04-13-2007, 08:57 PM | #141 |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
| |
Sponsored Links | |
04-13-2007, 08:59 PM | #142 |
MODERATOR™ Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
| You originally posted that at 3:49. |
04-14-2007, 12:55 AM | #143 |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
|
Yeah I know I just had to think it through again to make sure I was right. |
04-14-2007, 06:46 AM | #144 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: St. Louis (High Ridge)
Posts: 1,279
|
ok, so i took a shot of my wip, and I think I can lable the lines I drew on it, and it looks like it should be fairly neutral, but I get some wicked torque twist. Here is the shot. Here is the link to a blank if someone wants to make suggestion http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...1/P4140272.jpg I tried to color code the lines to make it easier |
04-14-2007, 07:18 AM | #145 |
MODERATOR™ Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
|
Your diagonal blue line represents the line of force. It needs to intersect the blue vertical line drawn through the front hub at the height of your center of gravity, the green line. Now look where your two yellow lines are. Besides the fact they probably intersect about 5 feet in front of the truck, that point is below the line of force and that means your truck squats. |
04-14-2007, 07:57 AM | #146 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: St. Louis (High Ridge)
Posts: 1,279
|
so i changed the mounting point of the lower link axle side to bring the IC? in. this should be more stable because everything intersects? dang this head cold slowing me down. it would also get the lower link down further to protect teh driveshaft more |
04-14-2007, 08:29 AM | #147 |
MODERATOR™ Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
|
Here's your correct lines, based off of your guess as to where the chassis CG is located. What is really hurting your truck is the very high CG. |
04-14-2007, 08:54 AM | #148 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: St. Louis (High Ridge)
Posts: 1,279
|
so would I need to try and get the cg in between the yellow link lines where they intersect the blue vertical at the front hub? like put the battery on top of the front upper links and clocking the motor out the side the requisite 90-95 degreese? I may have to play with the chassis anyway once I get the 96t spur. or just saying fudge it torque lean is good for you Last edited by hairba11; 04-14-2007 at 08:56 AM. |
04-14-2007, 09:10 AM | #149 |
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
|
Torque twist and squat are different items to deal with. You need to lower your chassis CG closer to the roll center (a whole nuther can of worms). Step one would be to remount your battery on the front axle or find another low spot for your battery.
|
04-14-2007, 09:30 AM | #150 |
MODERATOR™ Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
| Check this out. Random guess for chassis CG. 2/3A battery pack fit between frame rails in front. CG might be a little higher, maybe not... |
04-14-2007, 10:06 AM | #151 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: St. Louis (High Ridge)
Posts: 1,279
|
so even if I moved the shock mounting points up, it wouldn't really help because even tho the CG is lower, the links are now level and not pointing up and they still cross under the force line. and the tranny can drag. hmmm |
04-14-2007, 01:10 PM | #152 |
MWRCA'er Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Machesney Park IL
Posts: 3,995
|
I tried jacking with the links last night for hours on end with no change. I tired lowering the upper links no change. I tried a asmetrical setup no change in the amount of torque twist at all. The rear just has a lot of torque twist making it seem as though the rear suspension is rising but it's not best I can tell. The rear wrenchs over causing the truck to three wheel up a hill no matter what I do. There is zero torque twist in the front.
|
04-14-2007, 10:09 PM | #153 |
MODERATOR™ Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
| |
04-14-2007, 10:17 PM | #154 |
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
|
Or raise his roll center. If the rear upper link was raised on both axle and chassis it would help. I think triangulating at the chassis instead of the back would also change the twist, but I cant even start to guess how.
|
04-15-2007, 03:11 PM | #155 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: england
Posts: 85
|
yes, making the axis of rotation of the axles different from the axis of the center driveshaft, would cause the driveshaft to push against the links that hold the center of rotation of the axles, rather than push the wheels up and down... well you'll still get torque steer but to a lesser amount, and you'll get a kind of 'articulate steer' because your whole vehicle is moved side to side from the articulation have you considered changing the pinion angle? like, instead of the pinion facing straight away from the center tranny, it is angled slightly upwards (i.e.facing away from the ground)...as in, remount your axle so that the driveshaft points downwards, and the joint in the shaft will be at a steeper angle what this causes is it makes the torque from the driveshaft rotate the axle at an angle that is incompatible with how the links make your axles rotate... it would push and pull the links instead of raising and lowering your wheels Last edited by carmatic; 04-15-2007 at 03:18 PM. |
04-15-2007, 07:50 PM | #156 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
| Quote:
I guess the torque twist fairy payed him a visit and fixed for him. | |
04-15-2007, 08:57 PM | #157 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: South Charleston
Posts: 89
|
Tell me what you guys think of my link placement. I have some major torque twist. It is a 60/40 setup and seems to climb well, but the torque twist limits its ability to flex. I have a integy spring kit ordered that has 5 different set of spring rates. My rear axle is clocked and my front shocks have been shortened to 3.5 in in the front. Any ideas on how I could get rid of my torque twist? It is bad, as soon as you throttle it it lifts one front wheel and when reversing it lifts a rear wheel. |
04-16-2007, 07:31 AM | #158 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Martinsburg WV
Posts: 2,781
| I'd say this is the root of your problem - heinously extreme angles in your front shaft. The torque applied to these joints when they're just about at the limit of their travel is going to induce lots of twist. The hard part of it is that the exteme angle of the front driveline is caused by other discrepancies in your set up- I can't figure out why this rig is so monster truck-like? Is it the shock placement? Those bent lower links? Did you have to clock your rear axle that far to make your dig work? Last edited by Big Mike; 04-16-2007 at 07:41 AM. |
04-16-2007, 07:49 AM | #159 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: South Charleston
Posts: 89
|
Yeah my ride height is 3.75" which i feel is a lil high. Right now it sits right at 12.5 wheelbase and if I move the links around too much I can't get the wheelbase set at 12.5. The rear axle is clocked that much just because thats how it worked out when mounting the links and it came out to 12.5 setup that way.
|
04-16-2007, 06:57 PM | #160 | |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: england
Posts: 85
| Quote:
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/general-crawlers/54791-anti-squat-suspension-tech.html | ||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
• Afficher le sujet - Anti-Cabrage VS Torque-Twist | This thread | Refback | 10-05-2011 03:42 PM |
| |