Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Scale Rigs Brand Specific Tech > Axial Brand Scale Rock Crawlers > Axial SCX-10
Loading

Notices

Thread: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2012, 10:18 PM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newmarket, Canada
Posts: 236
Default pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

Ive got a set of proline 2.2 flat irons and proline 2.2 badlands and that i could get some rims for and use on my dingo, but i was wondering if the stock axial 1.9 ripsaws were any better? Or the noticeable differences between using 1.9 vs 2.2? would i have to make any changes to run 2.2's other than cutting out the body a bit more?
jp0160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-05-2012, 10:44 PM   #2
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Africa,JHB
Posts: 155
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

One of the things you will notice with going up to the 2.2 from the 1.9, provided that the tires themselves have a larger diameter over the 1.9s, is that you will get less hung up on your diffs due to the taller wheel, so more ground clearance. So that’s a positive. Also, the wheels will be slightly wider so you will get a bit more stability. As for comparing the ripsaws and flatirons, they pretty much of a muchness. I crawl with a bunch of mates over here that are all running flatirons and i don’t see a noticeable difference in the places / lines that any of us can take.

I am not too sure with the 2.2,s but i know the flat irons are a 105mm diameter and the ripsaws a 110mm. so slightly taller. i suspect the same kind of difference in the 2.2 respectively. You might need to move your shock mounts to a lower hole to give a bit more body clearance with the 2.2 or as you say, trim the body a bit.

At the end of the day its personal choice what you run and a bit of trial and error as to what fits your needs, style and what you after in terms of look and feel.

Hope this is of some help

Cheers,
T
Titus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 11:32 PM   #3
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,487
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

There's not much wheel well clearance with the stock 1.9's on the Dingo. Going to 2.2's will require you to lift the body quite a bit or remove the fender flares and cut out the wheel well openings.
Solitaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 12:12 AM   #4
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 32
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

i was wondering the same question....... i have a honcho body though so def less trimming. the dingo body is massive though take some pics and post them if you can.
snow4664 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 12:39 AM   #5
Nope..
 
Brainstain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Whiteland, Indiana
Posts: 1,849
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

You could also go with a super tall 1.9 if you just want the height.
Brainstain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 03:15 PM   #6
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newmarket, Canada
Posts: 236
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

my Flat irons are around 1/2" taller than the stock dingo ripsaws, they are a few years old but still in great shape, they are from my old custom dual evader axle/trans MOA crawler, the sidewall reads 2.14 x 4.84. most of the pictures ive seen of other trucks with 2.2's look way too tall to keep the truck looking scale-ish, the flat irons seem to be a ok compromise.

I love the fender flares on the dingo body so i don't want to lose them, ill be running a jeep rubicon body from my savage x so i can chop it up to fit a 2.2 tire. will post pics if i go through with it
jp0160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 05:54 PM   #7
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NW ATL
Posts: 387
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?


Are spacers or some other accessory required when using 2.2's with the SCX-10?

I have some 2.2 wheels - the area of the wheel that fits onto the SCX-10 12mm hub seems "too deep" compared to the 1.9 wheels.
Axial Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 07:20 PM   #8
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Back from vacation!!!
Posts: 356
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

Here's my sons (former) Dingo on 2.2's with a lift I made. We have since went back to 1.9's and Honcho-bodied running the 1.9 Rok-Lox which are as tall as a lot of 2.2's. The 2.2 wheels look better on a Dingo than a Honcho, but still a little out-of scale on both, IMO. I get the same pumpkin-clearence with the 1.9 LOX as the 2.2's. The truck is a lot more peppy too. You gain some un-spring weight with the heavier 2/2's.

ridepate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 07:46 PM   #9
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Of The Pines
Posts: 43
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

Try the 1.9 Pitbulls, larger than the Ripsaws I had, better traction, a little wider and taller. I'm sold on the PBS tires!

Mitch
75LC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 08:47 PM   #10
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 152
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

I had a blast with the 1.9 flat irons. They are kind of a scrappy little tire that performs better than they look and offer a challenge to the driver. However, here in Missouri they struggle with hill climbs in the woods with lots of hardwood leaves on the ground. For that reason I have switched to 2.2 for the height/width advantage on trails.
MntnHntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 01:27 PM   #11
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newmarket, Canada
Posts: 236
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

I got a set of proline 2.2 beadlocks for 22.99, rears are 2.2 flat irons, front is 2.2 badlands. Heres the stock 1.9 ripsaws and the stock dingo body, i dont run rock guards and i run a different body, thats why it looks jacked up at the front

jp0160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 07:37 PM   #12
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Terengganu
Posts: 12
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

how about the fender..doesnt it rub the tire?
niks8700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 08:51 AM   #13
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Placer County
Posts: 843
Default Re: pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires?

Quote:
Originally Posted by niks8700 View Post
how about the fender..doesnt it rub the tire?
He said the body in the pic was just for visual reference, not how it was setup to run.

Most likely they wil rub and will need adjustment on: body trimming, extra lift is integrated, or axle is moved forward via links.

One thing these 1.9 vs 2.2 threads fail to mention is the necessity to change your gearing after the change. Otherwise you could easily smoke your electronics.
Perkolator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



pros/cons of 2.2 vs 1.9 tires? - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FJ Cruiser pros and cons. offroad1911 Chit Chat 25 02-11-2012 11:54 AM
Pros and Cons wardal General Crawlers 1 11-21-2011 06:20 PM
Pros and Cons Iberian Newbie General 20 01-13-2010 07:22 PM
MOA Pros and Cons Iberian Team Losi Comp Crawler 19 12-30-2009 10:13 PM
Pros and Cons of 50/50 to 60/40 zboarder720 Newbie General 5 05-14-2006 10:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com