ohh EPiC FAiL
Quarry Creeper
it seems like every time i open up a build thread i see a different jeep. JK YJ, etc. but i can't seem to tell the difference between them all. can anyone elaborate? preferably with pics "thumbsup"
Jeeps have round headlights . I'm not sure what that TJ thing is .![]()
Jeeps have round headlights . I'm not sure what that TJ thing is .![]()
Jk is the newest jeep.
They are bigger overall. Some 2dr some 4dr.
![]()
TJ are smaller. Came out with 4 coil suspension round headlights.
![]()
Yj. Similar to tj but square headlights. And leaf springs.
![]()
I am assuming these are the ones you're referring to
Jeeps have round headlights . I'm not sure what that TJ thing is .![]()
TJs to me are the best looking Wrangler to date. The small size lends itself well to Colorado trails, they were also the first version to have a rubicon version, 16 wheels, dana 44 rear, lockers, cool sticker.:ror:, etc. There is also a massive amount of aftermarket support in the 1:1 world.
TJs from 1997 -2006
The TJ has round headlights, the YJ is the freak!:mrgreen:
The Dana 44 rear axle has been around in Jeeps for a LONG time. CJ5's from the mid 70's had them from the factory and if I'm not mistaken so did earlier CJ's. The CJ7 had a Dana 44 rear axle only during the 1986 model year. Wagoneers ran Dana 44's front and rear off an on through out it's long run. Cherokee's and Comanche's also ran a Dana 44 rear in the early years with the tow package option. All long the before the Wrangler Sahara model did in 1998.
As far as CJ's riding like crap, mine rides pretty good for a leaf sprung rig. It's sprung over but the springs are stock CJ7 replacements from JCW.
Other differences besides headlight shape and suspension are axle, frame and body widths. Axle width started pretty narrow in the early years. My 77 CJ7 had 53" wide front axle and a 52" wide rear. Late model CJ7's ran 56" axles, YJ's went with 60" axles, TJ's are 60.5" and I'm not sure about the JK's but I think they're 66". Someone correct me if I'm wrong about the JK axle.
No problem, I took my 97 GMC down it with 33'sI dare you to take a modern Blazer down the trails in your pics.
No problem, I took my 97 GMC down it with 33'sJust to drag a Toyota out:lmao: partly just because I wanted to see I f it would make it.
Give me a standard cab pickup of any year and and a solid front end and I'll follow a mildly built Jeep any where;-)
I have wheeled with many modern Blazers (Tahoes, Yukons) and with a solid front end they do just fine.
You get to a certain point in crawling where it doesn't matter what you wheel, OEM just won't do and lift and tires aren't enough.
If you swap in a V8 trans and tcase, 1 ton axles is it still a Jeep?![]()
Agreed to a point, the suspensions on the TJ's and newer are a night and day differance over the Cj's. If Jeep would just put a real V8 in a rubicon it would be perfect except for the size...I'm too big of a guy for Jeeps.
I wheeled a CJ7 for a few years and hated it was underpowered and the thing broke down on every trail run:roll: I went back to a Fullsize Blazer.
Blazer Making trails wider since 1967"thumbsup"