Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Heritage Crawlers > EnRoute Berg
Loading

Notices

Thread: Survey Of "Clod" Stall For Newage Owners

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2008, 09:52 PM   #1
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VARCOR
Posts: 1,826
Default Survey Of "Clod" Stall For Newage Owners

Just reflecting back on running Clod axles, and still seeing some local guys running Clods................I am just not getting anywhere near the amount of stall that Clods seem to have in my experience.

Just seems like on a lot of Clods I have run, or seen run, it takes the minimal amount of torque to stall the rear axle, whereas on the Newage, I just don't get much. Sure, given the right situation, the rear will stall (heck, both will given the right scenario), but just no where near as much as with Clods.

Maybe it is just my electronics, or the improvements of electronics in general in the past couple of years.

Have you noticed a lack of general stall?
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-26-2008, 10:07 PM   #2
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC
 
JohnRobHolmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
Default

Smaller tires, less vehicle weight, lower effective rollout= more relative force needed for stalling. I have noticed the same thing, there isn't near as much stall on the rear as compared to a clod because the motor is the same power but the vehicle is much lighter.
JohnRobHolmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 10:23 PM   #3
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CITY of CHAMPIONS!!
Posts: 2,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRobHolmes View Post
Smaller tires, less vehicle weight, lower effective rollout= more relative force needed for stalling. I have noticed the same thing, there isn't near as much stall on the rear as compared to a clod because the motor is the same power but the vehicle is much lighter.
exactly what i was going to say.
rockbound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 09:57 PM   #4
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VARCOR
Posts: 1,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRobHolmes View Post
I have noticed the same thing, there isn't near as much stall on the rear as compared to a clod because the motor is the same power but the vehicle is much lighter.
I can't buy the lighter weight scenario. My Newage, with just an aluminum backbone chassis, is about 7.25 lbs, which is more than many 2.2 Clods, and considered a "pig" by 2.2 standards. Heck, I had a 2.2 Clod guy at our last local comp pick up my rig and make a comment about how heavy the thing was.

Just throwing this out there, but I am thinking it is more of a tightness of the drivetrain issue. We all know the gears are tight in the Newage, much tighter than the Clod ever was.

I finally got my Newage running with 3 position dig today (rear free), and was amazed by how much drag there was in the driveline even when freewheeling. On a level surface, the rear end wanted to brake/drag even when the motor was free to spin.

I am starting to think that "Clod Stall" truly was a Clod thing, and not an axle-mounted motor thing.
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 10:13 PM   #5
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: drillin Holes for the man
Posts: 2,736
Default

from what I am seeing, it all comes from gear size. The clods have very large diameter 32p gear. The newage axles have much smaller 48p gears. It takes more power to turn the large clod gears, hence it takes less bind to stall them.
bigflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 12:23 AM   #6
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NCVRCC
Posts: 346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb View Post
I can't buy the lighter weight scenario. My Newage, with just an aluminum backbone chassis, is about 7.25 lbs, which is more than many 2.2 Clods, and considered a "pig" by 2.2 standards. Heck, I had a 2.2 Clod guy at our last local comp pick up my rig and make a comment about how heavy the thing was.

Just throwing this out there, but I am thinking it is more of a tightness of the drivetrain issue. We all know the gears are tight in the Newage, much tighter than the Clod ever was.

I finally got my Newage running with 3 position dig today (rear free), and was amazed by how much drag there was in the driveline even when freewheeling. On a level surface, the rear end wanted to brake/drag even when the motor was free to spin.

I am starting to think that "Clod Stall" truly was a Clod thing, and not an axle-mounted motor thing.
I run a 6.5 pound Raptor2 rig with 55 turn cans and 6 tooth pinions. I still get stall in certain situtations. It probably has to do with the poor gear ratio.
WKKILLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 02:01 AM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: BV
Posts: 1,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb View Post
I can't buy the lighter weight scenario. My Newage, with just an aluminum backbone chassis, is about 7.25 lbs, which is more than many 2.2 Clods, and considered a "pig" by 2.2 standards. Heck, I had a 2.2 Clod guy at our last local comp pick up my rig and make a comment about how heavy the thing was.

Just throwing this out there, but I am thinking it is more of a tightness of the drivetrain issue. We all know the gears are tight in the Newage, much tighter than the Clod ever was.

I finally got my Newage running with 3 position dig today (rear free), and was amazed by how much drag there was in the driveline even when freewheeling. On a level surface, the rear end wanted to brake/drag even when the motor was free to spin.

I am starting to think that "Clod Stall" truly was a Clod thing, and not an axle-mounted motor thing.
I've also noticed that my enroute axles are extremely tight. Makes me wonder how how AX-10 guys put up with their shoddy lockers:?. Either way, I would think that more drivetrain drag would cause more stall. I still think it has to do with the relative lack of leverage standard comp 2.2 tires have on the axle. The rollout is the only thing I can conceive of that would change it.
chrisjlittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 09:10 PM   #8
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigflex View Post
from what I am seeing, it all comes from gear size. The clods have very large diameter 32p gear. The newage axles have much smaller 48p gears. It takes more power to turn the large clod gears, hence it takes less bind to stall them.
That shouldn't make any difference, If the gears are the same size, ie, reduction stays the same, it will take the same amount of torque to turn them.

Part of the reason that we get clod stall is that we run 2 motors off one speed controller. If you ran separate controllers, I think the stall would be negligible.

I run 2 different pinions in mine, and have minimized it a little, but it is still there.


Brad.
Udlman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 12:11 AM   #9
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: drillin Holes for the man
Posts: 2,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Udlman View Post
That shouldn't make any difference, If the gears are the same size, ie, reduction stays the same, it will take the same amount of torque to turn them.

Part of the reason that we get clod stall is that we run 2 motors off one speed controller. If you ran separate controllers, I think the stall would be negligible.

I run 2 different pinions in mine, and have minimized it a little, but it is still there.


Brad.
thats just it though. They are not the same size. if the gear is larger diameter it takes less force to turn it. just think of it like the pulleys on a drill press.
bigflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:49 AM   #10
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Posts: 277
Default

Mechanical advantage is mechanical advantage. Its not that important what the gear diameter is as what the total gear ratio is from motor to wheel. The higher the ratio (like 50:1 vs. 30:1), the easier it is for the motor to turn the wheel and the harder it is for the wheel to turn the motor.
LincolnBlack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:56 AM   #11
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigflex View Post
thats just it though. They are not the same size. if the gear is larger diameter it takes less force to turn it. just think of it like the pulleys on a drill press.


Ok now that I have had a look at the Newage stuff, you are trying to compare apples and bananas, they are two entirely different configurations, therefore having different gear reductions. The only thing they have in common are that the motors are on the axle's.

Ok, The stock gear ratio on the Newage is 40:1 Stock gear ratio on a clod is 30:1 . The newage ratio is higher, therefore won't stall as easy.


Brad.


Beat me to it Linc.. No go back and hide in the pit where you belong :-P:-P:-P:-P:-P:-P:-P:-P:-P:-P

Last edited by Udlman; 06-02-2008 at 01:58 AM.
Udlman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 02:58 AM   #12
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hilo
Posts: 430
Default

Dont know if clod stall if present on 2.2 clods but the smaller diameter of the 2.2's also affect gearing.
rn38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 03:23 AM   #13
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 11,196
Default

From what I have found out myself is. The Lower geared and more volts you run. The Less Stall you'll get. My 2.2 Clod maybe stalls every 20th time out. Has to just me the perfect spot for it to happen. Never happens on hills. Only in a bind. Which is what I like the most. Its the SLIPPER for CLODS... Kind works like a Shafty in that way. Prevents breaks. But not always. Just last yearin OK. I jammed both right side tires in a V-Noch and snapped to axles at once. No stall... Now on my super. I run the same set up and it does stall more. But The hieght and width of the Moab XL's is the doing there. Some stall is a good thing. Many have said that for years.
run2jeepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 05:54 AM   #14
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 7,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Udlman View Post
The stock gear ratio on the Newage is 40:1 Stock gear ratio on a clod is 30:1 . The newage ratio is higher, therefore won't stall as easy.
We have a winner!


Fishmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 06:01 AM   #15
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 11,196
Default

Stock Clod Gear Ratio
Pinion
9T 54 : 1
8T 61 : 1
7T 70: 1
6T 81:1
run2jeepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 07:07 AM   #16
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: www.rccrawler.com
Posts: 1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by run2jeepn View Post
From what I have found out myself is. The Lower geared and more volts you run. The Less Stall you'll get. My 2.2 Clod maybe stalls every 20th time out. Has to just me the perfect spot for it to happen. Never happens on hills. Only in a bind. Which is what I like the most. Its the SLIPPER for CLODS... Kind works like a Shafty in that way. Prevents breaks. But not always. Just last yearin OK. I jammed both right side tires in a V-Noch and snapped to axles at once. No stall... Now on my super. I run the same set up and it does stall more. But The hieght and width of the Moab XL's is the doing there. Some stall is a good thing. Many have said that for years.
exactly ...JohnRobHolmes is right since electronics are the stall reason and who could understand electronics here more than him.


who cares about stall ''I want a Berg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheHeadHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 07:33 AM   #17
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 7,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by run2jeepn View Post
Stock Clod Gear Ratio
Pinion
9T 54 : 1
8T 61 : 1
7T 70: 1
6T 81:1

R2J, Those numbers don't seem right

I found these #'s in an old JIA post.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonInAugusta View Post
Which gear ratio do you guys think is "best" for a 55t?

Here's what each pinion gives as a drive ratio.

8T 48.89:1
9T 43.46:1
10T 39.11:1
11T 35.56:1
12T 32.59:1
13T 30.08:1
14T 27.94:1
15T 26.07:1
16T 24.44:1
Its the one I have been using for awhile now.

Last edited by Fishmaxx; 06-06-2008 at 07:50 AM.
Fishmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 07:54 AM   #18
I wanna be Dave
 
FrankyRizzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 7,172
Default

I welcome a little bit of stall. Keeps you from flopping on your lid when approaching climbs. Nice thing about the Bergs is that they are very well geared so it is not a huge issue. I agree that the smaller wheel diameter and lighter weight rig itself makes a difference as well.

I think some other things that play into it is the Sidewinder ESC I am running as well. With its programmability you can send 100% power and the smoother stepping the power is on tap better than ever.

I am really enjoying mine but I do miss driving my shafty.
FrankyRizzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 08:18 AM   #19
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,043
Default

i don't have any stall on my clod
BrandonW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 08:21 AM   #20
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 11,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishmaxx View Post

R2J, Those numbers don't seem right

I found these #'s in an old JIA post.....



Its the one I have been using for awhile now.
It maybe wrong. I got it from Hot-Racing's website. From there 100:1 Gear ratio Alumn Clod Gear Set.
run2jeepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com