|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-11-2008, 03:15 AM | #1 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
| A revolution in suspensions ?
It is more and more difficult to see something which is really new on today's crawlers. Besides the attention seems focused on other axles such as the Ax-10 and the revolutions (the SW3, the use of the brushless, the droop, the dig ecc.) belog to the past. I tryed to realize a new type of suspensions. The idea is to decouple the twist movement from the vertical one. So I made a hub connected to the chassis with 4 equal lenght parallel links. Those links should allow only the vertical movement of the hub, but for the prototype I used the usual rod ends with balls adding some washer. In the Hub there is a hole for a pivot which is firmly connected to the servo plate of the axle, so the twist is around this pivot. The servo plate is on the left The hub mounted on my crawler, view from below The hub mounted on my crawler, side view An off-camber spot The same spot from another angle Obviously the system should be improved, but I wanted to open a new road with a prototype. The performances are not worse compared with the previous traditional 4-link suspension. When I will have a clear idea of the weak points and pro and cons of this suspension I will extend it to the rear axle. Bye Filippo Saluti Filippo Last edited by setecastronomy; 08-11-2008 at 03:18 AM. |
Sponsored Links | |
08-11-2008, 03:27 AM | #2 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Secret Crawl Location Deep In England
Posts: 546
|
forgive me having to ask but what are the advantages of this link mount?
|
08-11-2008, 03:35 AM | #3 |
Who's your Daddy-0! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Augusta
Posts: 5,009
|
Won't the links stay in the way when it flexes? ( Meaning in the way of rocks and so forth...) And the shocks are connected to the axles so the flex won't be any greater than a normal 4 link? Am I missing something here?
|
08-11-2008, 04:05 AM | #4 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
| Quote:
There is no need to triangulate the upper and lower llinks on a horizontal plane. There is no roll steering. It is extremely simple to undersand. The axle twist exactly at the center of the pivot, which is a well know point and not in the imaginary point the theory of 4-link suspension says. If you don't want the pinion angle to change during the suspension vertical movement you may have some difficulties with a traditional 4-link suspensions to make upper and lowers of equal lenght. I admit no one of the above point is so important for excellent performances but in some circustances they can make the difference. Bye Filippo | |
08-11-2008, 04:26 AM | #5 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Secret Crawl Location Deep In England
Posts: 546
|
So what stops your axle moving side to side? Is it the washers on the ballends? Matt |
08-12-2008, 01:29 AM | #6 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
| Quote:
Bye Filippo N.B. The twist movement is around the pivot which connects servo plate and hub. It is limited by shocks and by the slider connected to the pinon axle, but it is more than sufficient. | |
08-12-2008, 02:36 AM | #7 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Secret Crawl Location Deep In England
Posts: 546
|
So you are using the driveshaft as a suspension limiter?
|
08-12-2008, 06:58 AM | #8 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
| |
08-12-2008, 07:37 AM | #9 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Secret Crawl Location Deep In England
Posts: 546
|
ah right, How does it perform?
|
08-14-2008, 06:30 PM | #10 |
Newbie Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Naperville
Posts: 22
|
its a good idea but it doesent seam like thats realy needed becuse with a standard 4 link you can get up to 90 deg of flex and just hve to say you need to shave the bottom of your axles that will make a huge improvement
|
08-14-2008, 07:35 PM | #11 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan
Posts: 387
|
Interesting! Looks like that set up should help with axle steer. Can you post some flex shots?
|
08-18-2008, 02:09 AM | #12 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
| Quote:
Performances don't seem worse than those of a 4 link traditional suspension, but I didn't test it very much. My design opens some new ways to investigation. Lower links can be placed higher on axle side for more clearance and shocks can be mounted in a different manner (lots of people have the problem they scrab against the turned tire in twisting). I think they could be connected to the hub and not to the axle, while a rubber band could set the steady position of the axle respect to the hub. Bye Filippo | |
01-14-2009, 04:11 AM | #13 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
|
Finally I made a major upgrade to the suspension using new materials. Common rod ends with washer to limit their lateral movement were replaced by pivot (on the right near the servo plate) derived from furniture hardware. Rod ends were made cutting and drilling a plastic plate. The axle pivot was realized using bronze and a lathe. A new hub is visible on top while on the left their is a plate for mounting the esc and connecting together the upper links in order to make them stiffer and avoid any twist of the hub. The front suspension (those Msr10 are huge ) Front supsension from behind Rear supension with a little axle twist (notice the iron block on the servo plate where the bronze pivot is connected) Rear suspension Side view Repositioning the links on the hub now I have much more clearance but the shaft is completely exposed to rocks. If it wears or breaks I will change it with a metal one. In the front I would like to remove the shocks and put a torsion bar which keeps the axle horizontal, but I have no experience with torsion bars. I made some tests placing the shocks between the hub and the chassis. That way they acted only on the vertical movement of the axle while the twist was completely free. Unfortunately such a setup is obviously affected by a teriible torque twists. Bye Filippo |
01-14-2009, 04:48 AM | #14 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Croydon, Surrey, UK
Posts: 291
|
looks good......but i really cant see the advantages/dis-advantage or the point of it all Good for thinking outside the box though |
01-14-2009, 06:01 AM | #15 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 297
| Quote:
The idea behind this project is to completely decouple the twist from the vertical movement of the hub. Unfotunately due the way shocks are mounted thsi goal is not achieved yet. I don't even know if it is desiderable. Bye Filippo | |
02-08-2009, 08:42 AM | #16 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Appleton, Wi
Posts: 660
|
From what i can see the links stay stationary but can still travel up and down and the suspension flex comes from the pivot. and is limited by the shocks. Simply you extended the chassis out to the axles and replaced the the job the normal 4 links do with the pivot. I like it. |
02-09-2009, 03:01 PM | #17 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: yes
Posts: 182
|
I think it is awesome! It seems that it would perform like a tlt version of a stick chassis. Try adding two triangulated upper links to help prevent side to side movement.
|
02-09-2009, 03:58 PM | #18 |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
|
How about mounting shocks on the inside of the chassis and to the top of the pivot. They would be shorter than what you got right now.
|
02-09-2009, 08:54 PM | #19 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In A Nut Shell
Posts: 626
|
i like the idea good out of the box thinking mate!
|
02-09-2009, 09:48 PM | #20 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 173
|
To me it would seem that having all four links parallel would not work very well. I think that if you have the top and bottom links facing inwards, but at different angles. that would eliminate heavy bracing. I do like your concept. Its making a stick level comp out of a four bar chassis car.
Last edited by tom tom; 02-09-2009 at 09:59 PM. |
| |