terrorists organizations love to lay claim to any havok that goes on. Its even fairly common for a handful of them to all claim responsibility for a single event.

Whether or not Al-Qaida did it, just being credited with 9/11 is a huge plus on their terrorism resume and they would try to thwart any serious challengers that might say otherwise.