ohh EPiC FAiL
Quarry Creeper
yeah it makes sense, and honestly i have no clue what is believed to be the origins of sexual reproduction. guess i have some homework to do.
-
Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.
It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!
Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.
Intelligent Design VS Evolution
- Thread starter CantonAreaCrawler
- Start date
single cell reproduction is pretty much cell division if i remember right. efficient for single cells, not so much for larger organisms. imagine one day, wake up and see another you just hanging out. for more complex organisms, the usual (i say usually because there will be an exception that i can't remember) reproductive system revolves around an egg and something to fertilize that egg. flowers have seeds and pollen, humans have an egg and sperm. now there are hermaphroditic organisms that can do this all in one shot, but reproductive organs promote genetic diversity in the child organism. without that genetic diversity, there is pretty much a telephone pole for a family tree. now the origins are lost on me as well, but to promote a more diverse and possibly better child just makes good sense.
That sounds about right, but its still more of an opinion than a theory. They only proof they can put forth is what is written in the bible. Saying that something has to be supernatural because we can't explain it is a poor way to consider anything. That is also the "God of the Gaps" argument, where God can only inhabit the unknown. I don't know where it originated, but Christians continually latch onto it as proof for ID and continually they lose ground because of it.
Asexuality. There are still animals today that do not need a partner to produce offspring.
"thumbsup"
That was pretty good. But now I'm going to have to watch the entire series 'cause it created more questions than it could have (theoretically) answered. :ror:
ohh EPiC FAiL
Quarry Creeper
you pretty much nailed it. the biggest problem with ID is that it attempts to use science, which always uses occam's razor to eliminate any unnecessary/supernatural explanations, thereby rendering ID a null hypothesis.
until some real, testable, and empirically verifiable evidence comes up for the existence of a designer/creator deity the people pushing ID need to keep it in church and out of science class.
I would rephrase that to say they try to use science to validate or prove belief, which you simply cannot do. There is also the quite large problem they have when science goes against what they believe so they ignore it all together. Some would say that it would be a test of faith...I would say it was a matter of pride...
Even if you found concrete evidence of God, that doesn't make the story of creation true. It is still a man-made book written 2000-5000 years ago.
vonclod
Rock Crawler
there are animals that can change their sex as well..clownfish for example
Armistice
Rock Crawler
That does make sense
Also, some animals, like some frogs, are gendered, but in times of low male counts, the female can reproduce without a male
ctrwannabe
RCC Addict
I liked it as we'll but have not made the time to watch all 7 or so epesodes. Maybe this weekend ill have time and have to keep a notepad handy to jot down all the crap I'm gonna want to look up :ror:
There's actually 15 in the series. 4+ hours. Better pack a snack.
ctrwannabe
RCC Addict
Oh wow ! Nice. Tomorow I'm getting dragged to a wedding but have time in the morning till mid afternoon to kill while my girlfriend gets ready for her gig as bridesmade. I'll hang out arround the house and grill up some veggie burgers :mrgreen:
CantonAreaCrawler
Pebble Pounder
Did anyone else catch the Mermaids the body found on Discovery Sunday night? WOW YOU NEED TO CATCH THAT SHOW AND THEN WEIGH IN ON THIS SUBJECT. THIS MIGHT END SOME OF THE BICKERING! I am still in shock! I have watched it like 8 times because I am that shocked about ID and Evolution and what science has found. I was not expecting to think about my response to this subject.
ohh EPiC FAiL
Quarry Creeper
I take it you didn't happen to notice that its 100% fake. CGI can make things look real, have you seen any action movies in the last few years? Not to mention a simple google search will show that it's known to be fake.
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
CantonAreaCrawler
Pebble Pounder
100% is a bit much. So you dont think the Navy is testing sonar weapons? The bloop is fake? All the old stories through history are fake? There is NO WAY it could be true? Could 100% be a stretch? are we 100% on anything? I know CGI can make it look like that but I dont think it's 100%
Real or not I couldn't say, but I do think it's a bit weird that we know so little about what's in the ocean...
vonclod
Rock Crawler
ctrwannabe
RCC Addict
Don't we know more about the moon than the deep ocean? Every time I see those videos from submersibles the critters are crazy !
ohh EPiC FAiL
Quarry Creeper
Yeah we probably know more about the moon than the depths of the ocean, but a humanoid fish living down there? I doubt it. There is no fossil evidence for the evolution of a humanoid fish species, so why even think that it's a possibility?
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
CantonAreaCrawler
Pebble Pounder
But there is evidence of this and that is why I asked if anyone saw the show on sunday. If not check it out there is SO MUCH INFO! Made me change my thinking on evolution"thumbsup"
CantonAreaCrawler
Pebble Pounder
And we do know more about the moon than the depths of the oceans. We even know more about women:lmao:
