08-07-2010, 03:47 PM | #61 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
But their 6.0 wouldn't handle the abuse we put on them.They thought a 6.4 with 2 turbos would.But it also has problems with the heavy and steady work loads. The 6.4 can meet the new imission standards, they aren't comming out with a BIGGER desplacment to meet requirments. A smaller motor will have problems with heat if its being worked hard. it doesnt matter how many coolers you put on it to keep the heat away. I think they are taking the reigns from nav. cuz they need to get their name back. the 6.0 and 6.4 have both hurt their image and have helped drive the sale of the dodge cummins. but if you think that they are creating a larger motor to meet imission standard,nope think again a larger motor can handle more heat. and thats what a motor pulling 26,000 lbs creates,heat and alot of it. Last edited by rock hard; 08-07-2010 at 03:49 PM. | |
Sponsored Links | |
08-07-2010, 04:38 PM | #62 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Sale Creek, TN
Posts: 712
|
I had a F350 with the 6.0 and it blew the head gasket at 150,000 miles and then the Ford dealer told me that is was because of water in the fuel and that was why it was running rough. So I believed them and changed the fuel filters and it kept getting worse so I finally took it to a diesel shop only to find out that the head gasket was blown and they would have to pull the cab off and rebuild the engine. Thanks alot Ford.
|
08-07-2010, 04:40 PM | #63 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
thats what ford gets for those hiring enginers from gm and chrysler | |
08-07-2010, 05:07 PM | #64 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Pa
Posts: 563
| Quote:
The future mpg and emissions requirements are only going to get more strict. "Phase 3A - 2010 to 2016 2009 President Obama announced a new national fuel economy and emissions policy that incorporated California's contested plan to curb greenhouse gas emissions on its own, apart from federal government regulations. Fleet mileage for cars will have to average 42 mpg, and trucks will have to average 26 mpg by 2016. It's not clear if these numbers are to be based on EPA averages — what's printed on a car's window sticker — or CAFE standards." "A second round of California standards, known as Low Emission Vehicle II, is timed to coordinate with the Tier 2 rollout. Under LEV II regulations, the Tier I and TLEV classifications were removed for 2004, and the remaining LEV, ULEV, and SULEV categories were made more stringent. These stricter versions are therefore known as "LEV II", "ULEV II", and "SULEV II"." Last edited by dkf; 08-07-2010 at 05:45 PM. | |
08-08-2010, 12:32 PM | #65 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
and look what dodge did,they bored and stroked the 5.9. the results. more power,less fuel mileage,do you really think it lowers immissions to use more fuel,create more power. I have a running buddy who is the top mech. at our ford house. the 6.0 and 6.4 just cant take the heat,they have cooler after cooler on these motors trying to get the heat away from the motor cuz they cant take it. but by all means,if anybody wants to believe that the reason they are going with a new and bigger motor is to lower immission I understand. my common sense however wont allow me to buy into it. now if you said that ford is doing this so they can have a motor that meets immission standard while still providing the power and dependablity that the ford name deserves. that I can buy ford will not come out and say that thier motors are junk,they will come up with an excuse to change motors. and the imissions standards is that excuse. Last edited by rock hard; 08-08-2010 at 12:46 PM. | |
08-08-2010, 12:59 PM | #66 |
06 Super National Champ Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Stark Industries Bar and Grill
Posts: 11,361
| Emission standards. Seems Ford is also putting out hp and torque ratings for the new 6.7 gasser not at the max potential of the engine, but at the point where the engine meets emission standards. http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/sh...&postcount=331 I would expect them to do the same for the new diesels to meet EPA requirements. |
08-08-2010, 01:07 PM | #67 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Nunya Idaho...
Posts: 1,559
|
I havent read all the posts but if you are willing to spend some money on upgrading the head gaskets and install head studs then deleting a few items, the 6.0 is an awesome engine and is a great design. imo. It can produce some killer power too when those two main things are taken care of. Its just that ford got in a big ass hurry to release it and several things were over looked. 6.4 is the one to stay away from in my opinion. No matter what you go with, make sure you just monitor your temps, thats where so many diesel drivers go wrong.
|
08-08-2010, 04:51 PM | #68 | |||
Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Pa
Posts: 563
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Go on some Ford forums, study past and future emissions standards and read numerous threads from the engineers who were part of Fords powertrain team like I did and you will see I'm not feeding you a line of BS. Last edited by dkf; 08-08-2010 at 06:57 PM. | |||
| |