Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Superclass Crawlers
Loading

Notices

Thread: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2014, 11:10 PM   #21
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik D_lux View Post

If you ever have a problem breaking tubes where you moved the servo forward into it, try moving the motor back next time and see if you can leave the tube.
Not sure I follow you, I'll have to look inside the case, but by moving the motor back won't it also change contact on the pinion gear?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik D_lux View Post
If you want to try and get those shocks out of the way you could reduce their overall length just a touch to do this. It looks like you have external limiters on the shock shaft so maybe you could simply screw the shock shaft as far in on the rod end as possible? This makes the shock shorter and also acts as a limiter. You could also cut down the bottom one. Maybe you have already done this....? Shortening the shock will do a lot to get it above the link and bring the height of the car down.
Good point, I'll try that! I was more focused on no spring pre-load. I think I've seen a guy that makes "no pre-load shock cups". But I'm cheap at times
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-04-2014, 11:32 PM   #22
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by cabron View Post
how long are those universal axles? from the universal pin to the dogbone pin
do the fit into the bully knuckles? what bearings?

Universal Pin - Dog bone is 3.5" or 89mm
Universal Pin - wheel hub pin is 25mm

I used the Bully knuckles with an 8x12x3.5mm bearing from nitrorcx.com

Ball Bearings 8X12X3.5 6P

One inner bearing and two outer bearings then a standard 1/8 scale 17mm wheel hub/hex. Here are some cheap ones: 17mm Hex Hub $3.75 for 4 hubs is pretty hard to beat!

The stub shaft uses a 2.5mm cross pin for the wheel hub. I would imagine the hubs above would also be 2.5mm. The hubs I already had used a 3mm pin so I just drilled the stub shaft out.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 12:06 AM   #23
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default

Okay, So I went to my second comp Sunday and made some good progress. Still not on the same level as the others but not quite as embarrassing as my first time out. I could immediately notice the stability of the lower ride height but still need to get the Sedona's on.

Name:  image-2157758365.jpg
Views: 701
Size:  123.0 KB

The stock dual ESCs seemed to do fine with with Castle BEC on 3S.

I had some previous experience with a stick controller and rear steer but no dig/ bias. This was my first run out with dual ESC and WOW that complicates the driving on the sticks. My left stick controlling the rear motor was not spring loaded so it was a lot to adjust. I like the throttle control of a pistol and will work with it for now.

The biggest short coming will soon be drive time. My goal is to get the Hacked GT3B going and see if this super can actually complete 3 courses.

On the last course I broke a molded knuckle on the front axle. I had previously drilled the webbing which weakened the inner c. I'll try another set out of curiosity as I think these may still hold up. Either way, down the road I'll get the AX10 inner C's like the rear.

Name:  IMG_1382.jpg
Views: 704
Size:  101.0 KB

Next up will be the front axle-
-Shafts (same as rear)
-Bully Knuckles -Knuckle weights
-upgrade the small 3rd to take the abuse of good tires and wheel weight
I'll also need to get something better going for a chassis.

Last edited by Crawl in Az; 02-05-2014 at 12:17 AM.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 07:54 AM   #24
Wanna get? Gotta want.
 
Erik D_lux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 7,052
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawl in Az View Post
Not sure I follow you, I'll have to look inside the case, but by moving the motor back won't it also change contact on the pinion gear?



Good point, I'll try that! I was more focused on no spring pre-load. I think I've seen a guy that makes "no pre-load shock cups". But I'm cheap at times
Yeah, moving it back will change the mesh but thats why you move it up also. Moving it up gets it closer, moving it back takes it further away. Search the Berg section. Anybody who puts the servo between the axle and motor must do this.

Yeah, pre load could mess your day up. You could go to a softer spring, shorter spring or even cut your spring down to help with this. Of course you could to the no pre load cups too
Erik D_lux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 08:47 AM   #25
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Alright, cool. I'll add that to the list when I do the front axle.

Thank you.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 10:08 AM   #26
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Glendale Az
Posts: 384
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Well looks like you may need to come over and look at that chassis and links.....trade you for a twelve pack.........












No seriously.....
bquin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 11:41 PM   #27
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Thank for the hook up Brandon!

More to come on this later. This Sub-Par Crawler may actually turn into an old school bad ass!

Last edited by Crawl in Az; 02-17-2014 at 11:52 PM.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 11:54 PM   #28
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Got my Fly Sky GT-3B hacked and configured. Took a little bit to figure out the menus but was well worth the headache.

Name:  IMG_1447.jpg
Views: 579
Size:  103.7 KB

Here is how I set up the controller:
Rear Steer is on the -D/R+ (Top slider button on grip)
Dig & bias control the Dual ESC on Ch3 Trim (Bottom slider button on grip)
Both the rear steer and Dig are set up in 20% steps with a long hold (1 sec) will either move to end point or back to center.
The bottom button labeled “CH3” is set up as a simple reset for the dig/bias. It will beep and reset back to 0 or equal power to both axles.

I’ve been able to run a few packs and so far I’m real pleased with it how natural it comes. The dig reset seems pretty helpful eliminating the need to look at the display. I like the dig integrated with the bias and have already found it helpful on obstacles. The stock ESC is not programable so I can basically adjust the drag brake allowing the channel to serve a dual purpose of dig and bias. I couldn’t think of much use for the crab or 4 wheel steer options. I had them on my stick controller switches, they are cool for driving around in the living room but didn't ever find them to be much help on real obstacles. I'd prefer to just operate them independently.

To make the slider buttons easier to find it seems most add a screw or bolt to make the button larger. I used a 6mm socket head bolt and it works pretty well.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2014, 12:02 AM   #29
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default

At the same time as getting the new controller I was able to get the Sedona’s on.

Name:  IMG_1406.jpg
Views: 587
Size:  158.6 KB

I know this thing still has a long way to go but good tires and foams alone has made a noticeable difference. The old tires had 5oz. per front tire of stick on weights to help move weight forward. The Sedona’s climb an hook up much better. They don’t even have any weight yet but do weigh about 1oz more per tire/wheel combo.

Name:  image-2486158159.jpg
Views: 561
Size:  113.2 KB

Last edited by Crawl in Az; 02-18-2014 at 12:08 AM.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 10:46 PM   #30
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Ujoint axles and bully knuckles done in the front. I didn't mess with lowering the servo down between the motor and axle tube for now, but will look towards this down the road like the rear is set up.

Name:  IMG_1476.jpg
Views: 573
Size:  80.6 KB

I was able to cut out some wheel weight holders from 1/4" plastic. I drilled and tapped the bully knuckle for a 3mm bolt to hold the plastic onto knuckle.

Name:  IMG_1478.jpg
Views: 539
Size:  94.8 KB

A few thoughts/ questions I had about wheel weights: (Please give me your thoughts)
1. I like the idea of putting the weight in front of the axle so it can still be effective on the front tires on steep verticals instead of transferring to the rears. Not sure if it makes a difference, but it makes sense in my head.
2. Are wheel weights ever used to balance the rig? I'm running my battery on the front axle so to balance the axle I added more weight to the drivers side than the passenger side. (apx 2.5 oz more on the driver side)

To my surprise the front small 3rd is still holding up. I ordered some goodies from D_Lux in anticipation of the small 3rd breaking and knock on wood it has been holding up fine.... Could be I'm still running the stock motors....

My driving still needs work but here is a climb at my little testing area. RC Super class Crawl - YouTube
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 05:56 PM   #31
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 74
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

nice video man! talk about performance improvement over stock!

I'd say you can add one more bolt on the left to balance your battery on the right, will do no harm and might help the rig perform the same in off camber situations to the left and to the right.
2WheelFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 06:08 PM   #32
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: presKit
Posts: 690
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

1. I like the idea of putting the weight in front of the axle so it can still be effective on the front tires on steep verticals instead of transferring to the rears. Not sure if it makes a difference, but it makes sense in my head.

forward and low is the way to go.


2. Are wheel weights ever used to balance the rig? I'm running my battery on the front axle so to balance the axle I added more weight to the drivers side than the passenger side. (apx 2.5 oz more on the driver side)

I wouldn't worry about it...the motors offset that weight enough im sure
nappahdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 08:45 PM   #33
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Glendale Az
Posts: 384
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by nappahdog View Post
1. I like the idea of putting the weight in front of the axle so it can still be effective on the front tires on steep verticals instead of transferring to the rears. Not sure if it makes a difference, but it makes sense in my head.

forward and low is the way to go.


2. Are wheel weights ever used to balance the rig? I'm running my battery on the front axle so to balance the axle I added more weight to the drivers side than the passenger side. (apx 2.5 oz more on the driver side)

I wouldn't worry about it...the motors offset that weight enough im sure
I agree with nappahdog.....weight distribution looks fine. Super looks good Sean.....keep up the good work
bquin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 11:27 AM   #34
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2WheelFlyer View Post
nice video man! talk about performance improvement over stock!
I'm pretty surprised with how well it's doing. I'm anxious to get around other Supers again and see how it measures up now....
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 11:35 AM   #35
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2WheelFlyer View Post
I'd say you can add one more bolt on the left to balance your battery on the right, will do no harm and might help the rig perform the same in off camber situations to the left and to the right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nappahdog View Post
1. I like the idea of putting the weight in front of the axle so it can still be effective on the front tires on steep verticals instead of transferring to the rears. Not sure if it makes a difference, but it makes sense in my head.

forward and low is the way to go.


2. Are wheel weights ever used to balance the rig? I'm running my battery on the front axle so to balance the axle I added more weight to the drivers side than the passenger side. (apx 2.5 oz more on the driver side)

I wouldn't worry about it...the motors offset that weight enough im sure
Quote:
Originally Posted by bquin View Post
I agree with nappahdog.....weight distribution looks fine. Super looks good Sean.....keep up the good work
Thanks for the input guys. I'll add more weight to the drivers side so the total weight added down low is closer to the same.

I have some major changes coming and will do it afterwards so I can compare weight change.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 12:09 PM   #36
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT goes OLD SCHOOL

Picked up a CDW Chassis from BQuin for a nice price and wanted to get something that will meet comp requirements. I've been told this chassis did quite well, so I'm excited to see how it turns out.

Name:  IMG_1359.jpg
Views: 483
Size:  46.4 KB

After a quick search I found this:

2011 CDW Super Bully

Here is what i have so far:

Name:  IMG_1507.jpg
Views: 457
Size:  62.6 KB

In order to keep the WB at 18" and keep the original links I moved the Lower link mount forward one hole and will have to mount the link outside the chassis. The upper links are just temporary that I had laying around. If i need more triangulation I can bend some different links and mount them outside the chassis. I think I will run Traxxas 3.5's up front and possibly in the rear. In the pics I have an Axial 4" shock plus bent rod ends making them a shy too long but mounted to the axle instead of the link. Is there a major drawback to mounting to the link? I've noticed the trend is mounting to the axle now.

Name:  IMG_1521.jpg
Views: 470
Size:  49.0 KB


And Just for fun I may rock my Original Mad Torque narrowed body until I get something more suitable. (Needs a little trimming)

Name:  IMG_1523.jpg
Views: 507
Size:  55.6 KB
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 11:17 AM   #37
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Razorback Haven
Posts: 1,620
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Great build! So are you still rockin the mt tubes and using the plastic chub that's molded to it? If so, I'm suprised it hasn't broken more than your one post earlier.
Tgreer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 04:47 PM   #38
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix / Glendale
Posts: 37
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

Thanks! Yeah, so far I've only broken the inner C I posted. I'm kind of surprised too! Not sure if it's luck, or I'm not pushing it hard enough yet. I've also had pretty good luck with the stock small 3rd in the front, which makes me lean towards I haven't pushed it hard enough. Now with the dual ESCs though I'm practicing front digs and rear burns a lot to learn how the car reacts, which I think puts a fair amount of stress on the drivetrain. Time will tell, I'll definetly update if they ever break and I will go to the aluminum inner C like the rear if needed.
Crawl in Az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 08:09 AM   #39
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: presKit
Posts: 690
Default Re: Sub-Par Super Build- MT

whered ya go? I was enjoying all of the mods, hope to see ya next season
nappahdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Sub-Par Super Build- MT - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SUPER detailed Super Build jetboat RC4WD Bully 58 10-17-2009 07:00 AM
What Super to build?? Agama General Crawlers 4 11-28-2008 11:08 AM
Hobbico CS-170 on par with hitec TG Krawler Freak Electronics 2 10-03-2007 06:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com