| |
03-24-2011, 01:09 PM
| #41 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Pacheco
Posts: 28
|  Quote:
 | |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
03-24-2011, 03:38 PM
| #42 | |||
| Say hello to my dactylion  Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
 | |||
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 03:53 PM
| #43 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
|
Well... I hate the fact that you built ANOTHER rig... and I only have 1.5 rigs... I do like the rear 3-link. |
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 04:32 PM
| #44 | |
| Say hello to my dactylion Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
3-link... Well I mostly dig the shit out of it. It feels stiffer then the stock SCX10 y-link or a 4-bar set-up & it looks cool as shit. I think, though, I may have to tweak it a bit. When articulating on the right side (passenger wheel lifted) the panhard bar hits the diff case limiting "up travel" on that side (the right will not fully compress the shock like the left side does when articulating on the left side). I think this is due to me strapping down the suspension - my front does this too but it seems like it is far less. The easiest fix is to add the bent axial rod ends to each end of the panhard bar. This would move the offending bar up a few millimeters and may create just be enough clearance for that extra travel needed. Another easy fix is just to bend or curve the panhard bar up. (if any of you guys try this be sure to keep the same eye to eye length the same as the recommended set-up for the panhard bar.) There are other ways to remedy this but these are the easiest I think. This IS a personal thing and happens only because I mess with other aspects of the SCX10 suspension so by all means the rig still functions great with the Hand Brothers rear 3-link kit and this product is AWESOME. Last edited by PinchFlat; 03-24-2011 at 04:35 PM. | |
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 05:00 PM
| #45 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
|
No doubt its a cool product, but the limited performance kills it. I'll stick with my DMG truss for now.  |
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 05:02 PM
| #46 | |
| Say hello to my dactylion Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 06:09 PM
| #47 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,443
|
I am voting for both of the tards....not voting for piggy, he is mean  Looks good pinch |
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 09:04 PM
| #48 | |
| Say hello to my dactylion Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
& Thanks.
| |
|
| |
|
03-24-2011, 11:52 PM
| #49 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Tuscaloosa
Posts: 855
|
Nice build so far. I have a question for you. Can you explain how you strapped the suspension. My FJ40 has a ton of tube work and is really top heavy. I have been trying to figure out what I want to do to get the weight lower and increase performance.
|
|
| |
|
03-25-2011, 04:05 AM
| #50 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Barboursville, WV
Posts: 1,448
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
03-25-2011, 08:56 AM
| #51 | |
| Say hello to my dactylion Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
03-25-2011, 02:09 PM
| #52 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Tuscaloosa
Posts: 855
|
Thanks for the info. Let me make sure I understand how it works. By attaching it in the middle you lower your ride height by compressing the shocks but still keep full suspension trave because its like the axle is on a swivel and the shocks can compress and extend. Is that half way correct?
|
|
| |
|
03-25-2011, 02:24 PM
| #53 | |
| Say hello to my dactylion Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
03-27-2011, 06:39 PM
| #54 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 57
|
any updates? was progressing pretty quick for a minuet, its prob done, huh?
|
|
| |
|
03-27-2011, 08:50 PM
| #55 |
| Newbie Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Green Bay
Posts: 46
|
Very sweet rig and love the chassis!  |
|
| |
|
03-28-2011, 04:49 AM
| #56 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: middle,tn
Posts: 1,326
|
i seen in one of those pics from the rear where it looks like you have a panhard on the rear. if so please explain why and. could you post some pics of it and one of the front panhard. these things are kicking my butt. to the piont where im just gonna run the servo on the axle and say screw it. so any helpful info or pics would be greatly appreciated..thanks man and keep up the awesome builds  |
|
| |
|
03-28-2011, 09:50 AM
| #57 | ||||
| Say hello to my dactylion Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 4,470
| Quote:
 Quote:
Quote:
Info... Quote:
| ||||
|
| |
|
03-28-2011, 02:59 PM
| #58 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: middle,tn
Posts: 1,326
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
03-28-2011, 03:04 PM
| #59 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: middle,tn
Posts: 1,326
| ok i am a retard..(not related to utard) i wish
ok i just figured it out the 3 link allows axles to have movement side to side the pan hard eliminates that wow..i cant believe it took me that long to realize what the hell i was thinking lol...if you could still post a pic of ur front panhard it;ll help out im having lots of trouble with this stuff..thanks man and sorry i wasted ur time in the previous post |
|
| |
|
03-28-2011, 07:37 PM
| #60 | |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Linwood
Posts: 98
| Quote:
X2! PinchFlat- Mind sharing what size tube or rod you are using for this? It looks awesome - fantastic job! | |
|
| |
 |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/1-9-scale-rigs/306470-pinchflat%92s-msd-scale-nats-ttc-entry-sami-buggy.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Зарубежные проекты 1.9 - Страница 4 | This thread | Refback | 10-05-2011 06:13 AM | |
| |
Linear Mode
