FCC # leads to Montage Systems
Montage Systems – Products, discreet vehicle tracking devices. Spireon owns the Talon model,
http://www.spireon.com. New car or used? No reason to be in the vehicle unless used and left from previous owner, payment default recovery, employee work vehicle tracking. If new and not paid off then possibley for vehicle recoverery either through the sales company or in conjunction with lender? If intentionally installed by dealer either for this particular sale or on all sales, then there should be some fine print somewhere in the sales agreement stating they are informing you of such a device installed and reason. It's not OEM that works with any navigation system. If there is mention of it in print then you cannot legally remove it as the purchaser agreed to knowledge of it's existence in the vehicle. I would check all signed sales paperwork if no luck contact seller and simply state what was found and why/what reason it was installed. Record the call if possible just to have proof if they deny knowledge of said device for his own ass coverage if he doesn't reinstall it or disposes/sells it. If no paper trace or dealership denial then sell it on eBay cheap and buy a six pack to help with the next car install/project.
No, no tinfoil here. Was actually in a discussion with a local police officer I know about a week ago on the above mentioned information as well as some other related topics that led into a similar discussion as above. He hit on more broader information related to above then I delved into. We had started talking about the mileage tax now included in NC (I'm in SC but have some family in NC that originally told me about it) which most have no knowledge of until they pay their tags/taxes on their vehicle. It is very broad and vague in it's individual estimation. Discussed reasons behind it as well as the sources pushing that as well as other things coming down the pike leading into a very looong discussion in which he was on the individual citizens rights side and rights to privacy. He was very detailed in information of the now and coming tools law inforcement will have at it's disposal for surveillance and information gathering and profiling on individuals through different vehicle related means, forces behind them, political agendas behind some regulatory related issues that work in conjunction, insurance company backing and agendas behind vehicle "Spying" as he put it, equipment and just how intrusively these tools will be used.
Let's just say for sake of a longer thread discussion he sounded way more "Tinfoil Hat Man" then I was assumed to sound above. I consider myself mostly well informed on current life and history (major history buff). Obviously I nor anyone else knows all nor have I ever eluded too. I was rather in 'Individual Rights Shock' through most of the conversation though. He discussed a lot more than I had current knowledge of, which I thought was pretty decent lol. He discussed the split among law inforcement regarding the erosion of individual privacy rights, as these tools evolve and become more commonly used. Theeeeen he/we moved on to gun ownership rights lol. Looooong conversion that day lol.
I was mearly throwing out 'Food for Fodder' above to think about with all the newer vehicle technology and its many uses, both helpful and nefarious. You know, work the mind a little more than just, Hey, I say one of those the other day" or "I know what that is" and topic/discussion over. Also I was fueled a little with all the news/talk lately dealing with over political correctness lending to the future erosion of free speech as constitutionally intended etc. which is related somewhat overall to above. All the cupcake college kids whining about hurt feelings. The rights we have as citizens and their current erosion all in the so called name of protection, safety etc. So yea, I guess I sounded a little "On a rant" like lol, apologies.
I'm trying another type of hat anyway, tinfoil is too hot here at the beach lol.