• Welcome to RCCrawler Forums.

    It looks like you're enjoying RCCrawler's Forums but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members, and much more. Register now!

    Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

3d printer for rc parts

Thanks for posting that, was trying to figure that out last week but I'm still a bit timid with changing settings.



Trick, print 20x20 cubes when changing up. If you are dialed in already that is quicker than that benchy.
I number my cubes to remember my changes and file name

Infill can change, but sturdy walls and top and bottom are critical for strength as noted .


Hang up and Drive
 
3 hours in and this bumper looks amazing so far! 60% infill and a 4 layer shell to start. Can't wait to mount this! PETG is printing better for me than PLA, but I really haven't played much with the settings.

This is with the Monoprice Voxel, which is a rebranded Flashforge Adventurer 3. My previous 3d printer was not enclosed and my results were never consistent. Bed adhesion with this printer has been a non-issue.
7235dd44d28e3d150c39ab25d8ecb614.jpg
 
One thing I haven't gotten into is bridging large gaps without supports. This new design is 112mm high x 39mm wide (not including standoffs) x 39mm deep.

It kinda printed OK the first time. See the "Old design/print" photo below. The standoffs were kinda frayed, but still, surprisingly, usable. Filament is Hatchbox PETG.

Any tips to printing this more reliably without supports?

New design:



Old design/print:
 
Last edited:
Is there a reason that you aren't laying the 112mm section down flat? It's hard to tell, but the build plate looks big enough.
 
I've had decent luck bridging fairly large gaps but I think its mostly due to the Slic3r PE software. When it detects bridging it will allow for a fairly large bridge without supports.

If you do end up needing to use supports you can change the supports angle to 45, I've found that helpful so your print isnt layed down in the same direction as the support which can leave the print unsupported between the support rows.
 
Maybe doing this way to have the sides. assuming it's purpose is box like. will be strong. Printing on it's bottom would make weaker.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
Is there a reason that you aren't laying the 112mm section down flat? It's hard to tell, but the build plate looks big enough.

The model is slightly larger than the build plate which forces me to print in this orientation.


I've had decent luck bridging fairly large gaps but I think its mostly due to the Slic3r PE software. When it detects bridging it will allow for a fairly large bridge without supports.

If you do end up needing to use supports you can change the supports angle to 45, I've found that helpful so your print isnt layed down in the same direction as the support which can leave the print unsupported between the support rows.

I'm using Cura. I've tried Slic3r and found it to be less than intuitive, but that was a while ago.

Lots of people boast about Simplify 3D being the best, especially for supports, but it's $149!
 
can you print it at a 45° angle on the x axis and apply supports manually to the standoffs and bottom few mm of the build for stability.
or rotate it 45° on the z axes and 90° on the x axes so it lays corner to corner, might fit.
 
You guys are awesome! Thanks for the tips!!

The bumper I'm trying to print now is for my SCX10, which is a crazy light rig compared to my TRX-4. I may not have to make it bullet proof, but I'll be experimenting for sure!

I know its older post but if i want to add moar strength on larger prints I usualy bump up the number of outer layers more instead of adding more infill.

I print all my structural parts out of petg as well, my 3d printed 32 ford chassis was printed with 30% infill but 9 top layers and 9 bottom layers this made the bottom essentially 100% infill, but all the taller structures still had 30% infill, and the perimiter layers was set to 8, this made the upper link mounts basicaly 100% infill.

Its not the fat parts that break its the smaller details that don't hold up in most prints. so you only need to make the walls fat enough to fill in those smaller areas.
 

Attachments

  • 32 ford Chassis.jpg
    32 ford Chassis.jpg
    107.7 KB · Views: 1,002
Last edited:
I went with the Prusa I3 MK3 and I've been extremely pleased with it. Its really dialed in if you just want to get started quick and avoid having to troubleshoot. I feel like the extra cost is worth it for the support from the company, being able to cope with power outages, running out of filament, bump detection, it also can detect skipped steps and layer shifting.

I didn't realize it had all those features. How does it cope with power outages?

Can it reliably pause and resume print without issues?

If you already have a printer you like and like to mess with things you can buy a new mother board for your 3d printer that adds all those features in.

Personally I want to buy myself a wifi duet main board to all that and dual extruders to my Anet A8. I wan to try printing petg with 0 layer gap pla supports. There is a youtube video of a guy who printed a perfect sphere using this technique.
 
I know its older post but if i want to add moar strength on larger prints I usualy bump up the number of outer layers more instead of adding more infill.

I print all my structural parts out of petg as well, my 3d printed 32 ford chassis was printed with 30% infill but 9 top layers and 9 bottom layers this made the bottom essentially 100% infill, but all the taller structures still had 30% infill, and the perimiter layers was set to 8, this made the upper link mounts basicaly 100% infill.

Its not the fat parts that break its the smaller details that don't hold up in most prints. so you only need to make the walls fat enough to fill in those smaller areas.

This is good info. I have been bumping up my layer values, but never over 4. I'm going to have to try 9 [emoji16]
 
I’m working on a micro project at the moment. Messing with the leafs to figure out what parameters will make them at least sort of load supporting.


abc77fc1e784f1c18ffd78e6254ad9d0.jpg


6b4de919ff66e91c7ae0113bf1d59cef.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I would first print the springs at 0.42mm thick, then add helper springs as nessary. If that's too thin double it. Just because a single extrusion is 0.42mm. But I have never tried printing leafs myself.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
can you print it at a 45° angle on the x axis and apply supports manually to the standoffs and bottom few mm of the build for stability.
or rotate it 45° on the z axes and 90° on the x axes so it lays corner to corner, might fit.

I tried fitting it at 45° and it didn't fit on the bed.

I know its older post but if i want to add moar strength on larger prints I usualy bump up the number of outer layers more instead of adding more infill.

I print all my structural parts out of petg as well, my 3d printed 32 ford chassis was printed with 30% infill but 9 top layers and 9 bottom layers this made the bottom essentially 100% infill, but all the taller structures still had 30% infill, and the perimiter layers was set to 8, this made the upper link mounts basicaly 100% infill.

Its not the fat parts that break its the smaller details that don't hold up in most prints. so you only need to make the walls fat enough to fill in those smaller areas.

The software in the screenshot attachment...is the Slic3r?
 
Back
Top